在全肩关节置换术患者中,将PROMIS疼痛器械加入到PROMIS上肢物理功能中,与Legacy评分相比,PROMIS评分的反应性得到改善:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012
Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk
{"title":"在全肩关节置换术患者中,将PROMIS疼痛器械加入到PROMIS上肢物理功能中,与Legacy评分相比,PROMIS评分的反应性得到改善:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)在美国越来越多地被用作各种肌肉骨骼疾病的患者报告结果评估工具。然而,PROMIS上肢物理功能(P-UE)在全肩关节置换术(TSA)术后早期的反应性有限。本研究的目的是确定增加PROMIS疼痛干扰(P-Interference)或疼痛强度(P-Intensity)评分是否能提高TSA术后一年内检测术后变化的能力。方法:前瞻性纳入2020-2022年适应症和选择接受TSA的患者。在2周、6周、3个月、6个月和12个月的时间点收集前瞻性数据进行患者调查(asa、SST、wos、P-UE、p -干扰和p -强度)。使用效应量(ES)评估每个PROM的仪器响应性;响应性由每次测量的绝对值定义,以前报道为小(0.2)、中(0.5)或大(0.8)。使用R studio 4.2.3版(Boston, MA, USA)进行统计分析(两个样本t检验和Fisher检验)。结果:本研究共纳入127名受试者。在第3个月和第12个月时,所有调查工具都显示出较大的响应性(>.8)。p -强度是唯一在2周时表现出较大反应的工具,P-UE的增加在所有时间点都显示出改善的反应性。此外,在手术后12个月,与遗留措施(asas、SST和OSS)相比,p强度的增加在所有时间点的反应负担都较低,尽管与asas没有差异(p=0.55)。p -干扰和其他遗留评分显示,从术后6周开始有较大的反应性。结论:与几乎所有时间点评估的遗留措施相比,通过将结果测量与p -强度评分相结合,PROMIS UE的反应性可以得到改善,反应负担显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Introduction: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.

Methods: Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).

Results: A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.

Conclusion: The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Preoperative COVID-19 infection increases risk for 60-day complications following total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis Clinical results and computed tomography analysis of intuitive shoulder arthroplasty (ISA) stemless at a minimum follow-up of 2 years Influence of age-related bone density changes on primary stability in stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-implant finite element study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1