呼吸支持策略在新生儿运输在英国和爱尔兰。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05947-z
Allan Jenkinson, Theodore Dassios, Nandiran Ratnavel, Anne Greenough
{"title":"呼吸支持策略在新生儿运输在英国和爱尔兰。","authors":"Allan Jenkinson, Theodore Dassios, Nandiran Ratnavel, Anne Greenough","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05947-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infants requiring interhospital transfer for a higher level of care in the neonatal period are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Optimising respiratory management is an important priority. The aim of this survey was to investigate current respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport and identify opportunities for the optimisation of clinical care and future research. A survey of all 18 transport groups in Ireland and the UK was performed. A 10-item structured questionnaire was administered through consultant neonatologists or lead nurses from each transport group between May and June 2024. There was a 100% response rate. There was variation in the types of neonatal ventilator used, and they differed from those on NICUs. A variety of invasive strategies were used, but volume-targeted ventilation was the most common, although different ventilators can deliver different volumes despite apparently the same settings. Non-invasive strategies were used by all, with humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) being the most common. Continuous carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring was used by most teams (94%): endotracheal CO<sub>2</sub> assessments by 94% and transcutaneous monitoring by 70%. Only two teams employed closed loop automated oxygen control (CLAC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is heterogeneity in the ventilators and respiratory strategies used by transport groups. Future research opportunities should include the comparison of those strategies on short- and long-term outcomes, as well as whether continuous CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring and CLAC have important benefits.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Nearly one quarter of neonatal transfers in the UK and Ireland are in infants mechanically ventilated. • Optimising respiratory support strategies and reporting respiratory outcomes are research priorities in neonatal transport.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Volume targeted ventilation is the most common respiratory support strategy used in neonatal transport groups in the UK and Ireland, with a heterogeneity of ventilators in use in neonatal transport versus in NICUs. • There is a paucity of data reporting respiratory outcomes following neonatal transport including outcomes related to mode of ventilation, continuous carbon dioxide monitoring and closed loop automated oxygen control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport in the UK and Ireland.\",\"authors\":\"Allan Jenkinson, Theodore Dassios, Nandiran Ratnavel, Anne Greenough\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-024-05947-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infants requiring interhospital transfer for a higher level of care in the neonatal period are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Optimising respiratory management is an important priority. The aim of this survey was to investigate current respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport and identify opportunities for the optimisation of clinical care and future research. A survey of all 18 transport groups in Ireland and the UK was performed. A 10-item structured questionnaire was administered through consultant neonatologists or lead nurses from each transport group between May and June 2024. There was a 100% response rate. There was variation in the types of neonatal ventilator used, and they differed from those on NICUs. A variety of invasive strategies were used, but volume-targeted ventilation was the most common, although different ventilators can deliver different volumes despite apparently the same settings. Non-invasive strategies were used by all, with humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) being the most common. Continuous carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring was used by most teams (94%): endotracheal CO<sub>2</sub> assessments by 94% and transcutaneous monitoring by 70%. Only two teams employed closed loop automated oxygen control (CLAC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is heterogeneity in the ventilators and respiratory strategies used by transport groups. Future research opportunities should include the comparison of those strategies on short- and long-term outcomes, as well as whether continuous CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring and CLAC have important benefits.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Nearly one quarter of neonatal transfers in the UK and Ireland are in infants mechanically ventilated. • Optimising respiratory support strategies and reporting respiratory outcomes are research priorities in neonatal transport.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Volume targeted ventilation is the most common respiratory support strategy used in neonatal transport groups in the UK and Ireland, with a heterogeneity of ventilators in use in neonatal transport versus in NICUs. • There is a paucity of data reporting respiratory outcomes following neonatal transport including outcomes related to mode of ventilation, continuous carbon dioxide monitoring and closed loop automated oxygen control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 1\",\"pages\":\"115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05947-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05947-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新生儿期需要医院间转院接受更高水平护理的婴儿发生不良后果的风险增加。优化呼吸管理是一个重要的优先事项。本调查的目的是调查当前新生儿转运中的呼吸支持策略,并确定优化临床护理和未来研究的机会。对爱尔兰和英国的全部18家运输集团进行了调查。在2024年5月至6月期间,通过每个运输组的新生儿专科医生或首席护士进行10项结构化问卷调查。有100%的回复率。使用的新生儿呼吸机类型有所不同,与新生儿重症监护病房不同。使用了各种有创策略,但以容积为目标的通气是最常见的,尽管不同的呼吸机可以提供不同的容积,尽管显然相同的设置。所有患者均采用非侵入性策略,其中湿化高流量鼻插管(HHFNC)最为常见。大多数团队(94%)使用连续二氧化碳(CO2)监测:气管内二氧化碳评估占94%,经皮监测占70%。只有两支队伍采用了闭环自动氧气控制(CLAC)。结论:转运组呼吸机和呼吸策略存在异质性。未来的研究机会应该包括对这些策略的短期和长期结果的比较,以及持续的二氧化碳监测和CLAC是否有重要的好处。•在英国和爱尔兰,近四分之一的新生儿转移是机械通气的婴儿。•优化呼吸支持策略和报告呼吸结果是新生儿运输的研究重点。•在英国和爱尔兰的新生儿运输组中,容积定向通气是最常用的呼吸支持策略,在新生儿运输中使用的呼吸机与在新生儿重症监护病房中使用的呼吸机存在异质性。•缺乏报告新生儿转运后呼吸结果的数据,包括与通气模式、连续二氧化碳监测和闭环自动氧气控制相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport in the UK and Ireland.

Infants requiring interhospital transfer for a higher level of care in the neonatal period are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Optimising respiratory management is an important priority. The aim of this survey was to investigate current respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport and identify opportunities for the optimisation of clinical care and future research. A survey of all 18 transport groups in Ireland and the UK was performed. A 10-item structured questionnaire was administered through consultant neonatologists or lead nurses from each transport group between May and June 2024. There was a 100% response rate. There was variation in the types of neonatal ventilator used, and they differed from those on NICUs. A variety of invasive strategies were used, but volume-targeted ventilation was the most common, although different ventilators can deliver different volumes despite apparently the same settings. Non-invasive strategies were used by all, with humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) being the most common. Continuous carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring was used by most teams (94%): endotracheal CO2 assessments by 94% and transcutaneous monitoring by 70%. Only two teams employed closed loop automated oxygen control (CLAC).

Conclusion: There is heterogeneity in the ventilators and respiratory strategies used by transport groups. Future research opportunities should include the comparison of those strategies on short- and long-term outcomes, as well as whether continuous CO2 monitoring and CLAC have important benefits.

What is known: • Nearly one quarter of neonatal transfers in the UK and Ireland are in infants mechanically ventilated. • Optimising respiratory support strategies and reporting respiratory outcomes are research priorities in neonatal transport.

What is new: • Volume targeted ventilation is the most common respiratory support strategy used in neonatal transport groups in the UK and Ireland, with a heterogeneity of ventilators in use in neonatal transport versus in NICUs. • There is a paucity of data reporting respiratory outcomes following neonatal transport including outcomes related to mode of ventilation, continuous carbon dioxide monitoring and closed loop automated oxygen control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Access to child-appropriate medicines: an exploratory survey of the use of paediatric use marketing authorisation products in the UK. Under-five mortality and social determinants in africa: a systematic review. Assessment of delirium in Indonesian pediatric intensive care unit: a psychometric evaluation of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium. The timing and safety of topical timolol treatment for superficial infantile hemangioma: a retrospective cohort study. Development and maintenance of consensus recommendations on pediatric outpatient antibiotic therapy in Germany: a framework for rational use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1