透明帽辅助和常规结肠镜检查结肠腺瘤检出率的比较:来自亚洲一项国际试验的结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1159/000543296
Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda
{"title":"透明帽辅助和常规结肠镜检查结肠腺瘤检出率的比较:来自亚洲一项国际试验的结果。","authors":"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda","doi":"10.1159/000543296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.\",\"authors\":\"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:关于透明帽辅助技术提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率(ADR)的争议仍然存在。我们的目的是探讨透明帽辅助结肠镜检查对不良反应和其他结肠镜检查性能的影响。方法:我们对一个国际、多中心、开放标签的数据库进行了亚分析,该数据库包含来自4个亚洲国家/地区11个中心的结肠镜检查数据。前瞻性记录所有检测到的病变的患者特征、手术相关特征和病理结果。患者分为两组,分别接受有或没有透明帽附着的结肠镜检查。比较两组患者的不良反应及手术时间。对其他与ADR相关的程序性因素也进行了调查。结果:在2020年11月至2022年1月期间,3029例患者接受了结肠镜检查(透明帽辅助结肠镜检查,n= 1796;标准结肠镜检查(n=1,233)纳入本研究。透明帽辅助结肠镜组不良反应明显高于常规结肠镜组(55.1% vs 50.0%)。结论:在实际应用中,透明帽辅助结肠镜是一种安全、廉价的技术,可以提高腺瘤和息肉的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.

Introduction: Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.

Methods: We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.

Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.

Conclusion: In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
期刊最新文献
Markers of Prognosis for Acute Esophageal Necrosis: A Systematic Review. Prevalence and endoscopic features of colorectal non-polypoid lesions: a single-center retrospective study from a large cohort of FIT-positive screening patients in Northern Italy. Comparison of genetic mutations of gastric cancer diagnosed before or after H. pylori eradication and between differentiated and undifferentiated types using next-generation sequencing. Symptom Reporting in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Higher Burden of Symptoms detection using an interactive App. Association between the Achievement of Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery (TOLS) and Overall Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Following Major Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1