基于治疗前血小板计数评价Lusutrombopag治疗慢性肝病的疗效:一项回顾性多中心研究

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70081
Takayoshi Suga, Satoru Kakizaki, Atsushi Naganuma, Takeshi Hatanaka, Satoshi Takakusagi, Daichi Takizawa, Hirotaka Arai, Takashi Ueno, Keisuke Iizuka, Toru Fukuchi, Shuichi Saito, Hiroki Tojima, Yuichi Yamazaki, Toshio Uraoka
{"title":"基于治疗前血小板计数评价Lusutrombopag治疗慢性肝病的疗效:一项回顾性多中心研究","authors":"Takayoshi Suga,&nbsp;Satoru Kakizaki,&nbsp;Atsushi Naganuma,&nbsp;Takeshi Hatanaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Takakusagi,&nbsp;Daichi Takizawa,&nbsp;Hirotaka Arai,&nbsp;Takashi Ueno,&nbsp;Keisuke Iizuka,&nbsp;Toru Fukuchi,&nbsp;Shuichi Saito,&nbsp;Hiroki Tojima,&nbsp;Yuichi Yamazaki,&nbsp;Toshio Uraoka","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists are used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled for invasive procedures. The efficacy of lusutrombopag based on the pretreatment platelet count was investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients treated at nine hospitals from December 2015 to December 2023 were included. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients achieving a platelet count ≥ 50 000/μL and the change in platelet count.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy patients were eligible for evaluation. Patients with a pretreatment platelet count &lt; 40 000/μL had a significantly lower rate of achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL than those with a pretreatment count of 40 000–50 000/μL (62.5% vs. 84.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.038); however, there was no significant difference in the change in platelet count (25 700 vs. 24 400/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.972). Patients with viral-related cirrhosis showed a significantly greater change in platelet count than the others (29 100 vs. 19 200/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.012). For patients receiving multiple lusutrombopag treatments, the change in platelet count was significantly lower in the second treatment than in the first treatment (26 900 vs. 20 800/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.041). The main adverse event observed was thrombosis (2.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Lusutrombopag increases platelet count regardless of pretreatment levels, but efficacy, defined as achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL, may be insufficient in patients with a pretreatment platelet count &lt; 40 000/μL. Additionally, patients with non-viral liver disease responded less well to treatment compared to those with viral liver disease. Therefore, treatment strategies should be tailored based on pretreatment platelet counts and the etiology of liver disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Efficacy of Lusutrombopag for Chronic Liver Disease Based on Pre-Treatment Platelet Counts: A Retrospective Multicenter Study\",\"authors\":\"Takayoshi Suga,&nbsp;Satoru Kakizaki,&nbsp;Atsushi Naganuma,&nbsp;Takeshi Hatanaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Takakusagi,&nbsp;Daichi Takizawa,&nbsp;Hirotaka Arai,&nbsp;Takashi Ueno,&nbsp;Keisuke Iizuka,&nbsp;Toru Fukuchi,&nbsp;Shuichi Saito,&nbsp;Hiroki Tojima,&nbsp;Yuichi Yamazaki,&nbsp;Toshio Uraoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists are used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled for invasive procedures. The efficacy of lusutrombopag based on the pretreatment platelet count was investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients treated at nine hospitals from December 2015 to December 2023 were included. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients achieving a platelet count ≥ 50 000/μL and the change in platelet count.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy patients were eligible for evaluation. Patients with a pretreatment platelet count &lt; 40 000/μL had a significantly lower rate of achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL than those with a pretreatment count of 40 000–50 000/μL (62.5% vs. 84.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.038); however, there was no significant difference in the change in platelet count (25 700 vs. 24 400/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.972). Patients with viral-related cirrhosis showed a significantly greater change in platelet count than the others (29 100 vs. 19 200/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.012). For patients receiving multiple lusutrombopag treatments, the change in platelet count was significantly lower in the second treatment than in the first treatment (26 900 vs. 20 800/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.041). The main adverse event observed was thrombosis (2.9%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lusutrombopag increases platelet count regardless of pretreatment levels, but efficacy, defined as achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL, may be insufficient in patients with a pretreatment platelet count &lt; 40 000/μL. Additionally, patients with non-viral liver disease responded less well to treatment compared to those with viral liver disease. Therefore, treatment strategies should be tailored based on pretreatment platelet counts and the etiology of liver disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口服血小板生成素受体激动剂用于治疗计划进行侵入性手术的慢性肝病患者的血小板减少症。以血小板计数为基础,观察lusutrombopag的疗效。方法:选取2015年12月至2023年12月在9家医院就诊的患者。通过比较血小板计数≥50 000/μL的患者比例和血小板计数的变化来评价疗效。结果:70例患者符合评估条件。患者的预处理血小板计数p = 0.038);血小板计数变化差异无统计学意义(25 700 vs 24 400/μL, p = 0.972)。病毒相关性肝硬化患者血小板计数变化明显大于其他患者(29 100比19 200/μL, p = 0.012)。对于多次使用lusutrombopag治疗的患者,第二次治疗的血小板计数变化明显低于第一次治疗(26 900 vs 20 800/μL, p = 0.041)。观察到的主要不良事件为血栓形成(2.9%)。讨论:无论预处理水平如何,Lusutrombopag都能增加血小板计数,但对于血小板计数达到≥50000 /μL的患者,疗效可能不足
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Lusutrombopag for Chronic Liver Disease Based on Pre-Treatment Platelet Counts: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Background

Oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists are used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled for invasive procedures. The efficacy of lusutrombopag based on the pretreatment platelet count was investigated.

Methods

Patients treated at nine hospitals from December 2015 to December 2023 were included. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients achieving a platelet count ≥ 50 000/μL and the change in platelet count.

Results

Seventy patients were eligible for evaluation. Patients with a pretreatment platelet count < 40 000/μL had a significantly lower rate of achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL than those with a pretreatment count of 40 000–50 000/μL (62.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.038); however, there was no significant difference in the change in platelet count (25 700 vs. 24 400/μL, p = 0.972). Patients with viral-related cirrhosis showed a significantly greater change in platelet count than the others (29 100 vs. 19 200/μL, p = 0.012). For patients receiving multiple lusutrombopag treatments, the change in platelet count was significantly lower in the second treatment than in the first treatment (26 900 vs. 20 800/μL, p = 0.041). The main adverse event observed was thrombosis (2.9%).

Discussion

Lusutrombopag increases platelet count regardless of pretreatment levels, but efficacy, defined as achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL, may be insufficient in patients with a pretreatment platelet count < 40 000/μL. Additionally, patients with non-viral liver disease responded less well to treatment compared to those with viral liver disease. Therefore, treatment strategies should be tailored based on pretreatment platelet counts and the etiology of liver disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of Retinol-Binding Protein in Predicting Mortality in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Large Friable Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor Complicated by Hemorrhagic Shock: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature Efficacy of Metal Stents Versus Plastic Stents for Treatment of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Causal Exposures in Pancreatic Cancer Incidence: Insights From Mendelian Randomization Studies Can Peritoneal Biopsy Diagnose Atypical Cases of Familial Mediterranean Fever?: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1