左心室疾病是源性栓塞性卒中患者不良结局和卒中复发的危险因素。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1177/23969873241311331
Angelo Cascio Rizzo, Ghil Schwarz, Andrea Bonelli, Andrea Magi, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Antonella Moreo, Maria Sessa
{"title":"左心室疾病是源性栓塞性卒中患者不良结局和卒中复发的危险因素。","authors":"Angelo Cascio Rizzo, Ghil Schwarz, Andrea Bonelli, Andrea Magi, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Antonella Moreo, Maria Sessa","doi":"10.1177/23969873241311331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < 30%) is a known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of cardioembolism. However, less severe forms of LV disease (LVD), such as mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction and LV wall motion abnormalities (LVWMAs), are considered potential minor cardiac sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), but their role is underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LVD in ESUS and its association with adverse vascular events and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study including consecutive ESUS patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2024. LVD was defined as either global systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction 30%-49%) or regional LVWMAs, unrelated to acute or recent (within 4 weeks) myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the association of LVD with a primary composite outcome (including ischemic stroke recurrence, acute coronary events, and all-cause mortality), and its components separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 556 ESUS patients (median age 71 years [IQR 60-80], 44.6% female), 95 (17.1%) had LVD, including 51 (53.7%) with reduced LVEF (30%-49%), and 81 (85.3%) presenting LVWMAs. During follow-up (median 30 months), LVD(+) patients had significantly higher rates of the composite outcome (41.0% vs 21.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ischemic stroke recurrence (13.7% vs 5.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), acute coronary events (7.4% vs 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), and all-cause mortality (28.4% vs 15.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), compared to LVD(-) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LVD independently increased the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and the composite outcome (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, <i>p</i> = 0.002), but not acute coronary events (aHR 1.65; 95%CI 0.54-5.01, <i>p</i> = 0.374), or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.62; 95%CI 0.98-2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVD is significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and adverse outcomes in ESUS patients. These findings highlight the clinical importance of identifying and optimizing LVD management among ESUS to improve long-term outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873241311331"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular disease as a risk factor for adverse outcomes and stroke recurrence in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.\",\"authors\":\"Angelo Cascio Rizzo, Ghil Schwarz, Andrea Bonelli, Andrea Magi, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Antonella Moreo, Maria Sessa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969873241311331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < 30%) is a known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of cardioembolism. However, less severe forms of LV disease (LVD), such as mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction and LV wall motion abnormalities (LVWMAs), are considered potential minor cardiac sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), but their role is underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LVD in ESUS and its association with adverse vascular events and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study including consecutive ESUS patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2024. LVD was defined as either global systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction 30%-49%) or regional LVWMAs, unrelated to acute or recent (within 4 weeks) myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the association of LVD with a primary composite outcome (including ischemic stroke recurrence, acute coronary events, and all-cause mortality), and its components separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 556 ESUS patients (median age 71 years [IQR 60-80], 44.6% female), 95 (17.1%) had LVD, including 51 (53.7%) with reduced LVEF (30%-49%), and 81 (85.3%) presenting LVWMAs. During follow-up (median 30 months), LVD(+) patients had significantly higher rates of the composite outcome (41.0% vs 21.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ischemic stroke recurrence (13.7% vs 5.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), acute coronary events (7.4% vs 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), and all-cause mortality (28.4% vs 15.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), compared to LVD(-) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LVD independently increased the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and the composite outcome (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, <i>p</i> = 0.002), but not acute coronary events (aHR 1.65; 95%CI 0.54-5.01, <i>p</i> = 0.374), or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.62; 95%CI 0.98-2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVD is significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and adverse outcomes in ESUS patients. These findings highlight the clinical importance of identifying and optimizing LVD management among ESUS to improve long-term outcomes in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23969873241311331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241311331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241311331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度左室(LV)收缩功能障碍(射血分数[EF])方法:回顾性、单中心研究,纳入2016年1月至2024年5月连续入院的ESUS患者。LVD定义为与急性或近期(4周内)心肌梗死无关的整体收缩功能障碍(左室射血分数30%-49%)或局部左室wma。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析分别评估了LVD与主要复合结局(包括缺血性卒中复发、急性冠状动脉事件和全因死亡率)及其组成部分的相关性。结果:556例ESUS患者(中位年龄71岁[IQR 60-80],女性44.6%)中,95例(17.1%)存在LVD,其中51例(53.7%)LVEF降低(30%-49%),81例(85.3%)存在LVWMAs。在随访期间(中位30个月),与LVD(-)患者相比,LVD(+)患者的复合结局(41.0% vs 21.3%, p p = 0.007)、急性冠状动脉事件(7.4% vs 2.4%, p = 0.012)和全因死亡率(28.4% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002)的发生率显著高于LVD(-)患者。多因素Cox回归分析显示,LVD单独增加缺血性卒中复发的风险(调整HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, p = 0.032)和综合结局(aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, p = 0.002),但不增加急性冠状动脉事件(aHR 1.65;95%CI 0.54-5.01, p = 0.374)或全因死亡率(aHR 1.62;95%CI 0.98-2.70, p = 0.062)。结论:在ESUS患者中,LVD与缺血性卒中复发风险增加和不良结局显著相关。这些发现强调了在ESUS中识别和优化LVD管理以改善该人群长期预后的临床重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left ventricular disease as a risk factor for adverse outcomes and stroke recurrence in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Background: Severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < 30%) is a known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of cardioembolism. However, less severe forms of LV disease (LVD), such as mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction and LV wall motion abnormalities (LVWMAs), are considered potential minor cardiac sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), but their role is underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LVD in ESUS and its association with adverse vascular events and mortality.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center study including consecutive ESUS patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2024. LVD was defined as either global systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction 30%-49%) or regional LVWMAs, unrelated to acute or recent (within 4 weeks) myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the association of LVD with a primary composite outcome (including ischemic stroke recurrence, acute coronary events, and all-cause mortality), and its components separately.

Results: Among the 556 ESUS patients (median age 71 years [IQR 60-80], 44.6% female), 95 (17.1%) had LVD, including 51 (53.7%) with reduced LVEF (30%-49%), and 81 (85.3%) presenting LVWMAs. During follow-up (median 30 months), LVD(+) patients had significantly higher rates of the composite outcome (41.0% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001), ischemic stroke recurrence (13.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.007), acute coronary events (7.4% vs 2.4%, p = 0.012), and all-cause mortality (28.4% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002), compared to LVD(-) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LVD independently increased the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, p = 0.032) and the composite outcome (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, p = 0.002), but not acute coronary events (aHR 1.65; 95%CI 0.54-5.01, p = 0.374), or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.62; 95%CI 0.98-2.70, p = 0.062).

Conclusions: LVD is significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and adverse outcomes in ESUS patients. These findings highlight the clinical importance of identifying and optimizing LVD management among ESUS to improve long-term outcomes in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
期刊最新文献
Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke and baseline MRI. Screening tools for malignancy in patients with cryptogenic stroke: Systematic review. Impact of central adjudication of the score on the modified Rankin Scale in an international, randomized, acute stroke trial. Carotid Artery Stenting during Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic Stroke (CASES) study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Cerebral thrombus analysis as a useful diagnostic tool for infective endocarditis in ischemic stroke patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1