{"title":"支持基础发现研究:质量重于数量。","authors":"Angela M. Gronenborn","doi":"10.1111/febs.17386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapidly emerging technologies, such as generative AI tools, have already had a reverberating impact on science and society. The notion that such tools could be entrusted with ‘mapping’ the trajectory of scientific discovery toward immediate measurable applications, however, is problematic. I instead argue that curiosity-driven fundamental research should remain the base upon which to build progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":94226,"journal":{"name":"The FEBS journal","volume":"292 5","pages":"933-935"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/febs.17386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Championing fundamental discovery research: quality over quantity\",\"authors\":\"Angela M. Gronenborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/febs.17386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rapidly emerging technologies, such as generative AI tools, have already had a reverberating impact on science and society. The notion that such tools could be entrusted with ‘mapping’ the trajectory of scientific discovery toward immediate measurable applications, however, is problematic. I instead argue that curiosity-driven fundamental research should remain the base upon which to build progress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The FEBS journal\",\"volume\":\"292 5\",\"pages\":\"933-935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/febs.17386\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The FEBS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/febs.17386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FEBS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/febs.17386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Championing fundamental discovery research: quality over quantity
Rapidly emerging technologies, such as generative AI tools, have already had a reverberating impact on science and society. The notion that such tools could be entrusted with ‘mapping’ the trajectory of scientific discovery toward immediate measurable applications, however, is problematic. I instead argue that curiosity-driven fundamental research should remain the base upon which to build progress.