非阿片类药物与阿片类药物在阻生第三磨牙拔牙后的镇痛作用:阿片类药物镇痛减少研究的随机临床试验。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the American Dental Association Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014
Cecile A Feldman, Janine Fredericks-Younger, Paul J Desjardins, Hans Malmstrom, Michael Miloro, Gary Warburton, Brent B Ward, Vincent B Ziccardi, Patricia Greenberg, Tracy Andrews, Pamela B Matheson, Rafael Benoliel, Daniel H Fine, Shou-En Lu
{"title":"非阿片类药物与阿片类药物在阻生第三磨牙拔牙后的镇痛作用:阿片类药物镇痛减少研究的随机临床试验。","authors":"Cecile A Feldman, Janine Fredericks-Younger, Paul J Desjardins, Hans Malmstrom, Michael Miloro, Gary Warburton, Brent B Ward, Vincent B Ziccardi, Patricia Greenberg, Tracy Andrews, Pamela B Matheson, Rafael Benoliel, Daniel H Fine, Shou-En Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery. Participants were randomized to receive 5 mg of hydrocodone with 300 mg of acetaminophen (opioid) or 400 mg of ibuprofen and 500 mg of acetaminophen (nonopioid). After an initial dose, analgesic was taken every 4 through 6 hours as needed for pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this randomized multisite clinical trial (n = 1,815 adults), those not taking opioids experienced significantly less pain (numeric rating scale ranging from 0 [no pain] through 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for first day and night (mean difference, -0.70; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.45; P < .001) and second day and night (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.04; P = .015), and experienced no more pain than participants taking opioids over the entire postoperative period (mean difference, -0.20; 98.75% CI, -0.45 to 0.05; P = .172). Participants not taking opioids had higher overall satisfaction at the postoperative visit (85.3% extremely satisfied or satisfied vs 78.9%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.98; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ibuprofen and acetaminophen combination managed pain better for the first 2 days and led to greater satisfaction over the entire postoperative period than hydrocodone with acetaminophen. At no time did hydrocodone outperform the nonopioid.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Routine opioid prescribing after dental surgery is not supported. The results of this study confirmed the American Dental Association's recommendations that ibuprofen and acetaminophen in combination should be the first-line therapy for acute pain management. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration number is NCT04452344.</p>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonopioid vs opioid analgesics after impacted third-molar extractions: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cecile A Feldman, Janine Fredericks-Younger, Paul J Desjardins, Hans Malmstrom, Michael Miloro, Gary Warburton, Brent B Ward, Vincent B Ziccardi, Patricia Greenberg, Tracy Andrews, Pamela B Matheson, Rafael Benoliel, Daniel H Fine, Shou-En Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery. Participants were randomized to receive 5 mg of hydrocodone with 300 mg of acetaminophen (opioid) or 400 mg of ibuprofen and 500 mg of acetaminophen (nonopioid). After an initial dose, analgesic was taken every 4 through 6 hours as needed for pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this randomized multisite clinical trial (n = 1,815 adults), those not taking opioids experienced significantly less pain (numeric rating scale ranging from 0 [no pain] through 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for first day and night (mean difference, -0.70; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.45; P < .001) and second day and night (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.04; P = .015), and experienced no more pain than participants taking opioids over the entire postoperative period (mean difference, -0.20; 98.75% CI, -0.45 to 0.05; P = .172). Participants not taking opioids had higher overall satisfaction at the postoperative visit (85.3% extremely satisfied or satisfied vs 78.9%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.98; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ibuprofen and acetaminophen combination managed pain better for the first 2 days and led to greater satisfaction over the entire postoperative period than hydrocodone with acetaminophen. At no time did hydrocodone outperform the nonopioid.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Routine opioid prescribing after dental surgery is not supported. The results of this study confirmed the American Dental Association's recommendations that ibuprofen and acetaminophen in combination should be the first-line therapy for acute pain management. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration number is NCT04452344.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物仍被用于治疗急性术后疼痛。不必要的阿片类药物处方可能导致成瘾和死亡,因为未使用的药片很容易被转移。方法:为了确定联合非阿片类镇痛药是否至少与阿片类镇痛药一样好,我们进行了一项多地点、双盲、随机、分层、非劣效性的比较疗效试验,以患者为中心检查下颌阻生第三磨牙拔牙手术后的结果。参与者随机接受5毫克氢可酮和300毫克对乙酰氨基酚(阿片类药物)或400毫克布洛芬和500毫克对乙酰氨基酚(非阿片类药物)。初始剂量后,根据疼痛需要每4至6小时服用一次镇痛药。结果:在这项随机多地点临床试验中(n = 1815名成年人),未服用阿片类药物的患者在第一天和晚上的疼痛明显减轻(数值评定量表从0[无疼痛]到10[可想象的最严重疼痛])(平均差值为-0.70;95% CI, -0.94 ~ -0.45;P < 0.001)和第二次白天和晚上(平均差异,-0.28;95% CI, -0.52 ~ -0.04;P = 0.015),并且在整个术后期间没有比服用阿片类药物的参与者经历更多的疼痛(平均差异为-0.20;98.75% CI, -0.45 ~ 0.05;P = .172)。未服用阿片类药物的参与者在术后访问时总体满意度更高(85.3%非常满意或满意vs 78.9%;95% CI, 1.21 ~ 1.98;P = .006)。结论:布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚联用治疗术后2天疼痛的效果优于氢可酮与对乙酰氨基酚联用治疗。氢可酮在任何时候都没有超过非阿片类药物。实际意义:不支持牙科手术后常规阿片类药物处方。这项研究的结果证实了美国牙科协会的建议,即布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚联合使用应该是治疗急性疼痛的一线治疗方法。该临床试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov网站注册。注册号为NCT04452344。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonopioid vs opioid analgesics after impacted third-molar extractions: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study randomized clinical trial.

Background: Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted.

Methods: To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery. Participants were randomized to receive 5 mg of hydrocodone with 300 mg of acetaminophen (opioid) or 400 mg of ibuprofen and 500 mg of acetaminophen (nonopioid). After an initial dose, analgesic was taken every 4 through 6 hours as needed for pain.

Results: In this randomized multisite clinical trial (n = 1,815 adults), those not taking opioids experienced significantly less pain (numeric rating scale ranging from 0 [no pain] through 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for first day and night (mean difference, -0.70; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.45; P < .001) and second day and night (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.04; P = .015), and experienced no more pain than participants taking opioids over the entire postoperative period (mean difference, -0.20; 98.75% CI, -0.45 to 0.05; P = .172). Participants not taking opioids had higher overall satisfaction at the postoperative visit (85.3% extremely satisfied or satisfied vs 78.9%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.98; P = .006).

Conclusions: The ibuprofen and acetaminophen combination managed pain better for the first 2 days and led to greater satisfaction over the entire postoperative period than hydrocodone with acetaminophen. At no time did hydrocodone outperform the nonopioid.

Practical implications: Routine opioid prescribing after dental surgery is not supported. The results of this study confirmed the American Dental Association's recommendations that ibuprofen and acetaminophen in combination should be the first-line therapy for acute pain management. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration number is NCT04452344.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Video Quality. Addressing challenges of prenatal oral health care: It is time for pregnant people to have the oral health care they deserve. Association of periodontal disease and the prevalence of acute periapical abscesses. Use of oral health services among pregnant women and associations with gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Insights from the 2016-2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Dentistry has been put on notice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1