上肢痉挛患者重建手术的患者和提供者感知障碍。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.019
Sean R Cantwell, Peter C Rhee
{"title":"上肢痉挛患者重建手术的患者和提供者感知障碍。","authors":"Sean R Cantwell, Peter C Rhee","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The benefits of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery for patients with spastic deformities are well documented, but a small portion of eligible patients undergo surgery. We sought to determine perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery among brain injury patients and nonsurgical providers to identify potential barriers to surgical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records at a referral center were reviewed for patients diagnosed with upper limb spasticity following brain injury. A patient-specific survey was distributed by email to all eligible patients. An anonymous provider-specific electronic survey was distributed to the members of United States-based professional societies that routinely provide nonsurgical medical care to patients with spasticity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of 143 patients (30%) responded to the survey. All subjects underwent initial nonsurgical management for their spastic upper limbs, but only 19% (n = 8) underwent subsequent reconstructive upper-extremity surgery. Hesitancy to undergo surgery was primarily related to \"uncertainty regarding its benefits\" and \"fear of worsened postoperative function.\" Thirty-seven medical providers responded to the survey. Seventy-six percent (n = 28) saw more than 10 patients afflicted with spasticity annually, but 83% referred fewer than 10 patients for surgical evaluation. Barriers to referral included \"uncertainty regarding procedure effectiveness\" (58%), \"concerns regarding insurance approval\" (56%), \"uncertainty whether a patient is a surgical candidate\" (53%), and \"no relationship with an upper extremity surgeon\" (39%) for referral.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgery is infrequently performed among brain injury patients with spastic upper limb deformities. Patients report unfamiliarity with surgical options and concerns regarding surgical risks and benefits. Nonsurgical providers describe uncertainty regarding surgical efficacy and candidacy and underdeveloped referral networks.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgical treatment of upper-extremity spasticity following brain injury is infrequently provided to eligible patients. Patient and provider perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery may help identify the factors that underlie the relative infrequency of surgical treatment and suggest opportunities to optimize the delivery of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient- and Provider-Perceived Barriers to Reconstructive Surgery for Patients With Upper Limb Spasticity.\",\"authors\":\"Sean R Cantwell, Peter C Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The benefits of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery for patients with spastic deformities are well documented, but a small portion of eligible patients undergo surgery. We sought to determine perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery among brain injury patients and nonsurgical providers to identify potential barriers to surgical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records at a referral center were reviewed for patients diagnosed with upper limb spasticity following brain injury. A patient-specific survey was distributed by email to all eligible patients. An anonymous provider-specific electronic survey was distributed to the members of United States-based professional societies that routinely provide nonsurgical medical care to patients with spasticity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of 143 patients (30%) responded to the survey. All subjects underwent initial nonsurgical management for their spastic upper limbs, but only 19% (n = 8) underwent subsequent reconstructive upper-extremity surgery. Hesitancy to undergo surgery was primarily related to \\\"uncertainty regarding its benefits\\\" and \\\"fear of worsened postoperative function.\\\" Thirty-seven medical providers responded to the survey. Seventy-six percent (n = 28) saw more than 10 patients afflicted with spasticity annually, but 83% referred fewer than 10 patients for surgical evaluation. Barriers to referral included \\\"uncertainty regarding procedure effectiveness\\\" (58%), \\\"concerns regarding insurance approval\\\" (56%), \\\"uncertainty whether a patient is a surgical candidate\\\" (53%), and \\\"no relationship with an upper extremity surgeon\\\" (39%) for referral.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgery is infrequently performed among brain injury patients with spastic upper limb deformities. Patients report unfamiliarity with surgical options and concerns regarding surgical risks and benefits. Nonsurgical providers describe uncertainty regarding surgical efficacy and candidacy and underdeveloped referral networks.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgical treatment of upper-extremity spasticity following brain injury is infrequently provided to eligible patients. Patient and provider perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery may help identify the factors that underlie the relative infrequency of surgical treatment and suggest opportunities to optimize the delivery of surgical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:上肢重建手术对痉挛性畸形患者的益处有很好的文献记载,但一小部分符合条件的患者接受了手术。我们试图确定脑损伤患者和非手术提供者对上肢重建手术的看法,以确定手术评估的潜在障碍。方法:回顾转诊中心诊断为脑损伤后上肢痉挛患者的电子病历。通过电子邮件向所有符合条件的患者分发了一份针对患者的调查。一项针对特定提供者的匿名电子调查被分发给美国专业协会的成员,这些协会通常为痉挛患者提供非手术医疗护理。结果:143例患者中有43例(30%)有应答。所有患者的上肢痉挛都接受了最初的非手术治疗,但只有19% (n = 8)的患者接受了随后的上肢重建手术。犹豫接受手术主要与“不确定其益处”和“担心术后功能恶化”有关。37家医疗机构回应了这项调查。76%的患者(n = 28)每年有10例以上的痉挛患者,但83%的患者接受手术评估少于10例。转诊的障碍包括“手术效果的不确定性”(58%),“对保险批准的担忧”(56%),“不确定患者是否适合手术”(53%),以及“与上肢外科医生没有关系”(39%)。结论:颅脑损伤伴痉挛性上肢畸形患者不常行手术治疗。患者报告不熟悉手术选择和对手术风险和收益的担忧。非手术提供者描述了手术疗效和候选资格的不确定性以及不发达的转诊网络。临床相关性:脑损伤后上肢痉挛的手术治疗很少提供给符合条件的患者。患者和医生对上肢重建手术的认知可能有助于确定导致手术治疗相对较少的因素,并提出优化手术护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient- and Provider-Perceived Barriers to Reconstructive Surgery for Patients With Upper Limb Spasticity.

