{"title":"透明帽辅助和常规结肠镜检查结肠腺瘤检出率的比较:来自亚洲一项国际试验的结果。","authors":"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda","doi":"10.1159/000543296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.\",\"authors\":\"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:关于透明帽辅助技术提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率(ADR)的争议仍然存在。我们的目的是探讨透明帽辅助结肠镜检查对不良反应和其他结肠镜检查性能的影响。方法:我们对一个国际、多中心、开放标签的数据库进行了亚分析,该数据库包含来自4个亚洲国家/地区11个中心的结肠镜检查数据。前瞻性记录所有检测到的病变的患者特征、手术相关特征和病理结果。患者分为两组,分别接受有或没有透明帽附着的结肠镜检查。比较两组患者的不良反应及手术时间。对其他与ADR相关的程序性因素也进行了调查。结果:在2020年11月至2022年1月期间,3029例患者接受了结肠镜检查(透明帽辅助结肠镜检查,n= 1796;标准结肠镜检查(n=1,233)纳入本研究。透明帽辅助结肠镜组不良反应明显高于常规结肠镜组(55.1% vs 50.0%)。结论:在实际应用中,透明帽辅助结肠镜是一种安全、廉价的技术,可以提高腺瘤和息肉的检出率。
Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.
Introduction: Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.
Methods: We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.
Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.
Conclusion: In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.