优惠券和州烟草政策背景作为美国报告电子烟使用的烟草使用预测因素:烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第5-6波(2018-2021)的结果。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102943
J.H. Kingsbury , H.L. Kimmel , M.J. Parks , M.R. Creamer , C. Blanco , W.M. Compton
{"title":"优惠券和州烟草政策背景作为美国报告电子烟使用的烟草使用预测因素:烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第5-6波(2018-2021)的结果。","authors":"J.H. Kingsbury ,&nbsp;H.L. Kimmel ,&nbsp;M.J. Parks ,&nbsp;M.R. Creamer ,&nbsp;C. Blanco ,&nbsp;W.M. Compton","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Receipt of cigarette and e-cigarette coupons predicts initiation and progression of use and hinders cessation. Less is known about how coupons operate in different tobacco regulatory environments. The current study utilized longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to address this research gap.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults who reported past 30-day (P30D) e-cigarette use at Wave 5 (2018–2019) were included (<em>N</em> = 3632). The primary outcome was Wave 6 (2021) P30D any tobacco use. Wave 5 predictors were receipt of e-cigarette coupons, state e-cigarette tax, state tobacco policy context, flavored e-cigarette use, income, and education. Covariates were age, sex, race, state coupon policy, and Wave 5 use of tobacco other than e-cigarettes. Weighted logistic regression models examined effects overall and in samples stratified by state e-cigarette tax and tobacco policy context.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Controlling for covariates, Wave 5 coupon receipt (AOR = 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.07, 2.31) and preference for flavored e-cigarettes (AOR = 1.70; 1.37, 2.10) were positively associated with Wave 6 tobacco use. Stronger state tobacco policy context was negatively associated with tobacco use (AOR = 0.69; 0.55, 0.88). Coupon receipt predicted tobacco use in states with an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 2.39; 1.22, 4.68) and with stronger tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.80; 1.07, 3.02), but not in states without an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 1.29; 0.83, 1.99) or with weaker tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.33; 0.78, 2.24).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policies that restrict price-discounting could help discourage e-cigarette use, reinforce e-cigarette taxes and other tobacco control policies, and promote cessation of all tobacco among those reporting e-cigarette use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 102943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupons and state tobacco policy context as predictors of tobacco use among those reporting e-cigarette use in the U.S.: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study waves 5–6 (2018–2021)\",\"authors\":\"J.H. Kingsbury ,&nbsp;H.L. Kimmel ,&nbsp;M.J. Parks ,&nbsp;M.R. Creamer ,&nbsp;C. Blanco ,&nbsp;W.M. Compton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Receipt of cigarette and e-cigarette coupons predicts initiation and progression of use and hinders cessation. Less is known about how coupons operate in different tobacco regulatory environments. The current study utilized longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to address this research gap.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults who reported past 30-day (P30D) e-cigarette use at Wave 5 (2018–2019) were included (<em>N</em> = 3632). The primary outcome was Wave 6 (2021) P30D any tobacco use. Wave 5 predictors were receipt of e-cigarette coupons, state e-cigarette tax, state tobacco policy context, flavored e-cigarette use, income, and education. Covariates were age, sex, race, state coupon policy, and Wave 5 use of tobacco other than e-cigarettes. Weighted logistic regression models examined effects overall and in samples stratified by state e-cigarette tax and tobacco policy context.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Controlling for covariates, Wave 5 coupon receipt (AOR = 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.07, 2.31) and preference for flavored e-cigarettes (AOR = 1.70; 1.37, 2.10) were positively associated with Wave 6 tobacco use. Stronger state tobacco policy context was negatively associated with tobacco use (AOR = 0.69; 0.55, 0.88). Coupon receipt predicted tobacco use in states with an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 2.39; 1.22, 4.68) and with stronger tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.80; 1.07, 3.02), but not in states without an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 1.29; 0.83, 1.99) or with weaker tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.33; 0.78, 2.24).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policies that restrict price-discounting could help discourage e-cigarette use, reinforce e-cigarette taxes and other tobacco control policies, and promote cessation of all tobacco among those reporting e-cigarette use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:收到香烟和电子烟优惠券可以预测使用的开始和进展,并阻碍戒烟。人们对优惠券在不同的烟草监管环境中如何运作知之甚少。目前的研究利用烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究的纵向数据来解决这一研究空白。方法:纳入第5波(2018-2019)报告过去30天(P30D)使用电子烟的成年人(N = 3632)。主要结局是第6波(2021年)P30D任何烟草使用。第5波预测因素是电子烟优惠券的接收、州电子烟税、州烟草政策背景、调味电子烟的使用、收入和教育。协变量为年龄、性别、种族、州券政策和第5波使用除电子烟以外的烟草。加权逻辑回归模型检验了整体影响,以及按州电子烟税和烟草政策背景分层的样本。结果:经协变量控制,第5波优惠券收据(AOR = 1.57;95% CI: 1.07, 2.31)和对调味电子烟的偏好(AOR = 1.70;1.37, 2.10)与第6波烟草使用呈正相关。较强的国家烟草政策背景与烟草使用呈负相关(AOR = 0.69;0.55, 0.88)。在征收电子烟税的州,优惠券收据预测烟草使用(AOR = 2.39;1.22, 4.68)和更强的烟草政策背景(AOR = 1.80;1.07, 3.02),但在没有征收电子烟税的州则不然(AOR = 1.29;0.83, 1.99)或烟草政策背景较弱(AOR = 1.33;0.78, 2.24)。结论:限制价格折扣的政策可能有助于阻止电子烟的使用,加强电子烟税和其他烟草控制政策,并促进报告使用电子烟的人戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coupons and state tobacco policy context as predictors of tobacco use among those reporting e-cigarette use in the U.S.: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study waves 5–6 (2018–2021)

Background

Receipt of cigarette and e-cigarette coupons predicts initiation and progression of use and hinders cessation. Less is known about how coupons operate in different tobacco regulatory environments. The current study utilized longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to address this research gap.

Methods

Adults who reported past 30-day (P30D) e-cigarette use at Wave 5 (2018–2019) were included (N = 3632). The primary outcome was Wave 6 (2021) P30D any tobacco use. Wave 5 predictors were receipt of e-cigarette coupons, state e-cigarette tax, state tobacco policy context, flavored e-cigarette use, income, and education. Covariates were age, sex, race, state coupon policy, and Wave 5 use of tobacco other than e-cigarettes. Weighted logistic regression models examined effects overall and in samples stratified by state e-cigarette tax and tobacco policy context.

Results

Controlling for covariates, Wave 5 coupon receipt (AOR = 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.07, 2.31) and preference for flavored e-cigarettes (AOR = 1.70; 1.37, 2.10) were positively associated with Wave 6 tobacco use. Stronger state tobacco policy context was negatively associated with tobacco use (AOR = 0.69; 0.55, 0.88). Coupon receipt predicted tobacco use in states with an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 2.39; 1.22, 4.68) and with stronger tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.80; 1.07, 3.02), but not in states without an e-cigarette tax (AOR = 1.29; 0.83, 1.99) or with weaker tobacco policy contexts (AOR = 1.33; 0.78, 2.24).

Conclusions

Policies that restrict price-discounting could help discourage e-cigarette use, reinforce e-cigarette taxes and other tobacco control policies, and promote cessation of all tobacco among those reporting e-cigarette use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Cardiometabolic deaths in black and white men: Tracing the risks from early- to mid-adulthood Integrating lifestyle behaviors in school education: A proactive approach to preventive medicine Editorial Board Smoke-free hospitality environments and cognitive health: A population-based study in the United States Changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health over 15 years in Wisconsin, United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1