颅底动脉闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中中通道数和无效再灌注的影响。

Isabel Siow, Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan, Keng Siang Lee, Dominic Wei Ting Yap, Ching-Hui Sia, Anil Gopinathan, Cunli Yang, Pervinder Bhogal, Erika Lam, Oliver Spooner, Lukas Meyer, Jens Fiehler, Panagiotis Papanagiotou, Andreas Kastrup, Maria Alexandrou, Seraphine Kutschke, Qingyu Wu, Anastasios Mpotsaris, Volker Maus, Tommy Anderson, Vamsi Gontu, Fabian Arnberg, Tsong Hai Lee, Bernard Pak Li Chan, Raymond Cs Seet, Hock Luen Teoh, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo
{"title":"颅底动脉闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中中通道数和无效再灌注的影响。","authors":"Isabel Siow, Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan, Keng Siang Lee, Dominic Wei Ting Yap, Ching-Hui Sia, Anil Gopinathan, Cunli Yang, Pervinder Bhogal, Erika Lam, Oliver Spooner, Lukas Meyer, Jens Fiehler, Panagiotis Papanagiotou, Andreas Kastrup, Maria Alexandrou, Seraphine Kutschke, Qingyu Wu, Anastasios Mpotsaris, Volker Maus, Tommy Anderson, Vamsi Gontu, Fabian Arnberg, Tsong Hai Lee, Bernard Pak Li Chan, Raymond Cs Seet, Hock Luen Teoh, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. A vital modifiable factor is successful reperfusion. While multiple passes improve the rates of successful reperfusion, previous studies have reported progressively diminishing returns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between number of passes and outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients who were treated with MT for acute BAO from eight comprehensive stroke centres between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (FFO) defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 measured at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and mortality. Patients were stratified according to reperfusion status and the number of passes for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for FFO 90 days for each additional pass of a thrombectomy device was 0.56 (P = 0.003). When ≤3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion led to higher rates of FFOs. However, when >3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion no longer led to higher rates of FFOs (FFO = 0% in patients who did not achieve reperfusion vs. FFO = 14.5 in patients who achieved reperfusion; P = 0.200). Notably, increasing number of passes was associated with a non-significant trend towards higher rate of parenchymal haemorrhage (OR 1.55, P = 0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute BAO patients treated with up to three passes of a thrombectomy device derived improved functional outcomes from reperfusion compared to those with more than three passes. Further prospective cohort studies are necessary to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of number of passes and futile reperfusion in basilar artery occlusion acute ischaemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Siow, Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan, Keng Siang Lee, Dominic Wei Ting Yap, Ching-Hui Sia, Anil Gopinathan, Cunli Yang, Pervinder Bhogal, Erika Lam, Oliver Spooner, Lukas Meyer, Jens Fiehler, Panagiotis Papanagiotou, Andreas Kastrup, Maria Alexandrou, Seraphine Kutschke, Qingyu Wu, Anastasios Mpotsaris, Volker Maus, Tommy Anderson, Vamsi Gontu, Fabian Arnberg, Tsong Hai Lee, Bernard Pak Li Chan, Raymond Cs Seet, Hock Luen Teoh, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. A vital modifiable factor is successful reperfusion. While multiple passes improve the rates of successful reperfusion, previous studies have reported progressively diminishing returns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between number of passes and outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients who were treated with MT for acute BAO from eight comprehensive stroke centres between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (FFO) defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 measured at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and mortality. Patients were stratified according to reperfusion status and the number of passes for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for FFO 90 days for each additional pass of a thrombectomy device was 0.56 (P = 0.003). When ≤3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion led to higher rates of FFOs. However, when >3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion no longer led to higher rates of FFOs (FFO = 0% in patients who did not achieve reperfusion vs. FFO = 14.5 in patients who achieved reperfusion; P = 0.200). Notably, increasing number of passes was associated with a non-significant trend towards higher rate of parenchymal haemorrhage (OR 1.55, P = 0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute BAO patients treated with up to three passes of a thrombectomy device derived improved functional outcomes from reperfusion compared to those with more than three passes. Further prospective cohort studies are necessary to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:机械取栓(MT)是治疗前循环大血管闭塞的标准方法。再灌注成功是一个重要的可改变因素。虽然多次通过可以提高再灌注成功率,但先前的研究报告表明,再灌注成功率逐渐降低。本研究旨在探讨基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者通过次数与预后的关系。方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年至2020年间8个卒中综合中心接受MT治疗的急性BAO患者。主要终点是良好的功能终点(FFO),定义为90天测量的修正Rankin量表(mRS) 0-3。次要结局包括自发性颅内出血和死亡率。根据再灌注状态和通过次数对患者进行分层,进一步分析。结果:每增加一次取栓装置,FFO 90天的调整优势比(OR)为0.56 (P = 0.003)。当取栓装置通过≤3次时,实现再灌注可导致较高的ffo率。然而,当取栓装置通过b>3通道时,实现再灌注不再导致更高的FFO率(未实现再灌注的患者FFO = 0%,而实现再灌注的患者FFO = 14.5;P = 0.200)。值得注意的是,通过次数的增加与实质出血发生率升高的非显著趋势相关(OR 1.55, P = 0.055)。结论:与超过三次取栓装置治疗的急性BAO患者相比,接受最多三次取栓装置治疗的患者从再灌注中获得了更好的功能预后。需要进一步的前瞻性队列研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of number of passes and futile reperfusion in basilar artery occlusion acute ischaemic stroke.

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. A vital modifiable factor is successful reperfusion. While multiple passes improve the rates of successful reperfusion, previous studies have reported progressively diminishing returns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between number of passes and outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients who were treated with MT for acute BAO from eight comprehensive stroke centres between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (FFO) defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 measured at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and mortality. Patients were stratified according to reperfusion status and the number of passes for further analysis.

Results: The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for FFO 90 days for each additional pass of a thrombectomy device was 0.56 (P = 0.003). When ≤3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion led to higher rates of FFOs. However, when >3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion no longer led to higher rates of FFOs (FFO = 0% in patients who did not achieve reperfusion vs. FFO = 14.5 in patients who achieved reperfusion; P = 0.200). Notably, increasing number of passes was associated with a non-significant trend towards higher rate of parenchymal haemorrhage (OR 1.55, P = 0.055).

Conclusion: Acute BAO patients treated with up to three passes of a thrombectomy device derived improved functional outcomes from reperfusion compared to those with more than three passes. Further prospective cohort studies are necessary to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of number of passes and futile reperfusion in basilar artery occlusion acute ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials of dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: an updated meta-analysis. Conservative management of advanced chronic kidney disease in primary care setting. Navigating the next lap: 2025 and beyond. Pictorial review of ischaemic hepatitis and its mimics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1