北印度某医学院生物化学课程两种不同教学方法对MBBS学生反馈的比较研究

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_160_24
Vaneet Kaur, Shalini Gupta, Ashish Goel, Neelam Lakha, Sumeet Kaur
{"title":"北印度某医学院生物化学课程两种不同教学方法对MBBS学生反馈的比较研究","authors":"Vaneet Kaur, Shalini Gupta, Ashish Goel, Neelam Lakha, Sumeet Kaur","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_160_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delivering feedback to students who have just joined a new course is relevant for it may help them to understand their subject better and hence enhance their performance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to provide feedback to students using two different techniques: the sandwich method and the Ask-Tell-Ask method. It also evaluated students' perceptions of the feedback and assessed the quality of the feedback provided.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study was a prospective randomized study conducted in the department of biochemistry with 1<sup>st</sup>-year MBBS students from August 2022 to November 2022. Students were divided into two groups based on their midterm marks: 58 students who scored more than 50% received collective feedback, while 41 students who scored <50% received feedback individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in midterm marks obtained by students of the group which was provided feedback individually compared to the other group which received collective feedback was statistically significant (<i>P</i> ˂ 0.000). After applying the intervention, the mean marks obtained by the group who received the individual feedback increased by 12.35 ± 17.57. This lead to a decreased difference in the mean marks between both the groups although it still remained statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.0004). However, no statistical difference has been observed in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty provided the feedback as determined by the one-way analysis of variance (<i>P</i> = 0.8). The perceptions of students regarding the provided feedback and the quality of the feedback taken with the help of two different questionnaires revealed that 75.5% of students felt that the feedback provided was relevant and related to the topic. The feedback was provided within 2 weeks (75.3%) of conducting the test. About 75.6% of students felt that they got motivated for working hard. About 65.9% of students feel that providing feedback should be made a norm in the institute.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that providing individual feedback increased the mean marks of students with no statistical difference in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty member provided the feedback. The students perceived the feedback as relevant, timely (provided within 2 weeks of the test), and related to their performance. They felt that the culture of delivering feedback should be made an institutional norm.</p>","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"14 4","pages":"220-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11691108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Giving Feedback to MBBS Students by Two Different Techniques in Biochemistry in a Medical College in North India.\",\"authors\":\"Vaneet Kaur, Shalini Gupta, Ashish Goel, Neelam Lakha, Sumeet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_160_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delivering feedback to students who have just joined a new course is relevant for it may help them to understand their subject better and hence enhance their performance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to provide feedback to students using two different techniques: the sandwich method and the Ask-Tell-Ask method. It also evaluated students' perceptions of the feedback and assessed the quality of the feedback provided.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study was a prospective randomized study conducted in the department of biochemistry with 1<sup>st</sup>-year MBBS students from August 2022 to November 2022. Students were divided into two groups based on their midterm marks: 58 students who scored more than 50% received collective feedback, while 41 students who scored <50% received feedback individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in midterm marks obtained by students of the group which was provided feedback individually compared to the other group which received collective feedback was statistically significant (<i>P</i> ˂ 0.000). After applying the intervention, the mean marks obtained by the group who received the individual feedback increased by 12.35 ± 17.57. This lead to a decreased difference in the mean marks between both the groups although it still remained statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.0004). However, no statistical difference has been observed in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty provided the feedback as determined by the one-way analysis of variance (<i>P</i> = 0.8). The perceptions of students regarding the provided feedback and the quality of the feedback taken with the help of two different questionnaires revealed that 75.5% of students felt that the feedback provided was relevant and related to the topic. The feedback was provided within 2 weeks (75.3%) of conducting the test. About 75.6% of students felt that they got motivated for working hard. About 65.9% of students feel that providing feedback should be made a norm in the institute.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that providing individual feedback increased the mean marks of students with no statistical difference in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty member provided the feedback. The students perceived the feedback as relevant, timely (provided within 2 weeks of the test), and related to their performance. They felt that the culture of delivering feedback should be made an institutional norm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"220-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11691108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_160_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_160_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本研究旨在使用两种不同的方法向学生提供反馈:三明治法和问-答法。材料和方法:本研究是一项前瞻性随机研究:本研究是一项前瞻性随机研究,于 2022 年 8 月至 2022 年 11 月在生物化学系对 MBBS 一年级学生进行了研究。根据期中考试分数将学生分为两组:58 名分数超过 50%的学生接受集体反馈,41 名分数为结果的学生接受集体反馈:与接受集体反馈的另一组学生相比,接受单独反馈的一组学生的期中考试分数差异有统计学意义(P ˂0.000)。采取干预措施后,获得个别反馈的一组学生的平均分数提高了 12.35 ± 17.57。这导致两组之间的平均分差异减小,但仍有统计学意义(P = 0.0004)。然而,根据单因素方差分析的结果(P = 0.8),由哪位教师提供反馈,平均分数的增量没有统计学差异。通过两份不同的问卷调查了学生对反馈意见的看法和反馈意见的质量,结果显示 75.5%的学生认为所提供的反馈意见与主题相关。反馈是在测试后两周内提供的(75.3%)。约 75.6% 的学生认为他们在努力学习后得到了激励。约 65.9% 的学生认为,应将提供反馈作为学院的一项规范:研究发现,提供个别反馈提高了学生的平均分数,但提供反馈的教师不同,平均分数的提高幅度没有统计学差异。学生们认为反馈是相关的、及时的(在考试后两周内提供),并且与他们的成绩相关。他们认为,提供反馈的文化应成为一种制度规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Giving Feedback to MBBS Students by Two Different Techniques in Biochemistry in a Medical College in North India.

