非侵入性迷走神经刺激与心率变异性生物反馈干预治疗慢性疼痛的有效性:系统综述。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0037
Katie Pellow, Jackie Harrison, Paul Tucker, Brent Harper
{"title":"非侵入性迷走神经刺激与心率变异性生物反馈干预治疗慢性疼痛的有效性:系统综述。","authors":"Katie Pellow, Jackie Harrison, Paul Tucker, Brent Harper","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autonomic regulation has been identified as a potential regulator of pain via vagal nerve mediation, assessed through heart rate variability (HRV). Non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) and heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) have been proposed to modulate pain. A limited number of studies compare nVNS and HRVB in persons with chronic pain conditions. This systematic review compared interventions of nVNS and HRVB in adults with long-standing pain conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library were used to retrieve the randomized controlled trials for this review between the years 2010 and 2023. Search terms included chronic pain, fibromyalgia, headache, migraine, vagus nerve stimulation, biofeedback, HRV, pain assessment, pain, and transcutaneous.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten full-text articles of 1,474 identified were selected for full qualitative synthesis, with a combined population of 813 subjects. There were <i>n</i> = 763 subjects in studies of nVNS and <i>n</i> = 50 subjects for HRVB. Six of the nine nVNS studies looked at headache disorders and migraines (<i>n</i> = 603), with two investigating effects on fibromyalgia symptoms (<i>n</i> = 138) and one the effects on chronic low back pain (<i>n</i> = 22). Of the nVNS studies, three demonstrated significant results in episode frequency, six in pain intensity (PI) reduction, and three in reduced medication use. The HRVB study showed statistically significant findings for reduced PI, depression scores, and increased HRV coherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests that nVNS is beneficial in reducing headache frequency and is well-tolerated, indicating it might be an alternative intervention to medication. HRVB interventions are beneficial in reducing pain, depression scores, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and in increasing HRV coherence ratio. HRVB and nVNS appear to show clinical benefits for chronic pain conditions; however, insufficient literature exists to support either approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation vs heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for chronic pain conditions: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Katie Pellow, Jackie Harrison, Paul Tucker, Brent Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autonomic regulation has been identified as a potential regulator of pain via vagal nerve mediation, assessed through heart rate variability (HRV). Non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) and heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) have been proposed to modulate pain. A limited number of studies compare nVNS and HRVB in persons with chronic pain conditions. This systematic review compared interventions of nVNS and HRVB in adults with long-standing pain conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library were used to retrieve the randomized controlled trials for this review between the years 2010 and 2023. Search terms included chronic pain, fibromyalgia, headache, migraine, vagus nerve stimulation, biofeedback, HRV, pain assessment, pain, and transcutaneous.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten full-text articles of 1,474 identified were selected for full qualitative synthesis, with a combined population of 813 subjects. There were <i>n</i> = 763 subjects in studies of nVNS and <i>n</i> = 50 subjects for HRVB. Six of the nine nVNS studies looked at headache disorders and migraines (<i>n</i> = 603), with two investigating effects on fibromyalgia symptoms (<i>n</i> = 138) and one the effects on chronic low back pain (<i>n</i> = 22). Of the nVNS studies, three demonstrated significant results in episode frequency, six in pain intensity (PI) reduction, and three in reduced medication use. The HRVB study showed statistically significant findings for reduced PI, depression scores, and increased HRV coherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests that nVNS is beneficial in reducing headache frequency and is well-tolerated, indicating it might be an alternative intervention to medication. HRVB interventions are beneficial in reducing pain, depression scores, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and in increasing HRV coherence ratio. HRVB and nVNS appear to show clinical benefits for chronic pain conditions; however, insufficient literature exists to support either approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过心率变异性(HRV)评估,自主神经调节已被确定为通过迷走神经介导的疼痛的潜在调节因子。无创迷走神经刺激(nVNS)和心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)被认为可以调节疼痛。有限数量的研究比较了nVNS和HRVB在慢性疼痛患者中的应用。本系统综述比较了nVNS和HRVB对成人长期疼痛状况的干预。方法:使用PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane图书馆检索本综述2010 - 2023年的随机对照试验。搜索词包括慢性疼痛、纤维肌痛、头痛、偏头痛、迷走神经刺激、生物反馈、HRV、疼痛评估、疼痛和经皮疼痛。结果:从鉴定的1474篇全文文章中选择10篇进行全面定性合成,总共813个受试者。nVNS研究n = 763例,HRVB研究n = 50例。9项nVNS研究中有6项研究针对头痛疾病和偏头痛(n = 603),其中2项研究针对纤维肌痛症状(n = 138), 1项研究针对慢性腰痛(n = 22)。在nVNS研究中,有3项在发作频率方面显示出显著的结果,6项在疼痛强度(PI)降低方面,3项在减少药物使用方面。HRVB研究显示具有统计学意义的PI降低、抑郁评分和HRV一致性增加的结果。结论:中等到高质量的证据表明,nVNS有利于减少头痛频率,并且耐受性良好,表明它可能是药物的替代干预措施。HRVB干预在减轻疼痛、抑郁评分、使用非甾体抗炎药物和增加HRV相干比方面是有益的。HRVB和nVNS似乎对慢性疼痛有临床益处;然而,没有足够的文献支持这两种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation vs heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for chronic pain conditions: A systematic review.

Objectives: Autonomic regulation has been identified as a potential regulator of pain via vagal nerve mediation, assessed through heart rate variability (HRV). Non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) and heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) have been proposed to modulate pain. A limited number of studies compare nVNS and HRVB in persons with chronic pain conditions. This systematic review compared interventions of nVNS and HRVB in adults with long-standing pain conditions.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library were used to retrieve the randomized controlled trials for this review between the years 2010 and 2023. Search terms included chronic pain, fibromyalgia, headache, migraine, vagus nerve stimulation, biofeedback, HRV, pain assessment, pain, and transcutaneous.

Results: Ten full-text articles of 1,474 identified were selected for full qualitative synthesis, with a combined population of 813 subjects. There were n = 763 subjects in studies of nVNS and n = 50 subjects for HRVB. Six of the nine nVNS studies looked at headache disorders and migraines (n = 603), with two investigating effects on fibromyalgia symptoms (n = 138) and one the effects on chronic low back pain (n = 22). Of the nVNS studies, three demonstrated significant results in episode frequency, six in pain intensity (PI) reduction, and three in reduced medication use. The HRVB study showed statistically significant findings for reduced PI, depression scores, and increased HRV coherence.

Conclusion: Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests that nVNS is beneficial in reducing headache frequency and is well-tolerated, indicating it might be an alternative intervention to medication. HRVB interventions are beneficial in reducing pain, depression scores, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and in increasing HRV coherence ratio. HRVB and nVNS appear to show clinical benefits for chronic pain conditions; however, insufficient literature exists to support either approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Stellate ganglion block in disparate treatment-resistant mental health disorders: A case series. A scoping review of the effectiveness of underwater treadmill exercise in clinical trials of chronic pain. Corrigendum to "Patient characteristics in relation to opioid exposure in a chronic non-cancer pain population". Association between clinical laboratory indicators and WOMAC scores in Qatar Biobank participants: The impact of testosterone and fibrinogen on pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Effectiveness of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation vs heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for chronic pain conditions: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1