{"title":"喷他脒与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗非hiv患者肺囊虫性肺炎的疗效比较:一项日本全国回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the Outcomes of Pentamidine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients: A Nationwide Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
没有人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的肺囊虫性肺炎(PCP)患者的一线治疗方案数据有限。因此,我们比较了喷他脒与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)在非hiv PCP患者中的疗效。方法采用日本诊断程序综合住院患者数据库中的数据。我们纳入了在2010年7月至2022年3月期间最初接受TMP-SMX或喷他脒治疗的非hiv PCP患者。我们将符合条件的患者分为TMP-SMX组和喷他脒组,并进行倾向评分重叠加权分析以比较两组之间的住院死亡率。结果在5870例符合条件的患者中,分别有5456例和414例接受了TMP-SMX和喷他脒治疗。倾向评分重叠加权分析显示,喷他脒治疗的住院死亡率高于TMP-SMX治疗(23.6% vs 40.1%;风险差,16.5%;95%置信区间为10.8-22.2%;p
Comparison between the Outcomes of Pentamidine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients: A Nationwide Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.
期刊介绍:
Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine.
Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.