脑脊液引流预防和治疗脊髓缺血和损伤的有效性和安全性:一项全面的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4
Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Ahmed Ali E Al Abdullah, Salem Ahmed S Alshehri, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Omar Ayed Alanazi, Safa Isa Alkhayyat, Bipin Chaurasia, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi
{"title":"脑脊液引流预防和治疗脊髓缺血和损伤的有效性和安全性:一项全面的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Ahmed Ali E Al Abdullah, Salem Ahmed S Alshehri, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Omar Ayed Alanazi, Safa Isa Alkhayyat, Bipin Chaurasia, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord ischemia and injury pose significant challenges in spinal surgery and traumatic events. Cerebrospinal drains are considered a potential intervention to mitigate these risks, although their efficacy and safety are uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies assessing the use of cerebrospinal drains in patients undergoing aortic surgeries. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The systematic review identified 34 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis conducted using open meta-analyst software revealed a significant effect of cerebrospinal drains on preventing spinal cord ischemia spinal cord injury The pooled odds ratio (OR) in double-arm studies was estimated to be 0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760). Additionally, the pooled estimate of single-arm studies was estimated to be 0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065). However, minimal heterogeneity was observed across studies.Cerebrospinal drains may play a role in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury, but further research is required to confirm their efficacy and safety. Additional well-designed studies are needed to determine the optimal use of cerebrospinal drains in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of Cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and Injury: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Ahmed Ali E Al Abdullah, Salem Ahmed S Alshehri, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Omar Ayed Alanazi, Safa Isa Alkhayyat, Bipin Chaurasia, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spinal cord ischemia and injury pose significant challenges in spinal surgery and traumatic events. Cerebrospinal drains are considered a potential intervention to mitigate these risks, although their efficacy and safety are uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies assessing the use of cerebrospinal drains in patients undergoing aortic surgeries. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The systematic review identified 34 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis conducted using open meta-analyst software revealed a significant effect of cerebrospinal drains on preventing spinal cord ischemia spinal cord injury The pooled odds ratio (OR) in double-arm studies was estimated to be 0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760). Additionally, the pooled estimate of single-arm studies was estimated to be 0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065). However, minimal heterogeneity was observed across studies.Cerebrospinal drains may play a role in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury, but further research is required to confirm their efficacy and safety. Additional well-designed studies are needed to determine the optimal use of cerebrospinal drains in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊髓缺血和损伤是脊柱外科和创伤性事件的重大挑战。脑脊液引流被认为是减轻这些风险的潜在干预措施,尽管其有效性和安全性尚不确定。我们进行了一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估脑脊液引流在预防和治疗脊髓缺血和损伤方面的有效性和安全性。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library等多个电子数据库,以确定相关研究。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、队列研究和评估主动脉手术患者使用脑脊液的观察性研究。数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人独立完成。系统评价确定了34项符合纳入标准的研究。采用开放荟萃分析软件进行的荟萃分析显示,脑脊液引流对预防脊髓缺血脊髓损伤有显著作用,双臂研究的合并优势比(OR)估计为0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760)。此外,单组研究的合并估计估计为0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065)。然而,在所有研究中观察到的异质性很小。脑脊液引流可能在预防和治疗脊髓缺血和损伤中发挥作用,但其有效性和安全性有待进一步研究证实。需要更多精心设计的研究来确定脑脊液引流在临床实践中的最佳应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of Cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and Injury: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spinal cord ischemia and injury pose significant challenges in spinal surgery and traumatic events. Cerebrospinal drains are considered a potential intervention to mitigate these risks, although their efficacy and safety are uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies assessing the use of cerebrospinal drains in patients undergoing aortic surgeries. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The systematic review identified 34 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis conducted using open meta-analyst software revealed a significant effect of cerebrospinal drains on preventing spinal cord ischemia spinal cord injury The pooled odds ratio (OR) in double-arm studies was estimated to be 0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760). Additionally, the pooled estimate of single-arm studies was estimated to be 0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065). However, minimal heterogeneity was observed across studies.Cerebrospinal drains may play a role in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury, but further research is required to confirm their efficacy and safety. Additional well-designed studies are needed to determine the optimal use of cerebrospinal drains in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Trends in mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to subarachnoid hemorrhage in South Asia (2000-2023). Transcranial orbital approaches: comparison of the surgical access and the importance of the zygomatic arch removal. Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for selected borden type III dural arteriovenous fistulas. Early pain relief and segmental realignment after two-stage lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior instrumentation in degenerative lumbar pathology. Lower deep-to-superficial extensor muscle ratio (DSR) as an independent risk factor for early titanium implant subsidence following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1