促进Cobb角≥90度的严重青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者进行单阶段后路脊柱融合术(PSF)的恢复:评估快速恢复方案(RRP)的可行性

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001755
Saturveithan Chandirasegaran, Chris Yin Wei Chan, Chee Kidd Chiu, Siti Mariam Mohamad, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Mun Keong Kwan
{"title":"促进Cobb角≥90度的严重青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者进行单阶段后路脊柱融合术(PSF)的恢复:评估快速恢复方案(RRP)的可行性","authors":"Saturveithan Chandirasegaran, Chris Yin Wei Chan, Chee Kidd Chiu, Siti Mariam Mohamad, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Mun Keong Kwan","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and outcome of rapid recovery protocol (RRP) in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Cobb angle ≥90 degrees underwent single-staged posterior spinal fusion (PSF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Corrective surgeries in severe AIS patients entail a higher risk of prolonged operation, excessive bleeding, extended hospital stay, and higher complication rates compared with non-severe AIS patients. Implementation of RRP among severe AIS patients has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven severe AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF surgery from 2019 to 2022 were recruited. The RRP consisted of a preoperative regime and counselling, intraoperative strategies to reduce operation duration and blood loss and an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation pathway. Outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine usage, length of hospital stay, and recovery milestones. Descriptive statistics were reported in mean (SD) for numerical data, whereas categorical data were presented in n (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operation duration was 173.5±39.4 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 1064.6±473.3 mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2±0.6 days. Twelve hours post-operation pain score was 4.0±2.0 and reduced to 3.9±1.6 at 48 hours. 78.4% of patients discontinued their PCA at 48 hours. First liquid intake was at 6.3±8.5 hours, whereas solid food consumption was initiated at 23.4±14.2 hours. The urinary catheter was removed at 17.8±7.6 hours. Patients started ambulation at 24±12.7 hours, first passed flatus at 37.7±20.4 hours and had their first bowel movement at 122.1±41.7 hours. Three complications (8.1%) were reported, which included superficial surgical site infection, proximal wound stitch abscess and superficial thermal injury due to forced air-warming blanket.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the RRP after PSF in severe AIS patients was feasible and resulted in a short postoperative hospital stay of 3.2 days without increasing the risk of major complications, readmissions, and reoperations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Recovery in Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients With Cobb Angle ≥90 Degrees Undergoing Single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF): Evaluating the Feasibility of Rapid Recovery Protocol (RRP).\",\"authors\":\"Saturveithan Chandirasegaran, Chris Yin Wei Chan, Chee Kidd Chiu, Siti Mariam Mohamad, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Mun Keong Kwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and outcome of rapid recovery protocol (RRP) in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Cobb angle ≥90 degrees underwent single-staged posterior spinal fusion (PSF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Corrective surgeries in severe AIS patients entail a higher risk of prolonged operation, excessive bleeding, extended hospital stay, and higher complication rates compared with non-severe AIS patients. Implementation of RRP among severe AIS patients has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven severe AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF surgery from 2019 to 2022 were recruited. The RRP consisted of a preoperative regime and counselling, intraoperative strategies to reduce operation duration and blood loss and an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation pathway. Outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine usage, length of hospital stay, and recovery milestones. Descriptive statistics were reported in mean (SD) for numerical data, whereas categorical data were presented in n (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operation duration was 173.5±39.4 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 1064.6±473.3 mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2±0.6 days. Twelve hours post-operation pain score was 4.0±2.0 and reduced to 3.9±1.6 at 48 hours. 78.4% of patients discontinued their PCA at 48 hours. First liquid intake was at 6.3±8.5 hours, whereas solid food consumption was initiated at 23.4±14.2 hours. The urinary catheter was removed at 17.8±7.6 hours. Patients started ambulation at 24±12.7 hours, first passed flatus at 37.7±20.4 hours and had their first bowel movement at 122.1±41.7 hours. Three complications (8.1%) were reported, which included superficial surgical site infection, proximal wound stitch abscess and superficial thermal injury due to forced air-warming blanket.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the RRP after PSF in severe AIS patients was feasible and resulted in a short postoperative hospital stay of 3.2 days without increasing the risk of major complications, readmissions, and reoperations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001755\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性研究:评估快速恢复方案(RRP)在Cobb角≥90度的严重青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者中的可行性和结果:与非重度 AIS 患者相比,重度 AIS 患者的矫正手术具有手术时间长、出血多、住院时间长和并发症发生率高等风险。在重度 AIS 患者中实施 RRP 的情况尚未见报道:招募了 37 名在 2019 年至 2022 年期间接受单期 PSF 手术的重度 AIS 患者。RRP包括术前制度和咨询、减少手术时间和失血量的术中策略以及术后加速康复路径。结果测量指标包括手术时间、失血量、术后疼痛评分、患者自控镇痛(PCA)吗啡用量、住院时间和康复里程碑。数字数据的描述性统计以平均值(SD)表示,而分类数据则以n(%)表示:平均手术时间为(173.5±39.4)分钟,平均失血量为(1064.6±473.3)毫升。术后平均住院时间为(3.2±0.6)天。术后 12 小时疼痛评分为 4.0±2.0,48 小时后降至 3.9±1.6。78.4%的患者在 48 小时后停止使用 PCA。首次进食液体的时间为 6.3±8.5 小时,而进食固体食物的时间为 23.4±14.2 小时。导尿管在 17.8±7.6 小时时拔除。患者在24±12.7小时时开始活动,在37.7±20.4小时时首次排便,在122.1±41.7小时时首次排便。报告的并发症有3例(8.1%),包括浅表手术部位感染、近端伤口缝合脓肿和强制空气加温毯导致的浅表热损伤:结论:在重度 AIS 患者 PSF 术后实施 RRP 是可行的,术后住院时间短,仅为 3.2 天,不会增加主要并发症、再入院和再次手术的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Recovery in Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients With Cobb Angle ≥90 Degrees Undergoing Single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF): Evaluating the Feasibility of Rapid Recovery Protocol (RRP).

