Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones
{"title":"Latarjet手术中联合肌腱的“吊索效应”是真实的吗?对照实验室和比较临床研究的系统综述和描述性综合。","authors":"Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the \"sling effect\" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the \"sling effect\" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is The \\\"Sling Effect\\\" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the \\\"sling effect\\\" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the \\\"sling effect\\\" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Latarjet手术被认为是治疗存在严重肩关节骨丢失的前肩不稳患者的金标准。Latarjet的支持者认为其疗效部分归因于关节肌腱的“吊索效应”;然而,最近的研究表明,在接受游离骨阻滞(FBB)手术的患者中,前路稳定性的恢复类似。本系统综述的目的是评估吊索效应的生物力学和临床证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science和Cochrane分别查询了(1)对照实验室研究,比较了在完整拉伸的联合肌腱和不完整拉伸的情况下前路稳定性的恢复;(2)比较临床研究,比较了Latarjet和FBB手术后患者的结果。进行了对照实验室研究的描述性综合和比较临床研究的定量荟萃分析。结果:包括6项对照实验室研究和4项比较临床研究。其中四项实验室研究支持吊带效应的存在,而两项研究得出结论,没有额外的影响;然而,他们的数据倾向于支持通过吊带效应改善前路稳定性。四项比较临床研究的荟萃分析显示,Latarjet和FBB在任何活动范围测量、结局评分或复发不稳定的几率方面均无差异(优势比:0.83,95%可信区间:0.20-3.52),这与每个单独研究的结果一致。结论:虽然Latarjet和FBB手术在恢复稳定性方面都是有效的,但我们对文献的批判性回顾表明,在生物力学尸体研究中,由于“吊带效应”导致的前平移减少在足够的前盂骨恢复后并不具有临床意义。
Is The "Sling Effect" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies.
Background: The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the "sling effect" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.
Methods: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.
Results: Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.
Conclusion: While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the "sling effect" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.