Background: Delivering feedback to students who have just joined a new course is relevant for it may help them to understand their subject better and hence enhance their performance.

Aim: The present study aimed to provide feedback to students using two different techniques: the sandwich method and the Ask-Tell-Ask method. It also evaluated students' perceptions of the feedback and assessed the quality of the feedback provided.

Materials and methods: The present study was a prospective randomized study conducted in the department of biochemistry with 1st-year MBBS students from August 2022 to November 2022. Students were divided into two groups based on their midterm marks: 58 students who scored more than 50% received collective feedback, while 41 students who scored <50% received feedback individually.

Results: The difference in midterm marks obtained by students of the group which was provided feedback individually compared to the other group which received collective feedback was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.000). After applying the intervention, the mean marks obtained by the group who received the individual feedback increased by 12.35 ± 17.57. This lead to a decreased difference in the mean marks between both the groups although it still remained statistically significant (P = 0.0004). However, no statistical difference has been observed in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty provided the feedback as determined by the one-way analysis of variance (P = 0.8). The perceptions of students regarding the provided feedback and the quality of the feedback taken with the help of two different questionnaires revealed that 75.5% of students felt that the feedback provided was relevant and related to the topic. The feedback was provided within 2 weeks (75.3%) of conducting the test. About 75.6% of students felt that they got motivated for working hard. About 65.9% of students feel that providing feedback should be made a norm in the institute.

Conclusions: The study found that providing individual feedback increased the mean marks of students with no statistical difference in the mean increment of marks based on which faculty member provided the feedback. The students perceived the feedback as relevant, timely (provided within 2 weeks of the test), and related to their performance. They felt that the culture of delivering feedback should be made an institutional norm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Acquisition of Certifiable Competencies in Undergraduate Medical Curriculum of National Medical Commission: Role of Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice. Adapting a Longitudinal Structured Program to Enhance Research Skills in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Key Advancement in Competency-Based Medical Education. Assessing the Effectiveness of Student-generated Scenario-based Questions as a Tool for Active Learning. Challenges in Implementing Competency-based Medical Education in India - Stakeholders' Perspective: A Mixed-method Analysis. Comparative Analysis of Impact of Different Skill-training Methods among Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1