高血压强化治疗对心血管事件的影响,适用于美国中老年高血压患者。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae474
Nicola M Shen, Amal A Wanigatunga, Erin D Michos, Walter T Ambrosius, Catherine R Lesko
{"title":"高血压强化治疗对心血管事件的影响,适用于美国中老年高血压患者。","authors":"Nicola M Shen, Amal A Wanigatunga, Erin D Michos, Walter T Ambrosius, Catherine R Lesko","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) estimated the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure treatment (target <120 mm Hg) compared to standard (<140 mm Hg) on the risk of cardiovascular events in adults aged 50 years and older. Clinical trial participants may differ from an intervention's target population. We generalized the SPRINT results to US adults who would qualify for treatment under SPRINT eligibility criteria. We applied these eligibility criteria to participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018 to describe the target population. We estimated Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier risk curves, weighted with the inverse odds of sampling, to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 5-year risk differences for the effect of intensive treatment on cardiovascular and adverse events in the target population. The HR for cardiovascular disease events was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53, 1.08) comparing intensive to standard treatment, which is consistent with the estimates from the original SPRINT trial. The 5-year risk difference for a cardiovascular event was $-$2.2% (95% CI: $-$5.3%, 1.6%). The HR for serious adverse events was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.13). Despite differences between the SPRINT and target populations, we estimated a similar benefit of intensive treatment and similar rates of SAEs, in the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"3185-3194"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of intensive treatment of hypertension on cardiovascular events, generalized to middle-aged to older Americans living with hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola M Shen, Amal A Wanigatunga, Erin D Michos, Walter T Ambrosius, Catherine R Lesko\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) estimated the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure treatment (target <120 mm Hg) compared to standard (<140 mm Hg) on the risk of cardiovascular events in adults aged 50 years and older. Clinical trial participants may differ from an intervention's target population. We generalized the SPRINT results to US adults who would qualify for treatment under SPRINT eligibility criteria. We applied these eligibility criteria to participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018 to describe the target population. We estimated Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier risk curves, weighted with the inverse odds of sampling, to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 5-year risk differences for the effect of intensive treatment on cardiovascular and adverse events in the target population. The HR for cardiovascular disease events was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53, 1.08) comparing intensive to standard treatment, which is consistent with the estimates from the original SPRINT trial. The 5-year risk difference for a cardiovascular event was $-$2.2% (95% CI: $-$5.3%, 1.6%). The HR for serious adverse events was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.13). Despite differences between the SPRINT and target populations, we estimated a similar benefit of intensive treatment and similar rates of SAEs, in the target population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3185-3194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)评估了强化收缩压治疗的效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of intensive treatment of hypertension on cardiovascular events, generalized to middle-aged to older Americans living with hypertension.

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) estimated the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure treatment (target <120 mm Hg) compared to standard (<140 mm Hg) on the risk of cardiovascular events in adults aged 50 years and older. Clinical trial participants may differ from an intervention's target population. We generalized the SPRINT results to US adults who would qualify for treatment under SPRINT eligibility criteria. We applied these eligibility criteria to participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018 to describe the target population. We estimated Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier risk curves, weighted with the inverse odds of sampling, to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 5-year risk differences for the effect of intensive treatment on cardiovascular and adverse events in the target population. The HR for cardiovascular disease events was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53, 1.08) comparing intensive to standard treatment, which is consistent with the estimates from the original SPRINT trial. The 5-year risk difference for a cardiovascular event was $-$2.2% (95% CI: $-$5.3%, 1.6%). The HR for serious adverse events was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.13). Despite differences between the SPRINT and target populations, we estimated a similar benefit of intensive treatment and similar rates of SAEs, in the target population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Streetview greenspace types and dementia risk in older adults: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Letter to the Editor Regarding "How Choice of Effect Measure Influences Minimally Sufficient Adjustment Sets for External Validity" by Webster-Clark and Keil (2023): The Covariate Class Taxonomy Should Be Strictly Defined With Respect To The Full Set Of Potential Outcome-Generating Covariates. Bidirectional associations of screen time with externalizing and internalizing behaviors in children: a random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Road traffic crashes after implementation of the congestion relief zone in new York City. Possible selection bias in Mendelian randomization studies: effect of body mass index on breast cancer as an example.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1