比较青少年运动与非运动相关脑震荡的同伴关系评分。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Physician and Sportsmedicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1080/00913847.2025.2450216
Hunter Iverson, Katherine Smulligan, Catherine Donahue, Joshua Kniss, Mathew Wingerson, Julie Wilson, David Howell
{"title":"比较青少年运动与非运动相关脑震荡的同伴关系评分。","authors":"Hunter Iverson, Katherine Smulligan, Catherine Donahue, Joshua Kniss, Mathew Wingerson, Julie Wilson, David Howell","doi":"10.1080/00913847.2025.2450216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if peer relationship ratings differ among adolescents who sustain a sport-related concussion compared to those who sustain a non-sport-related concussion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional investigation of 123 adolescents who sustained a concussion within 21 days before their initial post-injury evaluation (mean = 9.2 ± 3.9 days post-concussion). Participants reported whether their injury occurred during organized sport participation (sport-related concussion group) or not (non-sport-related concussion group). Participants completed the PROMIS Global Pediatric 25 assessment, as well as the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) to rate concussion symptom severity and a background/demographic intake form during the evaluation. We compared PROMIS peer relationship ratings between groups using independent t-tests and evaluated the association between peer relationship ratings and sport-related concussion using multiple linear regression after adjusting for covariates including PROMIS anxiety rating, age, sex, concussion and musculoskeletal injury history, loss of consciousness at time of concussion, physical activity participation prior to study evaluation, and concussion symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (<i>N</i> = 96, 78%) participants reported sustaining a concussion during sports. The group who sustained sport-related concussion reported significantly better post-concussion peer relationship ratings compared to the group who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (52.7 ± 7.7 vs. 47.7 ± 10.4; <i>p</i> = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.60). After covariate adjustment, those who sustained a sport-related concussion had a significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship rating than those who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (β = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.39, 8.00; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Higher peer relationship ratings were also associated with lower anxiety ratings following concussion (β= -0.21, 95% CI= -0.38, -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents who sustained a concussion during sports reported significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship ratings than those in non-sport settings. Better peer relationship ratings were associated with less anxiety in the post-injury period. These findings suggest the potential effects of contextual factors (e.g. peer support) to facilitate improved outcomes following adolescent concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51268,"journal":{"name":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing peer relationship ratings among adolescents with sport and Non-sport Related Concussions.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter Iverson, Katherine Smulligan, Catherine Donahue, Joshua Kniss, Mathew Wingerson, Julie Wilson, David Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00913847.2025.2450216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if peer relationship ratings differ among adolescents who sustain a sport-related concussion compared to those who sustain a non-sport-related concussion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional investigation of 123 adolescents who sustained a concussion within 21 days before their initial post-injury evaluation (mean = 9.2 ± 3.9 days post-concussion). Participants reported whether their injury occurred during organized sport participation (sport-related concussion group) or not (non-sport-related concussion group). Participants completed the PROMIS Global Pediatric 25 assessment, as well as the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) to rate concussion symptom severity and a background/demographic intake form during the evaluation. We compared PROMIS peer relationship ratings between groups using independent t-tests and evaluated the association between peer relationship ratings and sport-related concussion using multiple linear regression after adjusting for covariates including PROMIS anxiety rating, age, sex, concussion and musculoskeletal injury history, loss of consciousness at time of concussion, physical activity participation prior to study evaluation, and concussion symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (<i>N</i> = 96, 78%) participants reported sustaining a concussion during sports. The group who sustained sport-related concussion reported significantly better post-concussion peer relationship ratings compared to the group who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (52.7 ± 7.7 vs. 47.7 ± 10.4; <i>p</i> = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.60). After covariate adjustment, those who sustained a sport-related concussion had a significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship rating than those who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (β = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.39, 8.00; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Higher peer relationship ratings were also associated with lower anxiety ratings following concussion (β= -0.21, 95% CI= -0.38, -0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents who sustained a concussion during sports reported significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship ratings than those in non-sport settings. Better peer relationship ratings were associated with less anxiety in the post-injury period. These findings suggest the potential effects of contextual factors (e.g. peer support) to facilitate improved outcomes following adolescent concussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2025.2450216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2025.2450216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估青少年同伴关系评分是否在遭受运动相关脑震荡的青少年中与遭受非运动相关脑震荡的青少年中有所不同。