Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk
{"title":"在全肩关节置换术患者中,将PROMIS疼痛器械加入到PROMIS上肢物理功能中,与Legacy评分相比,PROMIS评分的反应性得到改善:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.
Introduction: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.
Methods: Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).
Results: A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.
Conclusion: The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.