{"title":"甲状腺癌临床试验中选择性RET抑制剂敏感性的基因组学综述。","authors":"Sara Gil-Bernabé, Lucía García-DeLaFuente, Alejandro García-Álvarez, Ginesa García-Rostán, Jaume Capdevila, Jorge Hernando","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.c.32127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>RET gene is a driver of thyroid cancer (TC) tumorigenesis. The incidence of TC has increased worldwide in the last few decades, both in medullary and follicular-derived subtypes. Several drugs, including multikinase and selective inhibitors, have been explored. Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are selective RET inhibitors that have shown clear clinical benefits for patients in the LIBRETTO and ARROW trials, respectively. Currently, their development and application in clinical practice are ongoing. However, its efficacy in different RET pathogenic variants has not yet been well established. Although selpercatinib and pralsetinib achieved a high ORR, no data are available regarding the differences in tumor responses of both TC groups according to RET pathogenic variants. Clinical trials and literature have analyzed the efficacy of selective RET inhibitors with a special interest in the most common variants. A review of LIBRETTO and ARROW trials was made regarding the change in tumor size depending on the pathogenic variants. M918T pathogenic variant resulted in a higher complete response rate. Patients who underwent fusion had the highest ORR (objective response rate). MKi-treated patients did not exhibit significant differences from untreated patients. Different RET pathogenic variants are not biomarkers of RETi response in TC. Selpercatinib showed a tendency to achieve a complete response. All patients with RET pathogenic variants should receive treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib at any moment of the therapeutic schedule owing to off-target inhibition and toxicity. Therefore, new targets for drug sensitivity and resistance should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":7445,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"e32127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomics Review of Selective RET Inhibitors Sensitivity in Thyroid Cancer Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Gil-Bernabé, Lucía García-DeLaFuente, Alejandro García-Álvarez, Ginesa García-Rostán, Jaume Capdevila, Jorge Hernando\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajmg.c.32127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>RET gene is a driver of thyroid cancer (TC) tumorigenesis. The incidence of TC has increased worldwide in the last few decades, both in medullary and follicular-derived subtypes. Several drugs, including multikinase and selective inhibitors, have been explored. Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are selective RET inhibitors that have shown clear clinical benefits for patients in the LIBRETTO and ARROW trials, respectively. Currently, their development and application in clinical practice are ongoing. However, its efficacy in different RET pathogenic variants has not yet been well established. Although selpercatinib and pralsetinib achieved a high ORR, no data are available regarding the differences in tumor responses of both TC groups according to RET pathogenic variants. Clinical trials and literature have analyzed the efficacy of selective RET inhibitors with a special interest in the most common variants. A review of LIBRETTO and ARROW trials was made regarding the change in tumor size depending on the pathogenic variants. M918T pathogenic variant resulted in a higher complete response rate. Patients who underwent fusion had the highest ORR (objective response rate). MKi-treated patients did not exhibit significant differences from untreated patients. Different RET pathogenic variants are not biomarkers of RETi response in TC. Selpercatinib showed a tendency to achieve a complete response. All patients with RET pathogenic variants should receive treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib at any moment of the therapeutic schedule owing to off-target inhibition and toxicity. Therefore, new targets for drug sensitivity and resistance should be explored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e32127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.32127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.32127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomics Review of Selective RET Inhibitors Sensitivity in Thyroid Cancer Clinical Trials.
RET gene is a driver of thyroid cancer (TC) tumorigenesis. The incidence of TC has increased worldwide in the last few decades, both in medullary and follicular-derived subtypes. Several drugs, including multikinase and selective inhibitors, have been explored. Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are selective RET inhibitors that have shown clear clinical benefits for patients in the LIBRETTO and ARROW trials, respectively. Currently, their development and application in clinical practice are ongoing. However, its efficacy in different RET pathogenic variants has not yet been well established. Although selpercatinib and pralsetinib achieved a high ORR, no data are available regarding the differences in tumor responses of both TC groups according to RET pathogenic variants. Clinical trials and literature have analyzed the efficacy of selective RET inhibitors with a special interest in the most common variants. A review of LIBRETTO and ARROW trials was made regarding the change in tumor size depending on the pathogenic variants. M918T pathogenic variant resulted in a higher complete response rate. Patients who underwent fusion had the highest ORR (objective response rate). MKi-treated patients did not exhibit significant differences from untreated patients. Different RET pathogenic variants are not biomarkers of RETi response in TC. Selpercatinib showed a tendency to achieve a complete response. All patients with RET pathogenic variants should receive treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib at any moment of the therapeutic schedule owing to off-target inhibition and toxicity. Therefore, new targets for drug sensitivity and resistance should be explored.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Medical Genetics, Part C of the American Journal of Medical Genetics (AJMG) , serves as both an educational resource and review forum, providing critical, in-depth retrospectives for students, practitioners, and associated professionals working in fields of human and medical genetics. Each issue is guest edited by a researcher in a featured area of genetics, offering a collection of thematic reviews from specialists around the world. Seminars in Medical Genetics publishes four times per year.