研究公共卫生认证与COVID-19结果之间的关系。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000002100
Mary V Davis, Nikki Rider, Ammar A Rashied, Shankar Bhat, Britt Lang
{"title":"研究公共卫生认证与COVID-19结果之间的关系。","authors":"Mary V Davis, Nikki Rider, Ammar A Rashied, Shankar Bhat, Britt Lang","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between local health department (LHD) accreditation and COVID-19 community outcomes, including rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We examined county level rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death by LHD accreditation status over the course of the COVID pandemic. Additional independent variables included time period, COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI), state public health governance structure, and state policy environment. We used hierarchal linear mixed modeling with random intercept for county level data to account for repeated observations and fixed effects for all other variables.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study examined all communities in the United States of America.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>LHDs and the communities they serve.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among accredited LHDs, the adult population was more likely to be fully vaccinated when compared to unaccredited LHDs ( P < .01). Additional variables in the model, which were also significant, included time period, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure. There were no significant differences in the hospitalization rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD compared to jurisdictions where the LHD is not accredited. Death rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD were statistically significantly lower than death rates in jurisdictions where the health department was not accredited ( P < .001). This relationship was significant with other key variables in the model, including time, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that there is an association between LHD accreditation and community health outcomes. Furthermore, we found that other factors, such as social determinants of health, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure impact community health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Association Between Public Health Accreditation and COVID-19 Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Mary V Davis, Nikki Rider, Ammar A Rashied, Shankar Bhat, Britt Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between local health department (LHD) accreditation and COVID-19 community outcomes, including rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We examined county level rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death by LHD accreditation status over the course of the COVID pandemic. Additional independent variables included time period, COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI), state public health governance structure, and state policy environment. We used hierarchal linear mixed modeling with random intercept for county level data to account for repeated observations and fixed effects for all other variables.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study examined all communities in the United States of America.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>LHDs and the communities they serve.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among accredited LHDs, the adult population was more likely to be fully vaccinated when compared to unaccredited LHDs ( P < .01). Additional variables in the model, which were also significant, included time period, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure. There were no significant differences in the hospitalization rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD compared to jurisdictions where the LHD is not accredited. Death rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD were statistically significantly lower than death rates in jurisdictions where the health department was not accredited ( P < .001). This relationship was significant with other key variables in the model, including time, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that there is an association between LHD accreditation and community health outcomes. Furthermore, we found that other factors, such as social determinants of health, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure impact community health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨地方卫生部门(LHD)认可与COVID-19社区结局(包括成人疫苗接种率、住院率和死亡率)之间的关系。设计:我们通过LHD认证状态检查了COVID大流行期间县级成人疫苗接种率、住院率和死亡率。其他自变量包括时间段、COVID-19社区脆弱性指数(CCVI)、州公共卫生治理结构和州政策环境。我们对县级数据使用分层线性混合模型与随机截距,以解释重复观测和所有其他变量的固定效应。环境:本研究调查了美利坚合众国的所有社区。参与者:lhd和他们所服务的社区。主要结局指标:成人疫苗接种率、住院率和COVID-19死亡率。结果:与未获得认证的LHD相比,在获得认证的LHD中,成年人口更有可能充分接种疫苗(P结论:本研究表明LHD认证与社区健康结果之间存在关联。此外,我们发现其他因素,如健康的社会决定因素、国家政策环境和国家公共卫生治理结构影响社区健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Association Between Public Health Accreditation and COVID-19 Outcomes.

Objective: To examine the association between local health department (LHD) accreditation and COVID-19 community outcomes, including rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death.

Design: We examined county level rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death by LHD accreditation status over the course of the COVID pandemic. Additional independent variables included time period, COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI), state public health governance structure, and state policy environment. We used hierarchal linear mixed modeling with random intercept for county level data to account for repeated observations and fixed effects for all other variables.

Setting: This study examined all communities in the United States of America.

Participants: LHDs and the communities they serve.

Main outcome measures: Rates of adult vaccination, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19.

Results: Among accredited LHDs, the adult population was more likely to be fully vaccinated when compared to unaccredited LHDs ( P < .01). Additional variables in the model, which were also significant, included time period, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure. There were no significant differences in the hospitalization rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD compared to jurisdictions where the LHD is not accredited. Death rates in jurisdictions with an accredited LHD were statistically significantly lower than death rates in jurisdictions where the health department was not accredited ( P < .001). This relationship was significant with other key variables in the model, including time, CCVI, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is an association between LHD accreditation and community health outcomes. Furthermore, we found that other factors, such as social determinants of health, state policy environment, and state public health governance structure impact community health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
期刊最新文献
Updated National and State-Specific Prevalence of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection, United States, 2018-2022. A Comparison of Los Angeles County Health Survey Outcomes After Transitioning From Telephone to a Primarily Web-Based, Self-Administration Data Collection Mode. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Infrastructure Grant: A Better Approach to Empowering More State and Local Decision Making and Strengthening the Public Health Workforce and Infrastructure. Communication Disparities and Trusted Sources of COVID-19 Information in Massachusetts School Districts. Experiences and Lessons Learned From Surging the Governmental Public Health Workforce During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1