{"title":"[儿科测量量表的验证过程和分析的依从性水平]。","authors":"José A Martinez, Laura Martinez","doi":"10.32641/andespediatr.v95i4.5081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of latent construct measurement scales is widespread in the medical literature. An essential condition is that the instrument be validated, in addition to being highly reliable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the level of compliance with various methodological and statistical premises of validation studies of psychometric instruments in pediatrics, which are necessary to ensure adequate interpretation of the results, in order to offer recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published in two of the most prestigious journals in Spanish (Andes Pediatrica and Anales de Pediatría) were identified between December 2000 and December 2023, where factor analysis was performed on the items of measurement scales, and in which the reliability and validity of these scales were studied. Twenty-five articles that met the selection criteria were selected and compared with the analysis procedure recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key points were identified to improve: 1) Reflective and formative indicators; 2) Determination of the best reflective indicator; 3) Validity of a scale linked to the fit of the theoretical model; 4) Reliability using Cronbach's alpha; 5) Factor analysis versus principal components. Factor rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis processes of measurement instruments in pediatrics must be improved, especially regarding the selection and specification of indicators, the use of factor analysis, and the fit of the proposed models.</p>","PeriodicalId":72196,"journal":{"name":"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria","volume":"95 4","pages":"459-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Level of compliance with validation processes and analysis of measurement scales in pediatrics].\",\"authors\":\"José A Martinez, Laura Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.32641/andespediatr.v95i4.5081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of latent construct measurement scales is widespread in the medical literature. An essential condition is that the instrument be validated, in addition to being highly reliable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the level of compliance with various methodological and statistical premises of validation studies of psychometric instruments in pediatrics, which are necessary to ensure adequate interpretation of the results, in order to offer recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published in two of the most prestigious journals in Spanish (Andes Pediatrica and Anales de Pediatría) were identified between December 2000 and December 2023, where factor analysis was performed on the items of measurement scales, and in which the reliability and validity of these scales were studied. Twenty-five articles that met the selection criteria were selected and compared with the analysis procedure recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key points were identified to improve: 1) Reflective and formative indicators; 2) Determination of the best reflective indicator; 3) Validity of a scale linked to the fit of the theoretical model; 4) Reliability using Cronbach's alpha; 5) Factor analysis versus principal components. Factor rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis processes of measurement instruments in pediatrics must be improved, especially regarding the selection and specification of indicators, the use of factor analysis, and the fit of the proposed models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria\",\"volume\":\"95 4\",\"pages\":\"459-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v95i4.5081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v95i4.5081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
潜在构念量表在医学文献中广泛使用。除高度可靠外,仪器还必须经过验证,这是必不可少的条件。目的:评价儿科心理测量工具验证性研究中各种方法学和统计学前提的依从性水平,以确保结果得到充分的解释,为今后的研究提供建议。方法:选取2000年12月至2023年12月在西班牙最权威的两种期刊(Andes pediatrics和Anales de Pediatría)上发表的文章,对测量量表的条目进行因子分析,并对量表的信度和效度进行研究。选择符合选择标准的25篇文章,并与分析程序建议进行比较。结果:确定了五个改进要点:1)反思性和形成性指标;2)最佳反射指标的确定;3)与理论模型拟合相关的量表的有效性;4)采用Cronbach's alpha计算信度;因子分析与主成分分析。因子旋转。结论:儿科测量仪器的分析流程有待改进,特别是在指标的选择与规范、因子分析的运用、模型的拟合等方面。
[Level of compliance with validation processes and analysis of measurement scales in pediatrics].
The use of latent construct measurement scales is widespread in the medical literature. An essential condition is that the instrument be validated, in addition to being highly reliable.
Objective: To evaluate the level of compliance with various methodological and statistical premises of validation studies of psychometric instruments in pediatrics, which are necessary to ensure adequate interpretation of the results, in order to offer recommendations for future research.
Methods: Articles published in two of the most prestigious journals in Spanish (Andes Pediatrica and Anales de Pediatría) were identified between December 2000 and December 2023, where factor analysis was performed on the items of measurement scales, and in which the reliability and validity of these scales were studied. Twenty-five articles that met the selection criteria were selected and compared with the analysis procedure recommendations.
Results: Five key points were identified to improve: 1) Reflective and formative indicators; 2) Determination of the best reflective indicator; 3) Validity of a scale linked to the fit of the theoretical model; 4) Reliability using Cronbach's alpha; 5) Factor analysis versus principal components. Factor rotation.
Conclusions: The analysis processes of measurement instruments in pediatrics must be improved, especially regarding the selection and specification of indicators, the use of factor analysis, and the fit of the proposed models.