普通急诊科重症精神疾病患者:临床特点、护理质量与挑战

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.014
Sharon Taub , Noa Menkes-Caspi , Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok , Shiri Kamhi-Nesher , Amir Krivoy
{"title":"普通急诊科重症精神疾病患者:临床特点、护理质量与挑战","authors":"Sharon Taub ,&nbsp;Noa Menkes-Caspi ,&nbsp;Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok ,&nbsp;Shiri Kamhi-Nesher ,&nbsp;Amir Krivoy","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Morbidity and mortality rates are notably higher among individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI). People with SMI often have lower access to healthcare services, and the medical care they receive is known to be suboptimal. Consequently, treatment in an acute care setting rather than a community setting is more common. We aim to explore medical care in the emergency department (ED) for people with SMI compared to a control population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this matched cohort study, data on all adult Clalit Health Services (CHS) members who were referred to the general ED during the years 2018–2021 were extracted. Patients with SMI (ICD-10 codes for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder) were matched with a control group of ED patients without SMI in a 1:3 ratio. The two groups were compared regarding ED admission reasons, management, and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total sample (<em>n</em> = 92,848) included ED patients with SMI (<em>n</em> = 23,212) and without (<em>n</em> = 69,636). The most common ED admission reasons in both groups were pain, traumatic injury, and cardiac symptoms. Patients in the SMI group had higher rates of diagnosed diabetes mellitus and obstructive pulmonary disease.</div><div>ED assessment, measured by resource allocation, was less comprehensive for patients with SMI who presented with subjective complaints such as pain and weakness, while it was comparable between patients with and without SMI for other main presenting complaints. Workup for patients with SMI lasted longer and necessitated hospitalization at higher rates for most admission reasons. Mortality during the study period was almost twice as high among the SMI group (5 % vs. 2.3 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings indicate higher rates of morbidity and treatment complexity among patients with SMI. As expected, the mortality rate was higher in this group. An alarming gap in resource allocation for ED assessment was observed when patients presented with subjective complaints. Enhanced awareness and integrated resources in primary care are required to improve the management and physical healthcare of patients with SMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients with severe mental illness in the general emergency department: Clinical characteristics, quality of care and challenges\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Taub ,&nbsp;Noa Menkes-Caspi ,&nbsp;Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok ,&nbsp;Shiri Kamhi-Nesher ,&nbsp;Amir Krivoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Morbidity and mortality rates are notably higher among individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI). People with SMI often have lower access to healthcare services, and the medical care they receive is known to be suboptimal. Consequently, treatment in an acute care setting rather than a community setting is more common. We aim to explore medical care in the emergency department (ED) for people with SMI compared to a control population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this matched cohort study, data on all adult Clalit Health Services (CHS) members who were referred to the general ED during the years 2018–2021 were extracted. Patients with SMI (ICD-10 codes for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder) were matched with a control group of ED patients without SMI in a 1:3 ratio. The two groups were compared regarding ED admission reasons, management, and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total sample (<em>n</em> = 92,848) included ED patients with SMI (<em>n</em> = 23,212) and without (<em>n</em> = 69,636). The most common ED admission reasons in both groups were pain, traumatic injury, and cardiac symptoms. Patients in the SMI group had higher rates of diagnosed diabetes mellitus and obstructive pulmonary disease.</div><div>ED assessment, measured by resource allocation, was less comprehensive for patients with SMI who presented with subjective complaints such as pain and weakness, while it was comparable between patients with and without SMI for other main presenting complaints. Workup for patients with SMI lasted longer and necessitated hospitalization at higher rates for most admission reasons. Mortality during the study period was almost twice as high among the SMI group (5 % vs. 2.3 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings indicate higher rates of morbidity and treatment complexity among patients with SMI. As expected, the mortality rate was higher in this group. An alarming gap in resource allocation for ED assessment was observed when patients presented with subjective complaints. Enhanced awareness and integrated resources in primary care are required to improve the management and physical healthcare of patients with SMI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324002378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324002378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的发病率和死亡率明显较高。重度精神障碍患者通常很少获得医疗保健服务,而且他们得到的医疗保健是不理想的。因此,在急症护理机构而不是社区机构进行治疗更为常见。我们的目的是探索医疗护理在急诊科(ED)的人与重度精神障碍的对照人群。方法:在这项匹配的队列研究中,提取了2018-2021年间转介到普通急诊科的所有成年Clalit Health Services (CHS)成员的数据。重度精神障碍患者(精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍和双相情感障碍的ICD-10编码)与对照组无重度精神障碍患者按1:3的比例配对。比较两组患者入院的原因、治疗和结果。结果:总样本(n = 92,848)包括伴有SMI的ED患者(n = 23,212)和不伴有SMI的ED患者(n = 69,636)。两组中最常见的急诊科入院原因是疼痛、创伤性损伤和心脏症状。重度精神分裂症组的患者诊断为糖尿病和阻塞性肺病的比例更高。ED评估,通过资源分配来衡量,对于表现为主观主诉(如疼痛和虚弱)的重度精神障碍患者来说,ED评估不太全面,而对于其他主要主诉,重度精神障碍患者和非重度精神障碍患者之间的ED评估具有可比性。重度精神障碍患者的随访时间更长,住院率更高。研究期间,重度精神障碍组的死亡率几乎是前者的两倍(5% vs. 2.3%)。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,重度精神障碍患者的发病率和治疗复杂性更高。不出所料,这一组的死亡率更高。当患者出现主观抱怨时,ED评估的资源分配存在惊人的差距。需要在初级保健方面提高认识并整合资源,以改善重度精神障碍患者的管理和身体保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients with severe mental illness in the general emergency department: Clinical characteristics, quality of care and challenges

Background

Morbidity and mortality rates are notably higher among individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI). People with SMI often have lower access to healthcare services, and the medical care they receive is known to be suboptimal. Consequently, treatment in an acute care setting rather than a community setting is more common. We aim to explore medical care in the emergency department (ED) for people with SMI compared to a control population.

Methods

In this matched cohort study, data on all adult Clalit Health Services (CHS) members who were referred to the general ED during the years 2018–2021 were extracted. Patients with SMI (ICD-10 codes for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder) were matched with a control group of ED patients without SMI in a 1:3 ratio. The two groups were compared regarding ED admission reasons, management, and outcomes.

Results

The total sample (n = 92,848) included ED patients with SMI (n = 23,212) and without (n = 69,636). The most common ED admission reasons in both groups were pain, traumatic injury, and cardiac symptoms. Patients in the SMI group had higher rates of diagnosed diabetes mellitus and obstructive pulmonary disease.
ED assessment, measured by resource allocation, was less comprehensive for patients with SMI who presented with subjective complaints such as pain and weakness, while it was comparable between patients with and without SMI for other main presenting complaints. Workup for patients with SMI lasted longer and necessitated hospitalization at higher rates for most admission reasons. Mortality during the study period was almost twice as high among the SMI group (5 % vs. 2.3 %, p < 0.001).

Discussion

Our findings indicate higher rates of morbidity and treatment complexity among patients with SMI. As expected, the mortality rate was higher in this group. An alarming gap in resource allocation for ED assessment was observed when patients presented with subjective complaints. Enhanced awareness and integrated resources in primary care are required to improve the management and physical healthcare of patients with SMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sex-based cardiovascular risk in depressive symptoms A randomized controlled trial of beta-blockers effects on cardiac anxiety Risk of falls associated with non-GABAergic hypnotics and benzodiazepines in hospitalized patients The longitudinal association of optimism with quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary heart disease; The THORESCI study Transforming primary care with transdiagnostic approaches: The future of mental health treatment through technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1