Purpose: The benefits of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery for patients with spastic deformities are well documented, but a small portion of eligible patients undergo surgery. We sought to determine perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery among brain injury patients and nonsurgical providers to identify potential barriers to surgical evaluation.

Methods: Electronic medical records at a referral center were reviewed for patients diagnosed with upper limb spasticity following brain injury. A patient-specific survey was distributed by email to all eligible patients. An anonymous provider-specific electronic survey was distributed to the members of United States-based professional societies that routinely provide nonsurgical medical care to patients with spasticity.

Results: Forty-three of 143 patients (30%) responded to the survey. All subjects underwent initial nonsurgical management for their spastic upper limbs, but only 19% (n = 8) underwent subsequent reconstructive upper-extremity surgery. Hesitancy to undergo surgery was primarily related to "uncertainty regarding its benefits" and "fear of worsened postoperative function." Thirty-seven medical providers responded to the survey. Seventy-six percent (n = 28) saw more than 10 patients afflicted with spasticity annually, but 83% referred fewer than 10 patients for surgical evaluation. Barriers to referral included "uncertainty regarding procedure effectiveness" (58%), "concerns regarding insurance approval" (56%), "uncertainty whether a patient is a surgical candidate" (53%), and "no relationship with an upper extremity surgeon" (39%) for referral.

Conclusions: Surgery is infrequently performed among brain injury patients with spastic upper limb deformities. Patients report unfamiliarity with surgical options and concerns regarding surgical risks and benefits. Nonsurgical providers describe uncertainty regarding surgical efficacy and candidacy and underdeveloped referral networks.

Clinical relevance: Surgical treatment of upper-extremity spasticity following brain injury is infrequently provided to eligible patients. Patient and provider perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery may help identify the factors that underlie the relative infrequency of surgical treatment and suggest opportunities to optimize the delivery of surgical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Palmar Radiocarpal Artery Vascularized Bone Graft with Alternatives for Unstable Scaphoid Nonunions: A Retrospective Analysis. Tendon Inversion Improves Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Bicep Tenodesis Model. Incidence and Presentation of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary Metacarpophalangeal and Proximal Interphalangeal Arthroplasty. The Displaced Fleck Sign: Description of a Radiographic Finding Consistent with Grade III Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears with Stener Lesions. Time to Recovery of Radial Nerve Palsy After Surgically Treated Humeral Shaft Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1