Basel Elsayed, Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi, Mohamed Elhadary, Abdullah M Al-Jubouri, Noof Al-Qahtani, Semir Vranic, Rafif Al-Saady
{"title":"阑尾黏液性肿瘤的分子和免疫组织化学标志物:与卵巢黏液性肿瘤和结直肠腺癌的系统回顾和比较分析。","authors":"Basel Elsayed, Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi, Mohamed Elhadary, Abdullah M Al-Jubouri, Noof Al-Qahtani, Semir Vranic, Rafif Al-Saady","doi":"10.14670/HH-18-830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) represent a rare and diagnostically challenging group of tumors. This systematic review aims to summarize the reported molecular and immunohistochemical markers (IHC) associated with AMNs and compare them with ovarian mucinous neoplasms (OMNs) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE/PMC, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies looking at IHC and molecular markers in AMNs. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to compare the marker expression across different tumor types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 27 articles reporting several potential biomarkers for distinguishing between different subtypes of AMNs. Mutations in <i>KRAS</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, and <i>RNF43</i> emerged as notable biomarkers, with KRAS mutations being the most prevalent across all subtypes. Additionally, p53 IHC overexpression was associated with higher tumor grades. When comparing AMNs with OMNs, we observed a higher prevalence of CK20, CDX2, SATB2, and MUC2 IHC expression, as well as <i>KRAS</i> and <i>GNAS</i> mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, CK7 and PAX8 IHC expression were more prevalent in OMNs. Comparing AMNs with CRCs, we found a higher prevalence of TOPO1 and PTEN IHC expression, as well as <i>KRAS</i> and <i>GNAS</i> mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, nuclear β-catenin IHC expression, as well as <i>TP53</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations, were more prevalent in CRCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review identified possible markers for distinguishing AMNs and differentiating between AMNs, OMNs, or CRCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13164,"journal":{"name":"Histology and histopathology","volume":" ","pages":"18830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular and immunohistochemical markers in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A systematic review and comparative analysis with ovarian mucinous neoplasms and colorectal adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Basel Elsayed, Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi, Mohamed Elhadary, Abdullah M Al-Jubouri, Noof Al-Qahtani, Semir Vranic, Rafif Al-Saady\",\"doi\":\"10.14670/HH-18-830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) represent a rare and diagnostically challenging group of tumors. This systematic review aims to summarize the reported molecular and immunohistochemical markers (IHC) associated with AMNs and compare them with ovarian mucinous neoplasms (OMNs) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE/PMC, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies looking at IHC and molecular markers in AMNs. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to compare the marker expression across different tumor types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 27 articles reporting several potential biomarkers for distinguishing between different subtypes of AMNs. Mutations in <i>KRAS</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, and <i>RNF43</i> emerged as notable biomarkers, with KRAS mutations being the most prevalent across all subtypes. Additionally, p53 IHC overexpression was associated with higher tumor grades. When comparing AMNs with OMNs, we observed a higher prevalence of CK20, CDX2, SATB2, and MUC2 IHC expression, as well as <i>KRAS</i> and <i>GNAS</i> mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, CK7 and PAX8 IHC expression were more prevalent in OMNs. Comparing AMNs with CRCs, we found a higher prevalence of TOPO1 and PTEN IHC expression, as well as <i>KRAS</i> and <i>GNAS</i> mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, nuclear β-catenin IHC expression, as well as <i>TP53</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations, were more prevalent in CRCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review identified possible markers for distinguishing AMNs and differentiating between AMNs, OMNs, or CRCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histology and histopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histology and histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-830\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histology and histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阑尾黏液性肿瘤(amn)是一种罕见且具有诊断挑战性的肿瘤。本系统综述旨在总结已报道的与AMNs相关的分子和免疫组织化学标志物(IHC),并将其与卵巢粘液瘤(OMNs)和结直肠癌(CRC)进行比较。方法:在PubMed/MEDLINE/PMC、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行全面检索,以确定在amn中寻找免疫组化和分子标记的研究。使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来比较不同肿瘤类型的标记物表达。结果:我们鉴定了27篇文章,报道了几种潜在的生物标志物,用于区分不同亚型的amn。KRAS、GNAS和RNF43突变成为显著的生物标志物,KRAS突变在所有亚型中最为普遍。此外,p53 IHC过表达与较高的肿瘤分级相关。当比较amn和omn时,我们观察到amn中CK20、CDX2、SATB2和MUC2 IHC表达以及KRAS和GNAS突变的发生率更高。相反,CK7和PAX8 IHC表达在omn中更为普遍。将AMNs与crc进行比较,我们发现AMNs中TOPO1和PTEN IHC表达以及KRAS和GNAS突变的发生率更高。相反,细胞核β-catenin IHC表达以及TP53、APC和PIK3CA突变在crc中更为普遍。结论:本系统综述确定了区分amn和区分amn、omn或crc的可能标记物。
Molecular and immunohistochemical markers in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A systematic review and comparative analysis with ovarian mucinous neoplasms and colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Introduction: Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) represent a rare and diagnostically challenging group of tumors. This systematic review aims to summarize the reported molecular and immunohistochemical markers (IHC) associated with AMNs and compare them with ovarian mucinous neoplasms (OMNs) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC).
Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE/PMC, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies looking at IHC and molecular markers in AMNs. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to compare the marker expression across different tumor types.
Results: We identified 27 articles reporting several potential biomarkers for distinguishing between different subtypes of AMNs. Mutations in KRAS, GNAS, and RNF43 emerged as notable biomarkers, with KRAS mutations being the most prevalent across all subtypes. Additionally, p53 IHC overexpression was associated with higher tumor grades. When comparing AMNs with OMNs, we observed a higher prevalence of CK20, CDX2, SATB2, and MUC2 IHC expression, as well as KRAS and GNAS mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, CK7 and PAX8 IHC expression were more prevalent in OMNs. Comparing AMNs with CRCs, we found a higher prevalence of TOPO1 and PTEN IHC expression, as well as KRAS and GNAS mutations, in AMNs. Conversely, nuclear β-catenin IHC expression, as well as TP53, APC, and PIK3CA mutations, were more prevalent in CRCs.
Conclusion: This systematic review identified possible markers for distinguishing AMNs and differentiating between AMNs, OMNs, or CRCs.
期刊介绍:
HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY is a peer-reviewed international journal, the purpose of which is to publish original and review articles in all fields of the microscopical morphology, cell biology and tissue engineering; high quality is the overall consideration. Its format is the standard international size of 21 x 27.7 cm. One volume is published every year (more than 1,300 pages, approximately 90 original works and 40 reviews). Each volume consists of 12 numbers published monthly online. The printed version of the journal includes 4 books every year; each of them compiles 3 numbers previously published online.