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and outcome of rapid recovery protocol (RRP) in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Cobb angle ≥90 degrees underwent single-staged posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

Summary of background data: Corrective surgeries in severe AIS patients entail a higher risk of prolonged operation, excessive bleeding, extended hospital stay, and higher complication rates compared with non-severe AIS patients. Implementation of RRP among severe AIS patients has not been reported.

Methods: Thirty-seven severe AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF surgery from 2019 to 2022 were recruited. The RRP consisted of a preoperative regime and counselling, intraoperative strategies to reduce operation duration and blood loss and an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation pathway. Outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine usage, length of hospital stay, and recovery milestones. Descriptive statistics were reported in mean (SD) for numerical data, whereas categorical data were presented in n (%).

Results: The mean operation duration was 173.5±39.4 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 1064.6±473.3 mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2±0.6 days. Twelve hours post-operation pain score was 4.0±2.0 and reduced to 3.9±1.6 at 48 hours. 78.4% of patients discontinued their PCA at 48 hours. First liquid intake was at 6.3±8.5 hours, whereas solid food consumption was initiated at 23.4±14.2 hours. The urinary catheter was removed at 17.8±7.6 hours. Patients started ambulation at 24±12.7 hours, first passed flatus at 37.7±20.4 hours and had their first bowel movement at 122.1±41.7 hours. Three complications (8.1%) were reported, which included superficial surgical site infection, proximal wound stitch abscess and superficial thermal injury due to forced air-warming blanket.

Conclusion: The implementation of the RRP after PSF in severe AIS patients was feasible and resulted in a short postoperative hospital stay of 3.2 days without increasing the risk of major complications, readmissions, and reoperations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Ligamentous Augmentation to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Characterization of Lumbar Lordosis: Influence of Age, Sex, Vertebral Body Wedging, and L4-S1. Motion Capture-based 3-Dimensional Measurement of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Cervical Laminoplasty. Stopping at C2 Versus C3/4 in Elective Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Preoperative Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Utilization and Postoperative Complications in ACDF, PCDF, and Decompression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1