重组与基于鸡蛋的四价流感疫苗在养老院居民中的应用:一项聚类随机试验。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677
Kevin W McConeghy, H Edward Davidson, David H Canaday, Lisa Han, Kaleen Hayes, Rosa R Baier, Yasin Abul, Elie Saade, Vince Mor, Stefan Gravenstein
{"title":"重组与基于鸡蛋的四价流感疫苗在养老院居民中的应用:一项聚类随机试验。","authors":"Kevin W McConeghy, H Edward Davidson, David H Canaday, Lisa Han, Kaleen Hayes, Rosa R Baier, Yasin Abul, Elie Saade, Vince Mor, Stefan Gravenstein","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Influenza vaccination remains the most important intervention to prevent influenza morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The additional effectiveness of recombinant influenza vaccine vs standard dose vaccines was demonstrated in outpatient older adults but has not been evaluated in nursing home populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare hospitalization rates among residents in nursing homes immunized with a recombinant vs a standard dose egg-based influenza vaccine.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This pragmatic cluster randomized trial assessed nursing home residents 65 years or older residing in a US facility for 100 or more days before the start of influenza season (October 1). The study was conducted across the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 influenza seasons and randomly assigned nursing homes 1:1 within blocks categorized by proportion of Black residents and prior resident hospitalization rates. Medicare claims data were used to evaluate resident-level hospitalization outcomes. Enrollment and allocation to treatment groups began on July 20, 2019. Data analysis began on January 1, 2021, with primary end points finalized June 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Nursing homes were cluster randomized to vaccinate all residents with recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) or standard egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was respiratory-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included death and hospitalization due to any cause.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 565 person observations (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [13.1] years; 63.0% female) at 1078 nursing homes were included, with 72 005 residents in nursing homes randomized to provide RIV4 and 72 560 residents in nursing home randomized to provide IIV4. In total, 85.6% of the residents received influenza vaccination. Baseline resident characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. For the primary end point of respiratory-related hospitalizations, there were 1387 hospitalizations (1.9%) in the RIV4 group vs 1424 (2.0%) in the IIV4 group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-2.17). Hospitalization rates by vaccine were similar for other hospitalization outcomes and death, overall, and by season and subgroups (gender, race, and comorbidities).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cluster randomized trial of nursing homes, there was no significant difference between recombinant or standard dose vaccine for reducing hospitalizations associated with influenza illness. However, the COVID-19 pandemic restricting influenza activity along with poor vaccine match to circulating strains substantially limits the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03965195.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2452677"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recombinant vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination for Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin W McConeghy, H Edward Davidson, David H Canaday, Lisa Han, Kaleen Hayes, Rosa R Baier, Yasin Abul, Elie Saade, Vince Mor, Stefan Gravenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Influenza vaccination remains the most important intervention to prevent influenza morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The additional effectiveness of recombinant influenza vaccine vs standard dose vaccines was demonstrated in outpatient older adults but has not been evaluated in nursing home populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare hospitalization rates among residents in nursing homes immunized with a recombinant vs a standard dose egg-based influenza vaccine.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This pragmatic cluster randomized trial assessed nursing home residents 65 years or older residing in a US facility for 100 or more days before the start of influenza season (October 1). The study was conducted across the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 influenza seasons and randomly assigned nursing homes 1:1 within blocks categorized by proportion of Black residents and prior resident hospitalization rates. Medicare claims data were used to evaluate resident-level hospitalization outcomes. Enrollment and allocation to treatment groups began on July 20, 2019. Data analysis began on January 1, 2021, with primary end points finalized June 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Nursing homes were cluster randomized to vaccinate all residents with recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) or standard egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was respiratory-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included death and hospitalization due to any cause.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 565 person observations (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [13.1] years; 63.0% female) at 1078 nursing homes were included, with 72 005 residents in nursing homes randomized to provide RIV4 and 72 560 residents in nursing home randomized to provide IIV4. In total, 85.6% of the residents received influenza vaccination. Baseline resident characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. For the primary end point of respiratory-related hospitalizations, there were 1387 hospitalizations (1.9%) in the RIV4 group vs 1424 (2.0%) in the IIV4 group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-2.17). Hospitalization rates by vaccine were similar for other hospitalization outcomes and death, overall, and by season and subgroups (gender, race, and comorbidities).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cluster randomized trial of nursing homes, there was no significant difference between recombinant or standard dose vaccine for reducing hospitalizations associated with influenza illness. However, the COVID-19 pandemic restricting influenza activity along with poor vaccine match to circulating strains substantially limits the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03965195.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e2452677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:流感疫苗接种仍然是预防养老院居民流感发病率和死亡率的最重要干预措施。重组流感疫苗与标准剂量疫苗的额外有效性已在门诊老年人中得到证实,但尚未在养老院人群中进行评估。目的:比较重组疫苗与标准剂量蛋基流感疫苗在养老院居民中的住院率。设计、环境和参与者:这项实用的集群随机试验评估了在流感季节开始(10月1日)之前在美国设施居住100天或更长时间的65岁或以上的养老院居民。该研究在2019年至2020年和2020年至2021年流感季节进行,并按黑人居民比例和先前居民住院率随机分配了1:1的养老院。医疗保险索赔数据用于评估居民水平的住院治疗结果。2019年7月20日开始登记和分配治疗组。数据分析于2021年1月1日开始,主要终点于2024年6月30日确定。干预:对养老院进行整群随机分组,让所有居民接种重组四价流感疫苗(RIV4)或标准蛋基四价灭活流感疫苗(IIV4)。主要结局和措施:主要结局为呼吸相关住院。次要结局包括死亡和因任何原因住院。结果:共144 565人观察(平均[SD]年龄77.4[13.1]岁;纳入1078家养老院的63.0%女性),其中72 005名养老院居民随机提供RIV4, 72 560名养老院居民随机提供IIV4。85.6%的居民接种了流感疫苗。各治疗组的基线居民特征具有可比性。对于呼吸相关住院的主要终点,RIV4组有1387例(1.9%)住院,IIV4组有1424例(2.0%)住院(风险比,1.01;95% ci, 0.62-2.17)。总体而言,疫苗的住院率与其他住院结果和死亡相似,按季节和亚组(性别、种族和合并症)也相似。结论和相关性:在养老院的整群随机试验中,重组疫苗和标准剂量疫苗在减少流感相关住院率方面没有显著差异。然而,COVID-19大流行限制了流感活动,以及疫苗与流行毒株的不匹配大大限制了结论。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT03965195。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recombinant vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination for Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Importance: Influenza vaccination remains the most important intervention to prevent influenza morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The additional effectiveness of recombinant influenza vaccine vs standard dose vaccines was demonstrated in outpatient older adults but has not been evaluated in nursing home populations.

