2019冠状病毒病大流行期间国家养老院基本护理人员计划的变化

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Applied Gerontology Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1177/07334648241309764
Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间国家养老院基本护理人员计划的变化","authors":"Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai","doi":"10.1177/07334648241309764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. <b>Conclusion:</b> States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648241309764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in State Essential Caregiver Programs for Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Li, Daniel Maeng, H Benjamin Lee, Yusheng Jia, Xueya Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07334648241309764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. <b>Conclusion:</b> States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7334648241309764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241309764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241309764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在2020- 2021年期间,各州建立了基本护理人员(EC)计划,使养老院居民能够在COVID-19大流行期间获得面对面的支持。本研究提供了这些程序设计的比较数据。方法:我们对2020- 2022年发布的联邦和州养老院访问和重新开放指南进行了在线搜索。我们还比较了有和没有EC计划的州在养老院居民或一般人群中COVID-19感染率和死亡率、养老院工作人员短缺率以及社会距离政策限制程度排名方面的差异。在有EC项目的州中,我们总结了项目的主要特征。结果:20个州在2020年底至2021年初建立了养老院EC计划。与没有实施EC计划的州相比,实施EC计划的州的COVID-19感染率略高,但COVID-19死亡率略低,养老院的护士配备和护理辅助器具短缺率相似,在社交距离措施的限制性方面排名略低。与CMS指南禁止在2020年3月至2021年11月期间在特定情况下到养老院进行室内探访相比,州EC计划在规定护理人员探访方面的限制要少得多,例如,当县COVID-19阳性率为10%(18个计划)、居民未接种疫苗(20个计划)或养老院处于COVID-19爆发(13个计划)时,允许探访。然而,在某些情况下,国家EC计划可能仍然禁止访问EC,例如当居民处于基于传播的预防措施(13个计划)时,即当居民已确诊感染COVID-19,但尚未确诊有COVID-19症状,或在养老院(重新)入院的14天内观察是否出现COVID-19感染。结论:有养老院EC计划的州和没有养老院EC计划的州在COVID-19感染率和死亡率或养老院人员短缺率方面没有明显差异,尽管有EC计划的州的社会距离政策可能稍微宽松一些。国家EC计划在关键设计上有很大的不同。为了了解这些项目的有效性,需要进行比较评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variations in State Essential Caregiver Programs for Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: During 2020-21, states established essential caregiver (EC) programs which allowed nursing home residents to receive in-person supports during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents comparative data on the designs of these programs. Methods: We conducted on-line searches for federal and states' nursing home visitation and reopening guidelines published in 2020-22. We also compared differences between states with and without an EC program in COVID-19 infection and death rates among nursing home residents or the general population, nursing home staff shortage rates, and rankings on restrictiveness of social distancing policies. Among states with an EC program, we summarized key program characteristics. Results: Twenty states established nursing home EC program from late 2020 to early 2021. Compared to states without an EC program, states with the program had slightly higher COVID-19 infection rate but slightly lower COVID-19 death rate, similar nurse staffing and nursing aids shortage rates in nursing homes, and somewhat lower rankings on the restrictiveness of social distancing measures. Compared to CMS guidelines that banned indoor visits to nursing homes under defined circumstances from March 2020 to November 2021, state EC programs were much less restrictive in specifying caregiver visits, for example, visits were allowed when county COVID-19 positivity rate>10% (18 programs), when the resident was not vaccinated (20 programs), or when the nursing home was in a COVID-19 outbreak (13 programs). However, state EC programs might still prohibit EC visits in certain situations, such as when the resident was in transmission-based precautions (13 programs), that is, when the resident had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, had COVID-19 symptoms although not yet confirmed, or was in observation for developing COVID-19 infection in the 14 days of nursing home (re)admission. Conclusion: States with and without a nursing home EC program did not differ appreciably in COVID-19 infection and death rates, or staffing shortage rates in nursing homes, although states with an EC program might have slightly less restrictive social distancing policies. State EC programs varied substantially in key designs. Comparative evaluations are needed to understand the effectiveness of these programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and Factors Associated With Nonoperative Management and Hospital Outcomes After Hip Fractures Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Retrospective Analysis. Engaging Asian American Family Caregivers in Clinical Trials: Awareness, Preferences, and Concerns. Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Incident Reversible Cognitive Frailty Based on Social-Ecological Predictors Using Generalized Linear Mixed Model and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Prospective Cohort Study. Psychotherapy Engagement Before and After a Rapid Transition to Telehealth During COVID-19 for Older Adults With Dementia. Implications of Rebalancing Home-Based Care for Family Caregivers to Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1