在全膝关节置换术后,额外剂量静脉地塞米松可替代患者自控镇痛,同时减少阿片类药物并发症。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1055/a-2509-3502
Jisu Park, Moon Jong Chang, Tae Woo Kim, Chong Bum Chang, Seung-Baik Kang
{"title":"在全膝关节置换术后,额外剂量静脉地塞米松可替代患者自控镇痛,同时减少阿片类药物并发症。","authors":"Jisu Park, Moon Jong Chang, Tae Woo Kim, Chong Bum Chang, Seung-Baik Kang","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether IV dexamethasone, within the current multimodal pain management protocol, (1) could maintain postoperative pain at a comparable level without IV PCA, (2) could reduce opioids-related side effects, and (3) whether an additional dose of dexamethasone on POD 2 would offer further pain-relieving effect without increasing the risk of complications. Methods A total of 178 patients (182 knees) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis were included in the study. The patients were divided into Dexa 2 & PCA and Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. From operative day to POD 5, pain visual analogue score (VAS), rescue opioids consumption, episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), antiemetics usage, and side effects of opioids such as postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and constipation were checked. For safety, wound complication and infection were checked. Results There was no difference in pain VAS between the two groups during all six perioperative days. Rescue opioids consumption was lower in Dexa 2 & PCA group. Total dosage of used opioids for six perioperative days was lower in Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. Dexa 3 & No PCA group had less PONV and POUR. There was a marked increase in pain VAS and the use of rescue opioids from POD 1 to POD 2 in the Dexa 2 & PCA. There were no wound problems or infections in either group. Conclusion Under the current multimodal pain management protocol, comparable level of postoperative pain could be achieved by dexamethasone without the need of IV PCA. By not using IV PCA, overall opioid usage was reduced, which could lead to a lower frequency of PONV and POUR. While there is still room for further research on the duration and frequency of administering dexamethasone, additional administration on POD 2 is believed to provide additional pain management benefits compared to administering only until POD 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional Dose of Intravenous Dexamethasone Can Replace Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Pain Control after Total Knee Arthroplasty while Reducing Opioid Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Jisu Park, Moon Jong Chang, Tae Woo Kim, Chong Bum Chang, Seung-Baik Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2509-3502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether IV dexamethasone, within the current multimodal pain management protocol, (1) could maintain postoperative pain at a comparable level without IV PCA, (2) could reduce opioids-related side effects, and (3) whether an additional dose of dexamethasone on POD 2 would offer further pain-relieving effect without increasing the risk of complications. Methods A total of 178 patients (182 knees) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis were included in the study. The patients were divided into Dexa 2 & PCA and Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. From operative day to POD 5, pain visual analogue score (VAS), rescue opioids consumption, episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), antiemetics usage, and side effects of opioids such as postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and constipation were checked. For safety, wound complication and infection were checked. Results There was no difference in pain VAS between the two groups during all six perioperative days. Rescue opioids consumption was lower in Dexa 2 & PCA group. Total dosage of used opioids for six perioperative days was lower in Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. Dexa 3 & No PCA group had less PONV and POUR. There was a marked increase in pain VAS and the use of rescue opioids from POD 1 to POD 2 in the Dexa 2 & PCA. There were no wound problems or infections in either group. Conclusion Under the current multimodal pain management protocol, comparable level of postoperative pain could be achieved by dexamethasone without the need of IV PCA. By not using IV PCA, overall opioid usage was reduced, which could lead to a lower frequency of PONV and POUR. While there is still room for further research on the duration and frequency of administering dexamethasone, additional administration on POD 2 is believed to provide additional pain management benefits compared to administering only until POD 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-3502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-3502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在目前的多模式疼痛管理方案下,静脉注射地塞米松是否可以(1)在没有静脉注射PCA的情况下将术后疼痛维持在相当水平,(2)可以减少阿片类药物相关的副作用,以及(3)在POD 2上额外剂量的地塞米松是否可以提供进一步的疼痛缓解效果而不增加并发症的风险。方法采用全膝关节置换术(TKA)治疗骨性关节炎患者178例(182个膝关节)。患者分为Dexa 2 + PCA组和Dexa 3 + NoPCA组。从手术当天到POD 5,检查疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、救援阿片类药物消耗、术后恶心呕吐发作(PONV)、止吐药使用情况以及阿片类药物的副作用,如术后尿潴留(POUR)和便秘。为安全起见,检查伤口并发症和感染情况。结果两组患者围手术期6天疼痛VAS评分均无差异。Dexa 2和PCA组的救援阿片类药物用量较低。Dexa 3和NoPCA组围手术期6天使用阿片类药物总剂量较低。Dexa 3和No PCA组PONV和POUR较低。在Dexa 2和PCA中,从POD 1到POD 2,疼痛VAS和救援阿片类药物的使用显着增加。两组均无伤口问题或感染。结论在目前的多模式疼痛管理方案下,使用地塞米松可以达到相当水平的术后疼痛,而无需静脉PCA。通过不使用静脉PCA,总体阿片类药物使用减少,这可能导致PONV和POUR的频率降低。虽然对地塞米松给药的持续时间和频率仍有进一步研究的余地,但与只给药至第1次给药相比,在第2次给药被认为提供了额外的疼痛管理益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Additional Dose of Intravenous Dexamethasone Can Replace Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Pain Control after Total Knee Arthroplasty while Reducing Opioid Complications.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether IV dexamethasone, within the current multimodal pain management protocol, (1) could maintain postoperative pain at a comparable level without IV PCA, (2) could reduce opioids-related side effects, and (3) whether an additional dose of dexamethasone on POD 2 would offer further pain-relieving effect without increasing the risk of complications. Methods A total of 178 patients (182 knees) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis were included in the study. The patients were divided into Dexa 2 & PCA and Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. From operative day to POD 5, pain visual analogue score (VAS), rescue opioids consumption, episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), antiemetics usage, and side effects of opioids such as postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and constipation were checked. For safety, wound complication and infection were checked. Results There was no difference in pain VAS between the two groups during all six perioperative days. Rescue opioids consumption was lower in Dexa 2 & PCA group. Total dosage of used opioids for six perioperative days was lower in Dexa 3 & NoPCA group. Dexa 3 & No PCA group had less PONV and POUR. There was a marked increase in pain VAS and the use of rescue opioids from POD 1 to POD 2 in the Dexa 2 & PCA. There were no wound problems or infections in either group. Conclusion Under the current multimodal pain management protocol, comparable level of postoperative pain could be achieved by dexamethasone without the need of IV PCA. By not using IV PCA, overall opioid usage was reduced, which could lead to a lower frequency of PONV and POUR. While there is still room for further research on the duration and frequency of administering dexamethasone, additional administration on POD 2 is believed to provide additional pain management benefits compared to administering only until POD 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Utilization of Smartphone Technology and Wearable Technology Following TKA. Functional Assessment of Meniscus Extrusion, Excursion and Hoop Strain UnderClinicallyRelevantLoadedRangeofMotionConditions inMeniscus-IntactandMeniscusRoot-DeficientKneesUsingaNovelBiomechanicalModel. Risk Factors and Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Worsening after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Correlation between anthropometric parameters and anterior cruciate ligament, hamstring tendon, and posterior horn of medial and lateral meniscus sizes. Radiological Characteristics of the Knee in Young Patients with Medial Meniscus Horizontal Tears.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1