Objective: To compare hospitalization rates among residents in nursing homes immunized with a recombinant vs a standard dose egg-based influenza vaccine.

Design, setting, and participants: This pragmatic cluster randomized trial assessed nursing home residents 65 years or older residing in a US facility for 100 or more days before the start of influenza season (October 1). The study was conducted across the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 influenza seasons and randomly assigned nursing homes 1:1 within blocks categorized by proportion of Black residents and prior resident hospitalization rates. Medicare claims data were used to evaluate resident-level hospitalization outcomes. Enrollment and allocation to treatment groups began on July 20, 2019. Data analysis began on January 1, 2021, with primary end points finalized June 30, 2024.

Intervention: Nursing homes were cluster randomized to vaccinate all residents with recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) or standard egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was respiratory-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included death and hospitalization due to any cause.

Results: A total of 144 565 person observations (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [13.1] years; 63.0% female) at 1078 nursing homes were included, with 72 005 residents in nursing homes randomized to provide RIV4 and 72 560 residents in nursing home randomized to provide IIV4. In total, 85.6% of the residents received influenza vaccination. Baseline resident characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. For the primary end point of respiratory-related hospitalizations, there were 1387 hospitalizations (1.9%) in the RIV4 group vs 1424 (2.0%) in the IIV4 group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-2.17). Hospitalization rates by vaccine were similar for other hospitalization outcomes and death, overall, and by season and subgroups (gender, race, and comorbidities).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cluster randomized trial of nursing homes, there was no significant difference between recombinant or standard dose vaccine for reducing hospitalizations associated with influenza illness. However, the COVID-19 pandemic restricting influenza activity along with poor vaccine match to circulating strains substantially limits the conclusions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03965195.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Lipoprotein a Testing Patterns in the Veterans Health Administration. Parent-Targeted Oral Health Text Messaging for Underserved Children Attending Pediatric Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Prevalence of Dementia Among US Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Recombinant vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination for Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1