系统综述:肠易激综合征综合治疗模式。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14989
Molly M Warner, Olivia Marie Soliman, Megan Crichton, Skye Marshall, Heidi M Staudacher, Jaimon T Kelly
{"title":"系统综述:肠易激综合征综合治疗模式。","authors":"Molly M Warner, Olivia Marie Soliman, Megan Crichton, Skye Marshall, Heidi M Staudacher, Jaimon T Kelly","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary integrated models of care show promise for improving symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe and evaluate the characteristics of integrated models of care for IBS and identify how digital health is being used in these models of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched to March 2024 for studies that included adults with IBS who participated in multidisciplinary integrated models of care that delivered non-pharmacological therapies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to appraise study quality and extract model of care characteristics, which were mapped against the Project INTEGRATE framework to establish topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 2 quasi-experimental, 8 cohort studies) reported 14 integrated models of care including 2165 patients of which 918 were IBS patients. Integrated models of care led to improved IBS symptoms (n = 11/13 models of care) and QoL (n = 6/9 models of care). Studies showed moderate compliance with the TIDieR checklist. Five topics were established: clinicians involved, therapies provided, location and mode of delivery, coordinating clinical partnerships, and sharing visions and values of integrated care. Most commonly, a gastroenterologist coordinated care with a psychologist, dietitian, and/or nurse in tertiary care. Psychological, dietary, and physical therapies were provided by n = 11, n = 8, and n = 3 integrated models of care, respectively. Six models of care provided joint consultations or group sessions. Four models of care used digital health such as telephone coaching or online modules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrated models of care for IBS exhibited diverse characteristics including the clinicians involved, the therapies provided and the mode of delivery of each therapy. There is a need to evaluate the use of digital health and the delivery of integrated models of care in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review: Integrated Models of Care for Managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Molly M Warner, Olivia Marie Soliman, Megan Crichton, Skye Marshall, Heidi M Staudacher, Jaimon T Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary integrated models of care show promise for improving symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe and evaluate the characteristics of integrated models of care for IBS and identify how digital health is being used in these models of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched to March 2024 for studies that included adults with IBS who participated in multidisciplinary integrated models of care that delivered non-pharmacological therapies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to appraise study quality and extract model of care characteristics, which were mapped against the Project INTEGRATE framework to establish topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 2 quasi-experimental, 8 cohort studies) reported 14 integrated models of care including 2165 patients of which 918 were IBS patients. Integrated models of care led to improved IBS symptoms (n = 11/13 models of care) and QoL (n = 6/9 models of care). Studies showed moderate compliance with the TIDieR checklist. Five topics were established: clinicians involved, therapies provided, location and mode of delivery, coordinating clinical partnerships, and sharing visions and values of integrated care. Most commonly, a gastroenterologist coordinated care with a psychologist, dietitian, and/or nurse in tertiary care. Psychological, dietary, and physical therapies were provided by n = 11, n = 8, and n = 3 integrated models of care, respectively. Six models of care provided joint consultations or group sessions. Four models of care used digital health such as telephone coaching or online modules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrated models of care for IBS exhibited diverse characteristics including the clinicians involved, the therapies provided and the mode of delivery of each therapy. There is a need to evaluate the use of digital health and the delivery of integrated models of care in primary care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多学科综合护理模式有望改善成人肠易激综合征(IBS)的症状和生活质量(QoL)。目的:描述和评估肠易激综合征综合护理模式的特征,并确定数字健康如何在这些护理模式中使用。方法:从四个数据库中检索到2024年3月的研究,其中包括参加多学科综合护理模式的成人IBS患者,提供非药物治疗。使用干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)检查表评估研究质量,提取护理特征模型,并将其映射到Project integration框架中以建立主题。结果:16项研究(6项随机对照试验,2项准实验研究,8项队列研究)报道了14种综合护理模式,包括2165例患者,其中918例为肠易激综合征患者。综合护理模式改善了IBS症状(n = 11/13种护理模式)和生活质量(n = 6/9种护理模式)。研究显示对TIDieR检查表的依从性中等。建立了五个主题:临床医生参与、提供治疗、地点和交付模式、协调临床伙伴关系、分享综合护理的愿景和价值观。最常见的是,胃肠病学家与心理学家、营养师和/或三级护理护士协调护理。心理、饮食和物理治疗分别由n = 11、n = 8和n = 3个综合护理模式提供。六种护理模式提供联合咨询或小组会议。四种护理模式使用了数字健康,如电话指导或在线模块。结论:肠易激综合征的综合治疗模式表现出多种特征,包括参与的临床医生、提供的治疗方法和每种治疗的交付方式。有必要评估在初级保健环境中使用数字保健和提供综合保健模式的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review: Integrated Models of Care for Managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Background: Multidisciplinary integrated models of care show promise for improving symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Aims: To describe and evaluate the characteristics of integrated models of care for IBS and identify how digital health is being used in these models of care.

Methods: Four databases were searched to March 2024 for studies that included adults with IBS who participated in multidisciplinary integrated models of care that delivered non-pharmacological therapies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to appraise study quality and extract model of care characteristics, which were mapped against the Project INTEGRATE framework to establish topics.

Results: Sixteen studies (6 randomized controlled trials, 2 quasi-experimental, 8 cohort studies) reported 14 integrated models of care including 2165 patients of which 918 were IBS patients. Integrated models of care led to improved IBS symptoms (n = 11/13 models of care) and QoL (n = 6/9 models of care). Studies showed moderate compliance with the TIDieR checklist. Five topics were established: clinicians involved, therapies provided, location and mode of delivery, coordinating clinical partnerships, and sharing visions and values of integrated care. Most commonly, a gastroenterologist coordinated care with a psychologist, dietitian, and/or nurse in tertiary care. Psychological, dietary, and physical therapies were provided by n = 11, n = 8, and n = 3 integrated models of care, respectively. Six models of care provided joint consultations or group sessions. Four models of care used digital health such as telephone coaching or online modules.

Conclusions: Integrated models of care for IBS exhibited diverse characteristics including the clinicians involved, the therapies provided and the mode of delivery of each therapy. There is a need to evaluate the use of digital health and the delivery of integrated models of care in primary care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
期刊最新文献
Repetitive antegrade contractions on high-resolution manometry: A physiologic pattern related to sustained esophageal distention in Abelchia. Splenectomy prevents brain orexin, ghrelin, or oxytocin but not GLP-1-induced improvement of intestinal barrier function in rats. Role of prokinetics in ineffective esophageal motility: A call for broader consideration and future innovations. Authors' Reply to Letter-Role of Prokinetics in Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Call for Broader Consideration and Future Innovations. Dumping syndrome: Update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1