什么时候医生应该轻推?轻推和偏好敏感护理。

IF 3.3 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1136/jme-2024-110268
Ainar Miyata
{"title":"什么时候医生应该轻推?轻推和偏好敏感护理。","authors":"Ainar Miyata","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When should doctors nudge their patients towards the treatments they think are best? If the nudge is compatible with the patient giving informed consent, then the nudge could be permissible. To be compatible with informed consent, the nudge must, at minimum: (1) not make the patient's understanding worse and (2) not make it hard for the patient to resist consenting. Arguably, many nudges will meet these criteria. However, since unjustified nudging, in this context, would also be unjustified paternalism, the permissibility of nudging hinges on whether it is justified. Perhaps surprisingly, this is often not the case. In situations where the best medical judgement does not conclusively favour a single course of action but there are multiple viable options, patient preference ought to be the deciding factor. In such contexts of <i>preference-sensitive care</i>, there is no good reason for doctors to nudge the patient towards a specific course of action, and hence, nudging is unjustified. Outside such contexts, nudging may be both justified and permissible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When should doctors nudge? Nudging and preference-sensitive care.\",\"authors\":\"Ainar Miyata\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jme-2024-110268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When should doctors nudge their patients towards the treatments they think are best? If the nudge is compatible with the patient giving informed consent, then the nudge could be permissible. To be compatible with informed consent, the nudge must, at minimum: (1) not make the patient's understanding worse and (2) not make it hard for the patient to resist consenting. Arguably, many nudges will meet these criteria. However, since unjustified nudging, in this context, would also be unjustified paternalism, the permissibility of nudging hinges on whether it is justified. Perhaps surprisingly, this is often not the case. In situations where the best medical judgement does not conclusively favour a single course of action but there are multiple viable options, patient preference ought to be the deciding factor. In such contexts of <i>preference-sensitive care</i>, there is no good reason for doctors to nudge the patient towards a specific course of action, and hence, nudging is unjustified. Outside such contexts, nudging may be both justified and permissible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生应该在什么时候促使病人接受他们认为最好的治疗?如果轻推与患者的知情同意相容,那么轻推是允许的。为了与知情同意相容,轻推必须至少:(1)不使患者的理解变得更糟;(2)不使患者难以抗拒同意。可以说,许多助推措施将符合这些标准。然而,由于在这种情况下,不合理的轻推也将是不合理的家长式作风,轻推的可接受性取决于它是否合理。也许令人惊讶的是,情况往往并非如此。在最好的医学判断不能确定地支持单一行动方案,但有多种可行选择的情况下,患者的偏好应该是决定性因素。在这种偏好敏感型护理的背景下,医生没有充分的理由推动病人采取特定的行动,因此,推动是不合理的。在这种情况下,轻推可能是合理的,也是允许的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When should doctors nudge? Nudging and preference-sensitive care.

When should doctors nudge their patients towards the treatments they think are best? If the nudge is compatible with the patient giving informed consent, then the nudge could be permissible. To be compatible with informed consent, the nudge must, at minimum: (1) not make the patient's understanding worse and (2) not make it hard for the patient to resist consenting. Arguably, many nudges will meet these criteria. However, since unjustified nudging, in this context, would also be unjustified paternalism, the permissibility of nudging hinges on whether it is justified. Perhaps surprisingly, this is often not the case. In situations where the best medical judgement does not conclusively favour a single course of action but there are multiple viable options, patient preference ought to be the deciding factor. In such contexts of preference-sensitive care, there is no good reason for doctors to nudge the patient towards a specific course of action, and hence, nudging is unjustified. Outside such contexts, nudging may be both justified and permissible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
期刊最新文献
Defending manic competence: a reply to Kane. Relational epistemic humility in the clinical encounter. The ethics of using virtual assistants to help people in vulnerable positions access care. Generational tobacco ban: questions of consistency. Beochaoineadh: grieving but not bereaved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1