前额提升与前额交叉头皮锚固。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae253
Mehmet Gencer, Yunus Sağlam, Burak Ergün Tatar, Metin Kerem
{"title":"前额提升与前额交叉头皮锚固。","authors":"Mehmet Gencer, Yunus Sağlam, Burak Ergün Tatar, Metin Kerem","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past decade, facial aesthetics has gained popularity, with a notable increase in upper-face lift procedures. Despite the popularity of brows and forehead lifts, the optimal fixation technique remains controversial. Common methods involve suturing of the temporal fascia or using monocortical miniscrews anchored to the frontal bone. Other options include the use of microscrews, percutaneous fixation posts, Kirschner wires, Mitek anchors, Endotine devices, bone tunnels, miniplates, and fibrin glue. This study introduces a new technique that transmits the pulling force directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection using the scalp as a suspension point.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To present a method in which pulling force is transmitted directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection, utilizing the scalp as a suspension point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 129 patients who underwent surgery between May 2022 and June 2023. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up, irregular follow-up, or a history of botulinum toxin or brow contouring were excluded. Preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs were evaluated using the Brow Positioning Grading Scale (BPGS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No persistent dimples were observed, with resolution within four weeks. Postoperative edema, erythema, and bruising resolved within six days. Complications, including chemosis, stitch-site infections, muscle weakness, paresthesia, and asymmetry, were all resolved. Significant improvements in eyebrow height and BPGS scores were noted at the 12-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technique offers a natural upper face rejuvenation option that is particularly suitable for patients with lower brow positions or advanced age.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forehead Lift With Cross-Frontal Scalp Anchorage.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Gencer, Yunus Sağlam, Burak Ergün Tatar, Metin Kerem\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past decade, facial aesthetics has gained popularity, with a notable increase in upper-face lift procedures. Despite the popularity of brows and forehead lifts, the optimal fixation technique remains controversial. Common methods involve suturing of the temporal fascia or using monocortical miniscrews anchored to the frontal bone. Other options include the use of microscrews, percutaneous fixation posts, Kirschner wires, Mitek anchors, Endotine devices, bone tunnels, miniplates, and fibrin glue. This study introduces a new technique that transmits the pulling force directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection using the scalp as a suspension point.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To present a method in which pulling force is transmitted directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection, utilizing the scalp as a suspension point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 129 patients who underwent surgery between May 2022 and June 2023. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up, irregular follow-up, or a history of botulinum toxin or brow contouring were excluded. Preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs were evaluated using the Brow Positioning Grading Scale (BPGS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No persistent dimples were observed, with resolution within four weeks. Postoperative edema, erythema, and bruising resolved within six days. Complications, including chemosis, stitch-site infections, muscle weakness, paresthesia, and asymmetry, were all resolved. Significant improvements in eyebrow height and BPGS scores were noted at the 12-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technique offers a natural upper face rejuvenation option that is particularly suitable for patients with lower brow positions or advanced age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae253\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年里,面部美容越来越受欢迎,上面部拉皮手术显著增加。尽管眉毛和前额提拉术很流行,但最佳固定技术仍然存在争议。常用的方法包括缝合颞筋膜或使用固定在额骨上的单皮质微型螺钉。其他选择包括使用微螺钉、经皮固定桩、克氏针、Mitek锚、Endotine装置、骨隧道、微型钢板和纤维蛋白胶。本研究介绍了一种新技术,通过骨膜下剥离将拉力直接传递到额头/前额皮肤,并将头皮作为悬浮点。目的:提出一种利用头皮作为悬吊点,通过骨膜下剥离将拉力直接传递到额头皮肤的方法。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2022年5月至2023年6月期间接受手术的129例患者。随访时间少于12个月、随访不规律、有肉毒杆菌毒素史或眉型修容史的患者被排除在外。术前和术后12个月的照片使用眉毛定位分级量表(BPGS)进行评估。结果:未见持续凹陷,四周内消退。术后水肿、红斑和瘀伤在6天内消失。包括化脓、缝合部位感染、肌肉无力、感觉异常和不对称等并发症均得到解决。在12个月的随访中,眉毛高度和BPGS评分显著改善。结论:该技术提供了一种自然的上面部年轻化选择,特别适用于下眉位置或高龄患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forehead Lift With Cross-Frontal Scalp Anchorage.

Background: Over the past decade, facial aesthetics has gained popularity, with a notable increase in upper-face lift procedures. Despite the popularity of brows and forehead lifts, the optimal fixation technique remains controversial. Common methods involve suturing of the temporal fascia or using monocortical miniscrews anchored to the frontal bone. Other options include the use of microscrews, percutaneous fixation posts, Kirschner wires, Mitek anchors, Endotine devices, bone tunnels, miniplates, and fibrin glue. This study introduces a new technique that transmits the pulling force directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection using the scalp as a suspension point.

Objectives: To present a method in which pulling force is transmitted directly to the brow/forehead skin through subperiosteal dissection, utilizing the scalp as a suspension point.

Methods: This retrospective study included 129 patients who underwent surgery between May 2022 and June 2023. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up, irregular follow-up, or a history of botulinum toxin or brow contouring were excluded. Preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs were evaluated using the Brow Positioning Grading Scale (BPGS).

Results: No persistent dimples were observed, with resolution within four weeks. Postoperative edema, erythema, and bruising resolved within six days. Complications, including chemosis, stitch-site infections, muscle weakness, paresthesia, and asymmetry, were all resolved. Significant improvements in eyebrow height and BPGS scores were noted at the 12-month follow-up visit.

Conclusions: This technique offers a natural upper face rejuvenation option that is particularly suitable for patients with lower brow positions or advanced age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Arterioembolic Characteristics of Differentially Diluted CaHA-CMC Gels Within an Artificial Macrovascular Perfusion Model. The Occurrence of Health Symptoms in General Practice Before and After the Explantation of Cosmetic Breast Implants. Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout. IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1