Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间国家养老院基本护理人员计划的变化","authors":"Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai","doi":"10.1177/07334648241309764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. <b>Conclusion:</b> States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648241309764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in State Essential Caregiver Programs for Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07334648241309764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. <b>Conclusion:</b> States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7334648241309764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241309764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241309764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variations in State Essential Caregiver Programs for Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Background: During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. Methods: We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. Results: Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. Conclusion: States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.