[同样的药物,重新启动后无反应:精神药物的快速反应]。

Q4 Medicine Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-01-01
W Pörtzgen, N M Batelaan, A van Bergen, C H Vinkers, A J L M van Balkom
{"title":"[同样的药物,重新启动后无反应:精神药物的快速反应]。","authors":"W Pörtzgen, N M Batelaan, A van Bergen, C H Vinkers, A J L M van Balkom","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This scoping review focuses on the occurrence of tachyphylaxis, defined as reduced responsiveness upon reinitiating a previously effective medication. This phenomenon is previously documented in antidepressants and mood stabilizers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the frequency, treatment strategies, and predictability of tachyphylaxis across all psychotropic medications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review adheres to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, employing a PubMed search to identify relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 articles were included: eleven on mood stabilizers (lithium carbonate), eight on antidepressants (SSRIs and TCAs), and three on antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone). No literature on benzodiazepines was found. The incidence varied (8.3-40.2% for antidepressants, 10.8-43.2% for mood stabilizers), with limited evidence for antipsychotics. Some articles discussed potential mechanisms of action, treatment strategies, and risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tachyphylaxis was predominantly reported in mood stabilizers and antidepressants. Indications of tachyphylaxis were noted in antipsychotics, except for clozapine. Clear conclusions were hindered by insufficient methodological research. The scarcity of literature emphasizes the need for further investigation into the prevalence, pathophysiology, and risk factors of tachyphylaxis. Until more clarity emerges, clinicians should consider the risk of tachyphylaxis when discontinuing and restarting mood stabilizers and antidepressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"66 9","pages":"537-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The same agent, no response upon restart: tachyphylaxis with psychotropic medications].\",\"authors\":\"W Pörtzgen, N M Batelaan, A van Bergen, C H Vinkers, A J L M van Balkom\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This scoping review focuses on the occurrence of tachyphylaxis, defined as reduced responsiveness upon reinitiating a previously effective medication. This phenomenon is previously documented in antidepressants and mood stabilizers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the frequency, treatment strategies, and predictability of tachyphylaxis across all psychotropic medications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review adheres to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, employing a PubMed search to identify relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 articles were included: eleven on mood stabilizers (lithium carbonate), eight on antidepressants (SSRIs and TCAs), and three on antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone). No literature on benzodiazepines was found. The incidence varied (8.3-40.2% for antidepressants, 10.8-43.2% for mood stabilizers), with limited evidence for antipsychotics. Some articles discussed potential mechanisms of action, treatment strategies, and risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tachyphylaxis was predominantly reported in mood stabilizers and antidepressants. Indications of tachyphylaxis were noted in antipsychotics, except for clozapine. Clear conclusions were hindered by insufficient methodological research. The scarcity of literature emphasizes the need for further investigation into the prevalence, pathophysiology, and risk factors of tachyphylaxis. Until more clarity emerges, clinicians should consider the risk of tachyphylaxis when discontinuing and restarting mood stabilizers and antidepressants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"66 9\",\"pages\":\"537-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本综述主要关注速发性反应的发生,速发性反应被定义为重新使用先前有效的药物后反应性降低。这种现象以前在抗抑郁药和情绪稳定剂中有记载。目的:探讨所有精神药物中快速反应的发生频率、治疗策略和可预测性。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,采用PubMed检索来识别相关文章。结果:共纳入22篇文章:11篇关于情绪稳定剂(碳酸锂),8篇关于抗抑郁药(SSRIs和TCAs), 3篇关于抗精神病药(阿立哌唑、氯氮平、奥氮平、帕利哌酮、喹硫平和利培酮)。没有发现有关苯二氮卓类药物的文献。发病率各不相同(抗抑郁药8.3-40.2%,情绪稳定剂10.8-43.2%),抗精神病药物的证据有限。一些文章讨论了潜在的作用机制、治疗策略和危险因素。结论:情绪稳定剂和抗抑郁药中以速反应为主。除氯氮平外,其他抗精神病药物均有快速反应的适应症。由于方法学研究不足,无法得出明确的结论。文献的缺乏强调了对快速反应的患病率、病理生理学和危险因素进行进一步调查的必要性。在进一步明确之前,临床医生在停用和重新使用情绪稳定剂和抗抑郁药时应考虑快速反应的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The same agent, no response upon restart: tachyphylaxis with psychotropic medications].

Background: This scoping review focuses on the occurrence of tachyphylaxis, defined as reduced responsiveness upon reinitiating a previously effective medication. This phenomenon is previously documented in antidepressants and mood stabilizers.

Aim: To explore the frequency, treatment strategies, and predictability of tachyphylaxis across all psychotropic medications.

Method: The review adheres to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, employing a PubMed search to identify relevant articles.

Results: A total of 22 articles were included: eleven on mood stabilizers (lithium carbonate), eight on antidepressants (SSRIs and TCAs), and three on antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone). No literature on benzodiazepines was found. The incidence varied (8.3-40.2% for antidepressants, 10.8-43.2% for mood stabilizers), with limited evidence for antipsychotics. Some articles discussed potential mechanisms of action, treatment strategies, and risk factors.

Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis was predominantly reported in mood stabilizers and antidepressants. Indications of tachyphylaxis were noted in antipsychotics, except for clozapine. Clear conclusions were hindered by insufficient methodological research. The scarcity of literature emphasizes the need for further investigation into the prevalence, pathophysiology, and risk factors of tachyphylaxis. Until more clarity emerges, clinicians should consider the risk of tachyphylaxis when discontinuing and restarting mood stabilizers and antidepressants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
[Compulsory care for a mental incompetent pregnant woman: a case-report]. [Erotomania as a symptom of pathological grief]. [The nurse practitioner as responsible clinician: opportunities and challenges]. [Underexposed consequences of assisted death on psychiatric grounds for mental health care]. [Verplichte zorg bij een wilsonbekwame zwangere: maatwerk met respect voor mensenrechten].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1