评估用于监测肾脏异体移植排斥反应的分散式捐献者衍生细胞游离 DNA 检测。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13919
Alexandre Loupy, Anaïs Certain, Narin S Tangprasertchai, Maud Racapé, Cindy Ursule-Dufait, Kawthar Benbadi, Marc Raynaud, Evgeniya Vaskova, Corina Marchis, Sílvia Casas, Tim Hague, Oriol Bestard, Delphine Kervella, Carmen Lefaucheur, Thierry Viard, Olivier Aubert
{"title":"评估用于监测肾脏异体移植排斥反应的分散式捐献者衍生细胞游离 DNA 检测。","authors":"Alexandre Loupy, Anaïs Certain, Narin S Tangprasertchai, Maud Racapé, Cindy Ursule-Dufait, Kawthar Benbadi, Marc Raynaud, Evgeniya Vaskova, Corina Marchis, Sílvia Casas, Tim Hague, Oriol Bestard, Delphine Kervella, Carmen Lefaucheur, Thierry Viard, Olivier Aubert","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury detection. This study aimed to evaluate a new, decentralized dd-cfDNA testing kit against a centralized dd-cfDNA testing service broadly utilized in the United States. Kidney transplant recipients with decentralized and centralized dd-cfDNA measurements and concomitant kidney allograft biopsies were included in the study. 580 kidney allograft recipients from 3 referral centers were included for 603 total evaluations. Correlation between assays was evaluated using r-squared (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>) and Spearman's rank correlation test, and associations with rejection using logistic regression analyses and discrimination using area under the curve. Mean dd-cfDNA levels from decentralized and centralized tests were 0.51% ± 0.81% and 0.43% ± 0.78%, respectively. The assays were highly correlated, with <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.95 and Spearman's rank correlation 0.88 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Both tests showed significant association with allograft rejection (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and good and similar discriminations to predict rejection (AUC: 0.758 for the decentralized and AUC: 0.760 for the centralized dd-cfDNA; <i>p</i> = 0.8466). Consistency between the assays was also confirmed across clinical scenarios including post-transplant timepoint, allograft stability, and allograft rejection subcategories. This decentralized dd-cfDNA assessment demonstrates high accuracy and value to non-invasively monitor kidney recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Decentralized Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Assay for Kidney Allograft Rejection Monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Loupy, Anaïs Certain, Narin S Tangprasertchai, Maud Racapé, Cindy Ursule-Dufait, Kawthar Benbadi, Marc Raynaud, Evgeniya Vaskova, Corina Marchis, Sílvia Casas, Tim Hague, Oriol Bestard, Delphine Kervella, Carmen Lefaucheur, Thierry Viard, Olivier Aubert\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ti.2024.13919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury detection. This study aimed to evaluate a new, decentralized dd-cfDNA testing kit against a centralized dd-cfDNA testing service broadly utilized in the United States. Kidney transplant recipients with decentralized and centralized dd-cfDNA measurements and concomitant kidney allograft biopsies were included in the study. 580 kidney allograft recipients from 3 referral centers were included for 603 total evaluations. Correlation between assays was evaluated using r-squared (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>) and Spearman's rank correlation test, and associations with rejection using logistic regression analyses and discrimination using area under the curve. Mean dd-cfDNA levels from decentralized and centralized tests were 0.51% ± 0.81% and 0.43% ± 0.78%, respectively. The assays were highly correlated, with <i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.95 and Spearman's rank correlation 0.88 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Both tests showed significant association with allograft rejection (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and good and similar discriminations to predict rejection (AUC: 0.758 for the decentralized and AUC: 0.760 for the centralized dd-cfDNA; <i>p</i> = 0.8466). Consistency between the assays was also confirmed across clinical scenarios including post-transplant timepoint, allograft stability, and allograft rejection subcategories. This decentralized dd-cfDNA assessment demonstrates high accuracy and value to non-invasively monitor kidney recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant International\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"13919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13919\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

供体来源的无细胞DNA (dd-cfDNA)是一种新兴的用于同种异体移植损伤检测的非侵入性生物标志物。本研究旨在评估一种新的分散式dd-cfDNA检测试剂盒与美国广泛使用的集中式dd-cfDNA检测服务。进行分散式和集中式dd-cfDNA检测并同时进行同种异体肾移植活检的肾移植受者被纳入研究。来自3个转诊中心的580名肾移植受者进行了603次总评估。采用r-squared (r 2)和Spearman等级相关检验评估各试验之间的相关性,采用逻辑回归分析评估与拒绝的相关性,采用曲线下面积评估与歧视的相关性。分散和集中检测的平均dd-cfDNA水平分别为0.51%±0.81%和0.43%±0.78%。两项检测结果高度相关,r 2 = 0.95, Spearman秩相关0.88 (p < 0.0001)。两项试验均显示与同种异体移植排斥反应有显著相关性(p < 0.0001),预测排斥反应的判别良好且相似(分散式dd-cfDNA的AUC: 0.758,集中式dd-cfDNA的AUC: 0.760;P = 0.8466)。在移植后时间点、同种异体移植物稳定性和同种异体移植物排斥亚类等临床情况下,测定方法之间的一致性也得到了证实。这种分散的dd-cfDNA评估对无创监测肾受者显示出很高的准确性和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Decentralized Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Assay for Kidney Allograft Rejection Monitoring.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury detection. This study aimed to evaluate a new, decentralized dd-cfDNA testing kit against a centralized dd-cfDNA testing service broadly utilized in the United States. Kidney transplant recipients with decentralized and centralized dd-cfDNA measurements and concomitant kidney allograft biopsies were included in the study. 580 kidney allograft recipients from 3 referral centers were included for 603 total evaluations. Correlation between assays was evaluated using r-squared (r 2) and Spearman's rank correlation test, and associations with rejection using logistic regression analyses and discrimination using area under the curve. Mean dd-cfDNA levels from decentralized and centralized tests were 0.51% ± 0.81% and 0.43% ± 0.78%, respectively. The assays were highly correlated, with r 2 = 0.95 and Spearman's rank correlation 0.88 (p < 0.0001). Both tests showed significant association with allograft rejection (p < 0.0001) and good and similar discriminations to predict rejection (AUC: 0.758 for the decentralized and AUC: 0.760 for the centralized dd-cfDNA; p = 0.8466). Consistency between the assays was also confirmed across clinical scenarios including post-transplant timepoint, allograft stability, and allograft rejection subcategories. This decentralized dd-cfDNA assessment demonstrates high accuracy and value to non-invasively monitor kidney recipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
The Evolution of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Organ Transplantation. Endovascular Preparation With Innovative Custom-Made Stent-Graft Before Kidney Transplantation: The Solution for Patients With Hostile Iliac Calcification. Impact of Organ Donor Pretreatment With Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in a Murine Model of Allogenic Kidney Transplantation. Expanding the Scope of Microvascular Inflammation: Unveiling Its Presence Beyond Antibody-Mediated Rejection Into T-Cell Mediated Contexts. Liver Transplantation in Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis. Benefits and Limitations of Psychosocial Selection and Support in Alcohol Relapse. The Experience of a Tertiary Center in Italy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1