斜切口重建前交叉韧带的随机对照试验:在不影响结果的情况下尽量减少感觉缺陷。

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865
Gopinath Duraiswamy, Munis Ashraf, Earnest Paul, Santosh Sahanand K, David V Rajan
{"title":"斜切口重建前交叉韧带的随机对照试验:在不影响结果的情况下尽量减少感觉缺陷。","authors":"Gopinath Duraiswamy, Munis Ashraf, Earnest Paul, Santosh Sahanand K, David V Rajan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of different incision types (oblique, vertical, and horizontal) for hamstring graft harvest on sensory disturbances and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 118 patients were randomized into three groups: oblique incision (n = 40), vertical incision (n = 40), and horizontal incision (n = 38). Sensory deficits were assessed using Von Frey Filaments at three weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation score at the 6-month mark. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and post-hoc tests to compare sensory disturbances across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months, the oblique incision group demonstrated significantly less sensory disturbance (34.7 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 38.6) than the vertical (43.8 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 39.1) and horizontal (63.4 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 42.4) incision groups (p = 0.031). No significant differences were found between the oblique and vertical incisions. The functional outcomes were comparable across all groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with vertical and horizontal incisions, oblique incisions for hamstring graft harvesting significantly reduced sensory disturbances without compromising functional outcomes. These findings suggest that careful selection of incision type can improve postoperative sensory outcomes in ACL reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"60 ","pages":"102865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized controlled trial on oblique incisions for ACL reconstruction: Minimizing sensory deficit without compromising outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Gopinath Duraiswamy, Munis Ashraf, Earnest Paul, Santosh Sahanand K, David V Rajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of different incision types (oblique, vertical, and horizontal) for hamstring graft harvest on sensory disturbances and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 118 patients were randomized into three groups: oblique incision (n = 40), vertical incision (n = 40), and horizontal incision (n = 38). Sensory deficits were assessed using Von Frey Filaments at three weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation score at the 6-month mark. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and post-hoc tests to compare sensory disturbances across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months, the oblique incision group demonstrated significantly less sensory disturbance (34.7 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 38.6) than the vertical (43.8 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 39.1) and horizontal (63.4 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 42.4) incision groups (p = 0.031). No significant differences were found between the oblique and vertical incisions. The functional outcomes were comparable across all groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with vertical and horizontal incisions, oblique incisions for hamstring graft harvesting significantly reduced sensory disturbances without compromising functional outcomes. These findings suggest that careful selection of incision type can improve postoperative sensory outcomes in ACL reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"102865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本随机对照试验旨在评估不同切口类型(斜、垂直和水平)对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后感觉障碍和功能结果的影响。方法:118例患者随机分为3组:斜切口(n = 40)、垂直切口(n = 40)、水平切口(n = 38)。术后3周、3个月和6个月用Von Frey纤维丝评估感觉缺陷。使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC) 2000主观膝关节评估评分在6个月时测量功能结果。统计分析包括方差分析和事后检验来比较各组间的感觉障碍。结果:6个月时,斜切口组感觉障碍(34.7 mm2±38.6)明显低于垂直切口组(43.8 mm2±39.1)和水平切口组(63.4 mm2±42.4)(p = 0.031)。斜切口与垂直切口间无明显差异。两组间功能结果具有可比性(P < 0.05)。结论:与垂直切口和水平切口相比,斜切口在不影响功能预后的情况下可显著减少感觉障碍。这些结果表明,仔细选择切口类型可以改善ACL重建术后的感觉结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized controlled trial on oblique incisions for ACL reconstruction: Minimizing sensory deficit without compromising outcome.

Aim: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of different incision types (oblique, vertical, and horizontal) for hamstring graft harvest on sensory disturbances and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods: A total of 118 patients were randomized into three groups: oblique incision (n = 40), vertical incision (n = 40), and horizontal incision (n = 38). Sensory deficits were assessed using Von Frey Filaments at three weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation score at the 6-month mark. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and post-hoc tests to compare sensory disturbances across groups.

Results: At 6 months, the oblique incision group demonstrated significantly less sensory disturbance (34.7 mm2 ± 38.6) than the vertical (43.8 mm2 ± 39.1) and horizontal (63.4 mm2 ± 42.4) incision groups (p = 0.031). No significant differences were found between the oblique and vertical incisions. The functional outcomes were comparable across all groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with vertical and horizontal incisions, oblique incisions for hamstring graft harvesting significantly reduced sensory disturbances without compromising functional outcomes. These findings suggest that careful selection of incision type can improve postoperative sensory outcomes in ACL reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1