显微外科背根进入区损伤(DREZotomy)治疗脊髓顽固性神经性疼痛和马尾损伤的比较结果。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y
Bunpot Sitthinamsuwan, Tanawat Ounahachok, Sawanee Pumseenil, Sarun Nunta-Aree
{"title":"显微外科背根进入区损伤(DREZotomy)治疗脊髓顽固性神经性疼痛和马尾损伤的比较结果。","authors":"Bunpot Sitthinamsuwan, Tanawat Ounahachok, Sawanee Pumseenil, Sarun Nunta-Aree","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and cauda equina injury (CEI) remains challenging. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZL) or DREZotomy is a viable surgical option for refractory cases. This study aimed to compare DREZL surgical outcomes between patients with SCI and those with CEI and to identify predictors of postoperative pain relief. We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients (6 with SCI and 6 with CEI) with intractable neuropathic pain who underwent DREZL. The data collected were demographic characteristics, pain distribution, and outcomes assessed by numeric pain rating scores. Variables and percentages of pain improvement at 1 year and long-term were statistically compared between the SCI and CEI groups. The demographic characteristics and percentage of patients who experienced pain improvement at 1 year postoperatively did not differ between the groups. Compared with the SCI group, the CEI group presented significantly better long-term pain reduction (p = 0.020) and favorable operative outcomes (p = 0.015). Patients with border zone pain had significantly better long-term pain relief and outcomes than did those with diffuse pain (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively). Recurrent pain after DREZL occurred in the SCI group but not in the CEI group. DREZL provided superior pain relief in patients with CEI. The presence of border zone pain predicted favorable outcomes. CEI patients or SCI patients with border zone pain are good surgical candidates for DREZL, whereas SCI patients with below-injury diffuse pain are poor candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative outcomes of microsurgical dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZotomy) for intractable neuropathic pain in spinal cord and cauda equina injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Bunpot Sitthinamsuwan, Tanawat Ounahachok, Sawanee Pumseenil, Sarun Nunta-Aree\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and cauda equina injury (CEI) remains challenging. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZL) or DREZotomy is a viable surgical option for refractory cases. This study aimed to compare DREZL surgical outcomes between patients with SCI and those with CEI and to identify predictors of postoperative pain relief. We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients (6 with SCI and 6 with CEI) with intractable neuropathic pain who underwent DREZL. The data collected were demographic characteristics, pain distribution, and outcomes assessed by numeric pain rating scores. Variables and percentages of pain improvement at 1 year and long-term were statistically compared between the SCI and CEI groups. The demographic characteristics and percentage of patients who experienced pain improvement at 1 year postoperatively did not differ between the groups. Compared with the SCI group, the CEI group presented significantly better long-term pain reduction (p = 0.020) and favorable operative outcomes (p = 0.015). Patients with border zone pain had significantly better long-term pain relief and outcomes than did those with diffuse pain (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively). Recurrent pain after DREZL occurred in the SCI group but not in the CEI group. DREZL provided superior pain relief in patients with CEI. The presence of border zone pain predicted favorable outcomes. CEI patients or SCI patients with border zone pain are good surgical candidates for DREZL, whereas SCI patients with below-injury diffuse pain are poor candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊髓损伤(SCI)和马尾损伤(CEI)患者神经性疼痛的治疗仍然具有挑战性。背根进入区损伤(DREZL)或DREZotomy是难治性病例可行的手术选择。本研究旨在比较SCI患者和CEI患者的DREZL手术结果,并确定术后疼痛缓解的预测因素。我们回顾性分析了12例接受DREZL治疗的顽固性神经性疼痛患者(6例SCI和6例CEI)。收集的数据是人口统计学特征、疼痛分布和通过数字疼痛评分评估的结果。对SCI组和CEI组1年和长期疼痛改善的变量和百分比进行统计学比较。术后1年疼痛改善患者的人口学特征和百分比在两组之间没有差异。与SCI组相比,CEI组的长期疼痛减轻效果显著(p = 0.020),手术效果良好(p = 0.015)。边界区疼痛患者的长期疼痛缓解和预后明显优于弥漫性疼痛患者(p = 0.008和p = 0.010)。DREZL后复发性疼痛在SCI组出现,而在CEI组没有。DREZL为CEI患者提供了更好的疼痛缓解。边界区疼痛的存在预示着有利的结果。CEI患者或伴有边界区疼痛的SCI患者是DREZL手术的好选择,而伴有损伤下弥漫性疼痛的SCI患者则不适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative outcomes of microsurgical dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZotomy) for intractable neuropathic pain in spinal cord and cauda equina injuries.

Treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and cauda equina injury (CEI) remains challenging. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZL) or DREZotomy is a viable surgical option for refractory cases. This study aimed to compare DREZL surgical outcomes between patients with SCI and those with CEI and to identify predictors of postoperative pain relief. We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients (6 with SCI and 6 with CEI) with intractable neuropathic pain who underwent DREZL. The data collected were demographic characteristics, pain distribution, and outcomes assessed by numeric pain rating scores. Variables and percentages of pain improvement at 1 year and long-term were statistically compared between the SCI and CEI groups. The demographic characteristics and percentage of patients who experienced pain improvement at 1 year postoperatively did not differ between the groups. Compared with the SCI group, the CEI group presented significantly better long-term pain reduction (p = 0.020) and favorable operative outcomes (p = 0.015). Patients with border zone pain had significantly better long-term pain relief and outcomes than did those with diffuse pain (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively). Recurrent pain after DREZL occurred in the SCI group but not in the CEI group. DREZL provided superior pain relief in patients with CEI. The presence of border zone pain predicted favorable outcomes. CEI patients or SCI patients with border zone pain are good surgical candidates for DREZL, whereas SCI patients with below-injury diffuse pain are poor candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Transoral endoscopic approach to skull base lesions: A 10-year experience at a single tertiary center. Bilateral decompressive craniectomy in pediatric patients: A systematic review. Modified tubular retractor for deep brain tumour resection: enhanced surgical outcomes in resource-constrained settings. Management of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review of retrospective studies. Association between trajectory of intracranial pressure and all-cause mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1