{"title":"在不同组织中定位边缘化身份","authors":"Laura Morgan Roberts , Stella Nkomo","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People with marginalized identities must often manage the diversity dynamics that are activated by their presence in organizations. Due to underrepresentation and stigmatization, they cope with a range of identity threats while navigating diverse settings. A host of studies over the past twenty-five years have examined the wide range of verbal and nonverbal tactics that people use to suppress and express their devalued versus valued social identities at work. Recent research has begun to specify the conditions under which different identity management tactics positively or negatively impact individual well-being, interpersonal relationships across difference, and important evaluations and outcomes (e.g., admissions, hiring). Less attention has been devoted to how members of marginalized groups directly and indirectly shape others' perceptions of them through emotional expressions and status signals. This review illuminates how people proactively affirm others’ identities in order to bolster or protect their own, using a wide range of identity management tactics. As featured in this article, global studies of marginalized identity management tactics include nuanced portrayals of intersectionality, as people cope with threats to multiple identity group memberships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101983"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating marginalized identities in diverse organizations\",\"authors\":\"Laura Morgan Roberts , Stella Nkomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>People with marginalized identities must often manage the diversity dynamics that are activated by their presence in organizations. Due to underrepresentation and stigmatization, they cope with a range of identity threats while navigating diverse settings. A host of studies over the past twenty-five years have examined the wide range of verbal and nonverbal tactics that people use to suppress and express their devalued versus valued social identities at work. Recent research has begun to specify the conditions under which different identity management tactics positively or negatively impact individual well-being, interpersonal relationships across difference, and important evaluations and outcomes (e.g., admissions, hiring). Less attention has been devoted to how members of marginalized groups directly and indirectly shape others' perceptions of them through emotional expressions and status signals. This review illuminates how people proactively affirm others’ identities in order to bolster or protect their own, using a wide range of identity management tactics. As featured in this article, global studies of marginalized identity management tactics include nuanced portrayals of intersectionality, as people cope with threats to multiple identity group memberships.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24001969\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24001969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating marginalized identities in diverse organizations
People with marginalized identities must often manage the diversity dynamics that are activated by their presence in organizations. Due to underrepresentation and stigmatization, they cope with a range of identity threats while navigating diverse settings. A host of studies over the past twenty-five years have examined the wide range of verbal and nonverbal tactics that people use to suppress and express their devalued versus valued social identities at work. Recent research has begun to specify the conditions under which different identity management tactics positively or negatively impact individual well-being, interpersonal relationships across difference, and important evaluations and outcomes (e.g., admissions, hiring). Less attention has been devoted to how members of marginalized groups directly and indirectly shape others' perceptions of them through emotional expressions and status signals. This review illuminates how people proactively affirm others’ identities in order to bolster or protect their own, using a wide range of identity management tactics. As featured in this article, global studies of marginalized identity management tactics include nuanced portrayals of intersectionality, as people cope with threats to multiple identity group memberships.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology