美国多种癌症早期检测测试的成本效益。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89643
Anuraag R Kansal, Ali Tafazzoli, Alissa Shaul, Ameya Chavan, Weicheng Ye, Denise Zou, A Mark Fendrick
{"title":"美国多种癌症早期检测测试的成本效益。","authors":"Anuraag R Kansal, Ali Tafazzoli, Alissa Shaul, Ameya Chavan, Weicheng Ye, Denise Zou, A Mark Fendrick","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing could result in earlier cancer diagnosis, thereby improving survival and reducing treatment costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing plus usual care (UC) screening while accounting for the impact of clinical uncertainty and population heterogeneity for an MCED test with broad coverage of solid cancer incidence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cost-effectiveness analysis of MCED testing plus UC vs UC alone in an adult population in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid cohort-level model compared annual MCED testing plus UC with UC alone in detecting cancer among individuals aged 50 to 79 years over a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of key clinical uncertainties and population heterogeneity in valuing MCED, including differential survival by cell-free DNA detectability status, cancer progression rate, and how the test is likely to be implemented in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100,000 individuals, MCED testing plus UC shifted 7200 cancers to earlier stages at diagnosis compared with UC alone, resulting in an additional 0.14 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and $5241 treatment cost savings per person screened and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $66,048/QALY gained at $949 test price. Among analyses of clinical uncertainties, differential survival had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MCED testing plus UC was cost-effective in all analyses with a maximum ICER of $91,092/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under a range of likely clinical scenarios, MCED testing was estimated to be cost-effective, improving survival and reducing treatment costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 12","pages":"e352-e358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of a multicancer early detection test in the US.\",\"authors\":\"Anuraag R Kansal, Ali Tafazzoli, Alissa Shaul, Ameya Chavan, Weicheng Ye, Denise Zou, A Mark Fendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing could result in earlier cancer diagnosis, thereby improving survival and reducing treatment costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing plus usual care (UC) screening while accounting for the impact of clinical uncertainty and population heterogeneity for an MCED test with broad coverage of solid cancer incidence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cost-effectiveness analysis of MCED testing plus UC vs UC alone in an adult population in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid cohort-level model compared annual MCED testing plus UC with UC alone in detecting cancer among individuals aged 50 to 79 years over a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of key clinical uncertainties and population heterogeneity in valuing MCED, including differential survival by cell-free DNA detectability status, cancer progression rate, and how the test is likely to be implemented in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100,000 individuals, MCED testing plus UC shifted 7200 cancers to earlier stages at diagnosis compared with UC alone, resulting in an additional 0.14 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and $5241 treatment cost savings per person screened and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $66,048/QALY gained at $949 test price. Among analyses of clinical uncertainties, differential survival had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MCED testing plus UC was cost-effective in all analyses with a maximum ICER of $91,092/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under a range of likely clinical scenarios, MCED testing was estimated to be cost-effective, improving survival and reducing treatment costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"30 12\",\"pages\":\"e352-e358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多癌早期检测(MCED)可以早期诊断癌症,从而提高生存率并降低治疗成本。本研究评估了MCED检测加常规护理(UC)筛查的成本效益,同时考虑了临床不确定性和人群异质性对广泛覆盖实体癌发病率的MCED检测的影响。研究设计:在美国成年人群中,MCED检测加UC与单独UC的成本-效果分析。方法:一个混合队列水平的模型比较了从美国支付款人的角度来看,在50至79岁的个体中,每年MCED检测加UC与单独UC检测癌症的效果。进行敏感性和情景分析,以探讨评估MCED的关键临床不确定性和人群异质性的影响,包括通过无细胞DNA检测状态的差异生存,癌症进展率,以及该测试如何可能在临床实践中实施。结果:在10万名患者中,与单独UC相比,MCED检测加UC在诊断时将7200例癌症转移到早期阶段,导致每人筛查额外0.14个质量调整生命年(QALYs)和5241美元的治疗成本节约,并且在949美元的检测价格下获得了66,048美元/QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)。在临床不确定性分析中,差异生存对成本-效果的影响最大。在概率敏感性分析中,MCED检测加UC在所有分析中都具有成本效益,最大ICER为91,092美元/QALY。结论:在一系列可能的临床情况下,MCED检测估计具有成本效益,可以提高生存率并降低治疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-effectiveness of a multicancer early detection test in the US.

Objectives: Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing could result in earlier cancer diagnosis, thereby improving survival and reducing treatment costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing plus usual care (UC) screening while accounting for the impact of clinical uncertainty and population heterogeneity for an MCED test with broad coverage of solid cancer incidence.

Study design: Cost-effectiveness analysis of MCED testing plus UC vs UC alone in an adult population in the US.

Methods: A hybrid cohort-level model compared annual MCED testing plus UC with UC alone in detecting cancer among individuals aged 50 to 79 years over a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of key clinical uncertainties and population heterogeneity in valuing MCED, including differential survival by cell-free DNA detectability status, cancer progression rate, and how the test is likely to be implemented in clinical practice.

Results: Among 100,000 individuals, MCED testing plus UC shifted 7200 cancers to earlier stages at diagnosis compared with UC alone, resulting in an additional 0.14 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and $5241 treatment cost savings per person screened and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $66,048/QALY gained at $949 test price. Among analyses of clinical uncertainties, differential survival had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MCED testing plus UC was cost-effective in all analyses with a maximum ICER of $91,092/QALY.

Conclusions: Under a range of likely clinical scenarios, MCED testing was estimated to be cost-effective, improving survival and reducing treatment costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Association between screening for suspected COVID-19 cases and outcomes of patients revisiting the emergency department. Cancellations in primary care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Collaboration to transition members to preferred formulary dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor. Effects of individualized nurse-led care plans on olaparib treatment duration. High-intensity home-based rehabilitation in a Medicare accountable care organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1