研究设计:我们对123名青少年进行了横断面调查,这些青少年在首次损伤后评估前21天(平均= 9.2±3.9天)遭受脑震荡。参与者报告了他们的损伤是否发生在有组织的体育活动中(运动相关脑震荡组)或不是(非运动相关脑震荡组)。参与者完成了PROMIS全球儿科25评估,以及脑震荡后症状清单(PCSI)来评估脑震荡症状的严重程度,并在评估期间填写了背景/人口统计摄入表。我们使用独立t检验比较各组之间的PROMIS同伴关系评分,并在调整协变量(包括PROMIS焦虑评分、年龄、性别、脑震荡和肌肉骨骼损伤史、脑震荡时意识丧失、研究评估前的体育活动参与情况和脑震荡症状严重程度)后,使用多元线性回归评估同伴关系评分与运动相关脑震荡之间的关系。结果:大多数(N = 96,78%)参与者报告在运动中遭受脑震荡。运动相关脑震荡组的同伴关系评分明显高于非运动相关脑震荡组(52.7±7.7比47.7±10.4;p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.60)。协变量调整后,运动相关脑震荡患者的同伴关系评分显著高于非运动相关脑震荡患者(β = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.39, 8.00;p = 0.03)。较高的同伴关系评分也与脑震荡后较低的焦虑评分相关(β= -0.21, 95% CI= -0.38, -0.04;p = 0.03)。结论:在运动中遭受脑震荡的青少年报告的脑震荡后同伴关系评分明显高于非运动环境的青少年。同伴关系评分越高,受伤后的焦虑程度越低。这些发现表明,背景因素(如同伴支持)对青少年脑震荡后改善预后有潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing peer relationship ratings among adolescents with sport and Non-sport Related Concussions.

Objective: To evaluate if peer relationship ratings differ among adolescents who sustain a sport-related concussion compared to those who sustain a non-sport-related concussion.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional investigation of 123 adolescents who sustained a concussion within 21 days before their initial post-injury evaluation (mean = 9.2 ± 3.9 days post-concussion). Participants reported whether their injury occurred during organized sport participation (sport-related concussion group) or not (non-sport-related concussion group). Participants completed the PROMIS Global Pediatric 25 assessment, as well as the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) to rate concussion symptom severity and a background/demographic intake form during the evaluation. We compared PROMIS peer relationship ratings between groups using independent t-tests and evaluated the association between peer relationship ratings and sport-related concussion using multiple linear regression after adjusting for covariates including PROMIS anxiety rating, age, sex, concussion and musculoskeletal injury history, loss of consciousness at time of concussion, physical activity participation prior to study evaluation, and concussion symptom severity.

Results: Most (N = 96, 78%) participants reported sustaining a concussion during sports. The group who sustained sport-related concussion reported significantly better post-concussion peer relationship ratings compared to the group who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (52.7 ± 7.7 vs. 47.7 ± 10.4; p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.60). After covariate adjustment, those who sustained a sport-related concussion had a significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship rating than those who sustained a non-sport-related concussion (β = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.39, 8.00; p = 0.03). Higher peer relationship ratings were also associated with lower anxiety ratings following concussion (β= -0.21, 95% CI= -0.38, -0.04; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Adolescents who sustained a concussion during sports reported significantly greater post-concussion peer relationship ratings than those in non-sport settings. Better peer relationship ratings were associated with less anxiety in the post-injury period. These findings suggest the potential effects of contextual factors (e.g. peer support) to facilitate improved outcomes following adolescent concussion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physician and Sportsmedicine
Physician and Sportsmedicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented publication for primary care physicians. We examine the latest drug discoveries to advance treatment and recovery, and take into account the medical aspects of exercise therapy for a given condition. We cover the latest primary care-focused treatments serving the needs of our active patient population, and assess the limits these treatments govern in stabilization and recovery. The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid primary care physicians’ advancement in methods of care and treatment. We routinely cover such topics as: managing chronic disease, surgical techniques in preventing and managing injuries, the latest advancements in treatments for helping patients lose weight, and related exercise and nutrition topics that can impact the patient during recovery and modification.
期刊最新文献
Return to play and athletic performance in division I female volleyball players following anterior cruciate ligament injury. Degenerative changes of the wrist in mixed martial arts and boxing based on the three column theory. Impact of repeated sportive chokes on carotid intima media thickness and brain injury biomarkers in grappling athletes. Illness is more prevalent than injury in trail runners participating in a mountainous ultra trail race. Medical advisability of softball youth pitching recommendations on the internet.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1