Willem N Sloot, Elisa Bertotti, Manuela Onidi, Andrea Paoletti, Ilse De Salve, Patrizia Tavano, Enrico Vigna, Gundi Mueller
{"title":"新型抗ceacam5抗体Exatecan偶联物的非临床安全性评估预测间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者的低风险- ILD背后的推测机制","authors":"Willem N Sloot, Elisa Bertotti, Manuela Onidi, Andrea Paoletti, Ilse De Salve, Patrizia Tavano, Enrico Vigna, Gundi Mueller","doi":"10.1177/10915818241306039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic window of antibody drug-conjugates (ADC) remains challenging due to safety issues such as interstitial lung disease (ILD) observed with specific deruxtecan-based ADCs. To avoid ILD, we designed M9140 by conjugating the maleimide-containing hydrophilic β-glucuronide linker to exatecan and our anti-CEACAM5 (CarcinoEmbryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 5) specific antibody. Following repeated iv-infusion at 3 to 30 mg/kg of M9140 every 3 weeks, the pathological findings obtained in cynomolgus monkeys were confined to gastrointestinal and hematolymphoid tissues and resembled the toxicity of exatecan. At 24 mg/kg or higher, transient reductions in neutrophil and reticulocyte counts were observed with each dosing event along with reversible anemia throughout the study. The no observed adverse effect level was 24 mg/kg and the maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/kg. The difference in toxicity by this small dose increment was correlated with a 2.5-fold difference in plasma exatecan exposure indicating antigen-independent toxicity. As anticipated, no lung toxicity was found with M9140 in these studies that were similar in study design to those used to confirm ILD with trastuzumab-deruxtecan in monkeys. Since the non-human primate model is regarded as predictive for the ILD risk in humans, this result indicates a low risk for ILD when applying M9140 to patients. The current M9140 safety data are discussed with special focus on the absence or presence of ILD with other antibody camptothecin-conjugates, for which a hypothetical pathogenic mechanism is postulated here. The favorable nonclinical profile of M9140 warrants further investigation in patients with CEACAM5-overexpressing tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"10915818241306039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nonclinical Safety Assessment of a Novel Anti-CEACAM5 Antibody Exatecan Conjugate Predicts a Low Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) in Patients-The Putative Mechanism Behind ILD.\",\"authors\":\"Willem N Sloot, Elisa Bertotti, Manuela Onidi, Andrea Paoletti, Ilse De Salve, Patrizia Tavano, Enrico Vigna, Gundi Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10915818241306039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic window of antibody drug-conjugates (ADC) remains challenging due to safety issues such as interstitial lung disease (ILD) observed with specific deruxtecan-based ADCs. To avoid ILD, we designed M9140 by conjugating the maleimide-containing hydrophilic β-glucuronide linker to exatecan and our anti-CEACAM5 (CarcinoEmbryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 5) specific antibody. Following repeated iv-infusion at 3 to 30 mg/kg of M9140 every 3 weeks, the pathological findings obtained in cynomolgus monkeys were confined to gastrointestinal and hematolymphoid tissues and resembled the toxicity of exatecan. At 24 mg/kg or higher, transient reductions in neutrophil and reticulocyte counts were observed with each dosing event along with reversible anemia throughout the study. The no observed adverse effect level was 24 mg/kg and the maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/kg. The difference in toxicity by this small dose increment was correlated with a 2.5-fold difference in plasma exatecan exposure indicating antigen-independent toxicity. As anticipated, no lung toxicity was found with M9140 in these studies that were similar in study design to those used to confirm ILD with trastuzumab-deruxtecan in monkeys. Since the non-human primate model is regarded as predictive for the ILD risk in humans, this result indicates a low risk for ILD when applying M9140 to patients. The current M9140 safety data are discussed with special focus on the absence or presence of ILD with other antibody camptothecin-conjugates, for which a hypothetical pathogenic mechanism is postulated here. The favorable nonclinical profile of M9140 warrants further investigation in patients with CEACAM5-overexpressing tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10915818241306039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818241306039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818241306039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Nonclinical Safety Assessment of a Novel Anti-CEACAM5 Antibody Exatecan Conjugate Predicts a Low Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) in Patients-The Putative Mechanism Behind ILD.
The therapeutic window of antibody drug-conjugates (ADC) remains challenging due to safety issues such as interstitial lung disease (ILD) observed with specific deruxtecan-based ADCs. To avoid ILD, we designed M9140 by conjugating the maleimide-containing hydrophilic β-glucuronide linker to exatecan and our anti-CEACAM5 (CarcinoEmbryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 5) specific antibody. Following repeated iv-infusion at 3 to 30 mg/kg of M9140 every 3 weeks, the pathological findings obtained in cynomolgus monkeys were confined to gastrointestinal and hematolymphoid tissues and resembled the toxicity of exatecan. At 24 mg/kg or higher, transient reductions in neutrophil and reticulocyte counts were observed with each dosing event along with reversible anemia throughout the study. The no observed adverse effect level was 24 mg/kg and the maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/kg. The difference in toxicity by this small dose increment was correlated with a 2.5-fold difference in plasma exatecan exposure indicating antigen-independent toxicity. As anticipated, no lung toxicity was found with M9140 in these studies that were similar in study design to those used to confirm ILD with trastuzumab-deruxtecan in monkeys. Since the non-human primate model is regarded as predictive for the ILD risk in humans, this result indicates a low risk for ILD when applying M9140 to patients. The current M9140 safety data are discussed with special focus on the absence or presence of ILD with other antibody camptothecin-conjugates, for which a hypothetical pathogenic mechanism is postulated here. The favorable nonclinical profile of M9140 warrants further investigation in patients with CEACAM5-overexpressing tumors.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.