Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice
{"title":"将经济证据纳入临床指南:美国医师学会临床指南委员会的框架。","authors":"Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"241-248"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating Economic Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: A Framework From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice, Carolyn J Crandall, Lauri A Hicks, Timothy J Wilt, Ethan M Balk, Thomas G Cooney, J Thomas Cross, Nick Fitterman, Johanna Lewis, Jennifer S Lin, Amy Linsky, Michael Maroto, Matthew C Miller, Adam J Obley, Paul Shekelle, Janice E Tufte, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Curtis S Harrod, Jennifer Yost, Amir Qaseem, Tatyana Shamliyan, Carolyn J Crandall, Douglas K Owens, Jeffrey A Tice\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"241-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incorporating Economic Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: A Framework From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
In recognition of accelerating health care spending and alignment with the American College of Physicians (ACP) principles of promoting high-value care, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) developed a framework to standardize its approach to identifying, appraising, and considering economic evidence in the development of ACP clinical guidelines. This article presents the CGC's process for incorporating economic evidence, which encompasses cost-effectiveness analyses, economic outcomes in randomized controlled trials, and resource utilization (intervention cost) data. Economic evidence is one component of ACP recommendations. The CGC first and foremost assesses the certainty of evidence for clinical net benefit of interventions; it then considers patient values and preferences, and only then considers economic evidence to develop recommendations.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.