Latarjet手术中联合肌腱的“吊索效应”是真实的吗?对照实验室和比较临床研究的系统综述和描述性综合。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007
Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones
{"title":"Latarjet手术中联合肌腱的“吊索效应”是真实的吗?对照实验室和比较临床研究的系统综述和描述性综合。","authors":"Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the \"sling effect\" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the \"sling effect\" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is The \\\"Sling Effect\\\" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the \\\"sling effect\\\" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the \\\"sling effect\\\" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Latarjet手术被认为是治疗存在严重肩关节骨丢失的前肩不稳患者的金标准。Latarjet的支持者认为其疗效部分归因于关节肌腱的“吊索效应”;然而,最近的研究表明,在接受游离骨阻滞(FBB)手术的患者中,前路稳定性的恢复类似。本系统综述的目的是评估吊索效应的生物力学和临床证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science和Cochrane分别查询了(1)对照实验室研究,比较了在完整拉伸的联合肌腱和不完整拉伸的情况下前路稳定性的恢复;(2)比较临床研究,比较了Latarjet和FBB手术后患者的结果。进行了对照实验室研究的描述性综合和比较临床研究的定量荟萃分析。结果:包括6项对照实验室研究和4项比较临床研究。其中四项实验室研究支持吊带效应的存在,而两项研究得出结论,没有额外的影响;然而,他们的数据倾向于支持通过吊带效应改善前路稳定性。四项比较临床研究的荟萃分析显示,Latarjet和FBB在任何活动范围测量、结局评分或复发不稳定的几率方面均无差异(优势比:0.83,95%可信区间:0.20-3.52),这与每个单独研究的结果一致。结论:虽然Latarjet和FBB手术在恢复稳定性方面都是有效的,但我们对文献的批判性回顾表明,在生物力学尸体研究中,由于“吊带效应”导致的前平移减少在足够的前盂骨恢复后并不具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is The "Sling Effect" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies.

Background: The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the "sling effect" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.

Methods: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.

Results: Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.

Conclusion: While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the "sling effect" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative COVID-19 infection increases risk for 60-day complications following total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis. Clinical results and computed tomography analysis of intuitive shoulder arthroplasty (ISA) stemless at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Influence of age-related bone density changes on primary stability in stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-implant finite element study. The relationship between design-based lateralization, humeral bearing design, polyethylene angle, and patient-related factors on surgical complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a machine learning analysis. Patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have less pain and require fewer opioid pain medications compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the early postoperative period: a retrospective review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1