{"title":"理解生命起源时复杂生化系统的知识框架","authors":"Burckhard Seelig, Irene A. Chen","doi":"10.1038/s41557-024-01698-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the emergence of complex biochemical systems, such as protein translation, is a great challenge. Although synthetic approaches can provide insight into the potential early stages of life, they do not address the equally important question of why the complex systems of life would have evolved. In particular, the intricacies of the mechanisms governing the transfer of information from nucleic acid sequences to proteins make it difficult to imagine how coded protein synthesis could have emerged from a prebiotic soup. Here we discuss the use of intellectual frameworks in studying the emergence of life. We discuss how one such framework, namely the RNA world theory, has spurred research, and provide an overview of its limitations. We suggest that the emergence of coded protein synthesis could be broken into experimentally tractable problems by treating it as a molecular bricolage—a complex system integrating many different parts, each of which originally evolved for uses unrelated to its modern function—to promote a concrete understanding of its origin. It has been challenging to rationalize the emergence of complex biochemical systems because many parts with different functions needed to come together. This Perspective proposes a molecular bricolage—an evolutionary tinkering involving parts that initially evolved for unrelated functions—to provide an intellectual framework to study the origin of protein translation.","PeriodicalId":18909,"journal":{"name":"Nature chemistry","volume":"17 1","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":19.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual frameworks to understand complex biochemical systems at the origin of life\",\"authors\":\"Burckhard Seelig, Irene A. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41557-024-01698-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the emergence of complex biochemical systems, such as protein translation, is a great challenge. Although synthetic approaches can provide insight into the potential early stages of life, they do not address the equally important question of why the complex systems of life would have evolved. In particular, the intricacies of the mechanisms governing the transfer of information from nucleic acid sequences to proteins make it difficult to imagine how coded protein synthesis could have emerged from a prebiotic soup. Here we discuss the use of intellectual frameworks in studying the emergence of life. We discuss how one such framework, namely the RNA world theory, has spurred research, and provide an overview of its limitations. We suggest that the emergence of coded protein synthesis could be broken into experimentally tractable problems by treating it as a molecular bricolage—a complex system integrating many different parts, each of which originally evolved for uses unrelated to its modern function—to promote a concrete understanding of its origin. It has been challenging to rationalize the emergence of complex biochemical systems because many parts with different functions needed to come together. This Perspective proposes a molecular bricolage—an evolutionary tinkering involving parts that initially evolved for unrelated functions—to provide an intellectual framework to study the origin of protein translation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature chemistry\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"11-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-024-01698-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-024-01698-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intellectual frameworks to understand complex biochemical systems at the origin of life
Understanding the emergence of complex biochemical systems, such as protein translation, is a great challenge. Although synthetic approaches can provide insight into the potential early stages of life, they do not address the equally important question of why the complex systems of life would have evolved. In particular, the intricacies of the mechanisms governing the transfer of information from nucleic acid sequences to proteins make it difficult to imagine how coded protein synthesis could have emerged from a prebiotic soup. Here we discuss the use of intellectual frameworks in studying the emergence of life. We discuss how one such framework, namely the RNA world theory, has spurred research, and provide an overview of its limitations. We suggest that the emergence of coded protein synthesis could be broken into experimentally tractable problems by treating it as a molecular bricolage—a complex system integrating many different parts, each of which originally evolved for uses unrelated to its modern function—to promote a concrete understanding of its origin. It has been challenging to rationalize the emergence of complex biochemical systems because many parts with different functions needed to come together. This Perspective proposes a molecular bricolage—an evolutionary tinkering involving parts that initially evolved for unrelated functions—to provide an intellectual framework to study the origin of protein translation.
期刊介绍:
Nature Chemistry is a monthly journal that publishes groundbreaking and significant research in all areas of chemistry. It covers traditional subjects such as analytical, inorganic, organic, and physical chemistry, as well as a wide range of other topics including catalysis, computational and theoretical chemistry, and environmental chemistry.
The journal also features interdisciplinary research at the interface of chemistry with biology, materials science, nanotechnology, and physics. Manuscripts detailing such multidisciplinary work are encouraged, as long as the central theme pertains to chemistry.
Aside from primary research, Nature Chemistry publishes review articles, news and views, research highlights from other journals, commentaries, book reviews, correspondence, and analysis of the broader chemical landscape. It also addresses crucial issues related to education, funding, policy, intellectual property, and the societal impact of chemistry.
Nature Chemistry is dedicated to ensuring the highest standards of original research through a fair and rigorous review process. It offers authors maximum visibility for their papers, access to a broad readership, exceptional copy editing and production standards, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests.
Overall, Nature Chemistry aims to be the authoritative voice of the global chemical community.