牙科过敏及其潜在的辅助因素:一项病例对照研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b5907068
Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine
{"title":"牙科过敏及其潜在的辅助因素:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5907068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergies in dentistry and potential cofactors: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b5907068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"162-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5907068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5907068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在牙科手术过程中经常怀疑过敏反应。不过,有关已证实的过敏原的数据很少。本研究旨在确定牙科过敏原和致敏的潜在辅助因素。方法和材料:对2018年至2023年期间牙科(研究组)或外科(对照组)手术中疑似过敏反应的患者进行单中心3年回顾性和2年前瞻性文件图表分析。进行描述性统计和多元逻辑回归分析。结果:实验组129例,对照组123例。研究组确诊过敏发生率(10%)低于对照组(28%,P < 0.001)。局部麻醉剂(LA)引起大多数牙齿反应,但很少证实过敏(55例中有1例)。对照组牙体材料(DM)和种植体材料(IM)的临床相关敏化率分别为16%和15%。多元逻辑回归发现,LA或DM/IM的过敏反应风险分别降低33.33或2.63倍。在我们的队列中,伴随性免疫疾病与牙科确诊过敏反应的高风险相关(OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.4-35.1)。结论:口腔给药过敏是罕见的。洛杉矶引发的大多数反应都不具体。对牙科材料的反应导致客观症状需要过敏诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allergies in dentistry and potential cofactors: a case-control study.

Objective: Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.

Method and materials: Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.

Results: In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).

Conclusion: Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Bonding glass ceramic to human dentin: influence of immediate sealing and provisional cements. Investigation of the effectiveness of different suture materials used in impacted mandibular third molar extractions on wound healing and clinical features. Evaluating the hidden impact of interdental cleaning habits on maxillary anterior papilla integrity: a cross-sectional study. Mapping sequential patterns of periodontal breakdown using longitudinal electronic health records data. Oral splints, clear aligners, mandibular advancement devices: hidden sources of micro- and nanoplastic exposure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1