{"title":"肺栓塞的管理:单中心经验。","authors":"R Holt Hammons, Sibu P Saha","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death. The objective of this study was to examine the current management of pulmonary embolism at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of 805 encounters among 775 patients presenting with acute PE from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019. We used American Heart Association guidelines for PE risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 409 patients were given the low-risk designation, 377 of these patients (92%) were anticoagulated with heparin or enoxaparin, and 32 patients (8%) were given a direct oral anticoagulant alone. There were two in-hospital mortalities (0.5%) in the low-risk group; 322 patients were in the true intermediate-risk category (ie, did not progress to high risk), and 320 patients received anticoagulation with heparin or enoxaparin (99.4%). Seventy-three patients (22%) received catheter-directed thrombolysis. There were eight in-hospital mortalities (2.5%) among the intermediate-risk group; eight intermediate-risk patients progressed to high-risk during their hospital stay, resulting in 6 in-hospital mortalities (75%) in this group. There were 66 patients designated as high-risk upon presentation. Sixty patients (91%) received heparin for anticoagulation and 47 patients (71%) required advanced therapies. Fourteen high-risk patients (21%) had bleeding complications, and there were 26 (39%) in-hospital mortalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of PE has evolved, and proper risk stratification is key. Largely speaking, low- and intermediate-risk patients can be treated with anticoagulation, whereas patients with severe right ventricular strain and hemodynamic instability may require more advanced therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Pulmonary Embolism: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"R Holt Hammons, Sibu P Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death. The objective of this study was to examine the current management of pulmonary embolism at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of 805 encounters among 775 patients presenting with acute PE from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019. We used American Heart Association guidelines for PE risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 409 patients were given the low-risk designation, 377 of these patients (92%) were anticoagulated with heparin or enoxaparin, and 32 patients (8%) were given a direct oral anticoagulant alone. There were two in-hospital mortalities (0.5%) in the low-risk group; 322 patients were in the true intermediate-risk category (ie, did not progress to high risk), and 320 patients received anticoagulation with heparin or enoxaparin (99.4%). Seventy-three patients (22%) received catheter-directed thrombolysis. There were eight in-hospital mortalities (2.5%) among the intermediate-risk group; eight intermediate-risk patients progressed to high-risk during their hospital stay, resulting in 6 in-hospital mortalities (75%) in this group. There were 66 patients designated as high-risk upon presentation. Sixty patients (91%) received heparin for anticoagulation and 47 patients (71%) required advanced therapies. Fourteen high-risk patients (21%) had bleeding complications, and there were 26 (39%) in-hospital mortalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of PE has evolved, and proper risk stratification is key. Largely speaking, low- and intermediate-risk patients can be treated with anticoagulation, whereas patients with severe right ventricular strain and hemodynamic instability may require more advanced therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"14-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001778\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of Pulmonary Embolism: A Single-Center Experience.
Objective: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death. The objective of this study was to examine the current management of pulmonary embolism at a single academic institution.
Methods: With institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of 805 encounters among 775 patients presenting with acute PE from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019. We used American Heart Association guidelines for PE risk stratification.
Results: In total, 409 patients were given the low-risk designation, 377 of these patients (92%) were anticoagulated with heparin or enoxaparin, and 32 patients (8%) were given a direct oral anticoagulant alone. There were two in-hospital mortalities (0.5%) in the low-risk group; 322 patients were in the true intermediate-risk category (ie, did not progress to high risk), and 320 patients received anticoagulation with heparin or enoxaparin (99.4%). Seventy-three patients (22%) received catheter-directed thrombolysis. There were eight in-hospital mortalities (2.5%) among the intermediate-risk group; eight intermediate-risk patients progressed to high-risk during their hospital stay, resulting in 6 in-hospital mortalities (75%) in this group. There were 66 patients designated as high-risk upon presentation. Sixty patients (91%) received heparin for anticoagulation and 47 patients (71%) required advanced therapies. Fourteen high-risk patients (21%) had bleeding complications, and there were 26 (39%) in-hospital mortalities.
Conclusions: The management of PE has evolved, and proper risk stratification is key. Largely speaking, low- and intermediate-risk patients can be treated with anticoagulation, whereas patients with severe right ventricular strain and hemodynamic instability may require more advanced therapies.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.