术前与术后立体定向放射治疗脑转移:比较研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6
S Farzad Maroufi, Mohammad Sadegh Fallahi, S Parmis Maroufi, Vida Kassaeyan, Paolo Palmisciano, Jason P Sheehan
{"title":"术前与术后立体定向放射治疗脑转移:比较研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"S Farzad Maroufi, Mohammad Sadegh Fallahi, S Parmis Maroufi, Vida Kassaeyan, Paolo Palmisciano, Jason P Sheehan","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resection is often the primary treatment for large brain tumors but is less practical for multiple brain metastases (BM). Current guidelines recommend stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for untreated BMs or following the surgical removal of a solitary BM to reduce the risk of local tumor recurrence. Preoperative SRS (pre-SRS) shows promise with fewer complications and more precise targeting, but it lacks tissue diagnosis and may hinder wound healing. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of pre-SRS and postoperative SRS (post-SRS) for BM treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on PICO criteria, including patients with metastatic intracranial lesions undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiosurgery. Data related to outcomes and complications were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed, employing the fixed effect model due to study design similarities and limited patient numbers. Four studies encompassing 616 BM patients (221 preoperative, 405 postoperative) were included. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, cancer source, and lesion location, were similar between groups. Radiosurgery modalities included LINAC and Gamma Knife, with hypofractionated treatments more common postoperatively. Outcomes showed comparable overall survival (p = 0.07), local failure (p = 0.26), and distant failure rates (p = 0.84) between groups. The preoperative group had lower risks of radiation necrosis (p = 0.02) and leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.03) in 1-year follow-up, with significantly better composite outcomes (p = 0.04). No significant difference in wound issues was observed (p = 0.98). This review reveals pre- and post-SRS for BM have similar outcomes for LF, DF, and OS. Pre-SRS potentially lowers RN and LMD risks, with better tumor targeting and less radiation to healthy tissue, while post-SRS targets residual disease but with higher complication risks. Future research should optimize SRS protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.\",\"authors\":\"S Farzad Maroufi, Mohammad Sadegh Fallahi, S Parmis Maroufi, Vida Kassaeyan, Paolo Palmisciano, Jason P Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resection is often the primary treatment for large brain tumors but is less practical for multiple brain metastases (BM). Current guidelines recommend stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for untreated BMs or following the surgical removal of a solitary BM to reduce the risk of local tumor recurrence. Preoperative SRS (pre-SRS) shows promise with fewer complications and more precise targeting, but it lacks tissue diagnosis and may hinder wound healing. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of pre-SRS and postoperative SRS (post-SRS) for BM treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on PICO criteria, including patients with metastatic intracranial lesions undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiosurgery. Data related to outcomes and complications were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed, employing the fixed effect model due to study design similarities and limited patient numbers. Four studies encompassing 616 BM patients (221 preoperative, 405 postoperative) were included. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, cancer source, and lesion location, were similar between groups. Radiosurgery modalities included LINAC and Gamma Knife, with hypofractionated treatments more common postoperatively. Outcomes showed comparable overall survival (p = 0.07), local failure (p = 0.26), and distant failure rates (p = 0.84) between groups. The preoperative group had lower risks of radiation necrosis (p = 0.02) and leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.03) in 1-year follow-up, with significantly better composite outcomes (p = 0.04). No significant difference in wound issues was observed (p = 0.98). This review reveals pre- and post-SRS for BM have similar outcomes for LF, DF, and OS. Pre-SRS potentially lowers RN and LMD risks, with better tumor targeting and less radiation to healthy tissue, while post-SRS targets residual disease but with higher complication risks. Future research should optimize SRS protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

切除通常是大脑瘤的主要治疗方法,但对于多发性脑转移瘤(BM)则不太实用。目前的指南推荐立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗未经治疗的脑转移或手术切除孤立性脑转移后,以降低局部肿瘤复发的风险。术前SRS (pre-SRS)有希望减少并发症和更精确的靶向,但缺乏组织诊断,可能阻碍伤口愈合。本研究旨在比较前SRS和术后SRS(后SRS)治疗BM的安全性和有效性。在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索。根据PICO标准选择研究,包括术前或术后接受放射手术的转移性颅内病变患者。提取与结果和并发症相关的数据。由于研究设计相似且患者数量有限,采用固定效应模型进行meta分析。纳入4项研究,共纳入616例BM患者(术前221例,术后405例)。患者的特征,包括年龄、性别、癌症来源和病变部位,在两组之间相似。放射手术方式包括LINAC和伽玛刀,术后低分割治疗更为常见。结果显示,两组之间的总生存率(p = 0.07)、局部失败率(p = 0.26)和远处失败率(p = 0.84)相当。术前组1年随访中放射性坏死(p = 0.02)和轻脑膜疾病(p = 0.03)的发生率较术前组低,综合预后明显较术前组好(p = 0.04)。两组在伤口问题上无显著差异(p = 0.98)。本综述显示,BM的srs治疗前后,LF、DF和OS的预后相似。srs前可能降低RN和LMD风险,具有更好的肿瘤靶向性和更少的对健康组织的辐射,而srs后靶向残留疾病,但并发症风险更高。未来的研究应优化SRS协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Resection is often the primary treatment for large brain tumors but is less practical for multiple brain metastases (BM). Current guidelines recommend stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for untreated BMs or following the surgical removal of a solitary BM to reduce the risk of local tumor recurrence. Preoperative SRS (pre-SRS) shows promise with fewer complications and more precise targeting, but it lacks tissue diagnosis and may hinder wound healing. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of pre-SRS and postoperative SRS (post-SRS) for BM treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on PICO criteria, including patients with metastatic intracranial lesions undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiosurgery. Data related to outcomes and complications were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed, employing the fixed effect model due to study design similarities and limited patient numbers. Four studies encompassing 616 BM patients (221 preoperative, 405 postoperative) were included. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, cancer source, and lesion location, were similar between groups. Radiosurgery modalities included LINAC and Gamma Knife, with hypofractionated treatments more common postoperatively. Outcomes showed comparable overall survival (p = 0.07), local failure (p = 0.26), and distant failure rates (p = 0.84) between groups. The preoperative group had lower risks of radiation necrosis (p = 0.02) and leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.03) in 1-year follow-up, with significantly better composite outcomes (p = 0.04). No significant difference in wound issues was observed (p = 0.98). This review reveals pre- and post-SRS for BM have similar outcomes for LF, DF, and OS. Pre-SRS potentially lowers RN and LMD risks, with better tumor targeting and less radiation to healthy tissue, while post-SRS targets residual disease but with higher complication risks. Future research should optimize SRS protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Deep brain stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and a single-center clinical experience. Detailed evaluation of the long-term outcomes of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: A single-center retrospective study. Neuroworsening in traumatic brain injury: A consensus of the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC) and the Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (FLANC) expert group. Correction to: Surgical screening protocol for craniocervical instability secondary to ehlers-danlos syndrome and other connective tissue disorders: analysis of a 347 patient case series. Stand-alone porous titanium cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical outcomes in a multicenter experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1