天然药物数据库中药物-营养相互作用和膳食补充剂机制活性的验证与应用。

JCO oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1200/OA-24-00062
Blake O Langley, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Yuhan Huang, Amy Indorf, Michael Robles, Rachel Feaster, Lia D'Addario, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Lawrence H Kushi, Heather Greenlee
{"title":"天然药物数据库中药物-营养相互作用和膳食补充剂机制活性的验证与应用。","authors":"Blake O Langley, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Yuhan Huang, Amy Indorf, Michael Robles, Rachel Feaster, Lia D'Addario, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Lawrence H Kushi, Heather Greenlee","doi":"10.1200/OA-24-00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing use of dietary supplements by patients with cancer and other chronic diseases requires the systematized review of potential interactions between prescription drugs and nutrients from supplements by health care and clinical research teams. Dietary supplement interaction databases are positioned to fill a gap in quantifying potential risks for patients, although none have been assessed for reliability in data interpretation. The NatMed database, a source for comprehensive reports on mechanistic and safety data for dietary supplement ingredients, was evaluated for use in future investigations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from NatMed were retrieved using licensed end points for ingredient monographs with drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin across five pharmacokinetic and metabolic pathways, and for ingredient monographs with antioxidant activity. Interactions between dietary supplements and doxorubicin treatment and antioxidant monographs were independently reviewed and characterized by clinical pharmacists. Cohen's K was used to measure interrater reliability and the degree of agreement between pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifteen potential interactions with doxorubicin (n = 115 monographs) and 455 other antioxidant ingredients were identified and reviewed by clinical pharmacists. There was substantial to near-perfect agreement for drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin (Cohen's K = 0.64-0.85) and for antioxidants (Cohen's K = 0.84). A small proportion of retrieved monographs were not validated by the clinical pharmacists for interactions with doxorubicin (n = 20 occurrences, 6.4%) or for antioxidant activity (n = 28, 6.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high degree of reliability in data on dietary supplement interactions with doxorubicin and mechanisms of action suggests NatMed may be a dependable source of data for future investigators. Additional procedures including independent data validation and use of multiple dietary supplement interaction databases will strengthen the quality of findings in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520350,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology advances","volume":"1 ","pages":"e2400062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and Utility of Drug-Nutrient Interaction and Dietary Supplement Mechanistic Activity in the Natural Medicines Database.\",\"authors\":\"Blake O Langley, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Yuhan Huang, Amy Indorf, Michael Robles, Rachel Feaster, Lia D'Addario, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Lawrence H Kushi, Heather Greenlee\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OA-24-00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing use of dietary supplements by patients with cancer and other chronic diseases requires the systematized review of potential interactions between prescription drugs and nutrients from supplements by health care and clinical research teams. Dietary supplement interaction databases are positioned to fill a gap in quantifying potential risks for patients, although none have been assessed for reliability in data interpretation. The NatMed database, a source for comprehensive reports on mechanistic and safety data for dietary supplement ingredients, was evaluated for use in future investigations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from NatMed were retrieved using licensed end points for ingredient monographs with drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin across five pharmacokinetic and metabolic pathways, and for ingredient monographs with antioxidant activity. Interactions between dietary supplements and doxorubicin treatment and antioxidant monographs were independently reviewed and characterized by clinical pharmacists. Cohen's K was used to measure interrater reliability and the degree of agreement between pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifteen potential interactions with doxorubicin (n = 115 monographs) and 455 other antioxidant ingredients were identified and reviewed by clinical pharmacists. There was substantial to near-perfect agreement for drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin (Cohen's K = 0.64-0.85) and for antioxidants (Cohen's K = 0.84). A small proportion of retrieved monographs were not validated by the clinical pharmacists for interactions with doxorubicin (n = 20 occurrences, 6.4%) or for antioxidant activity (n = 28, 6.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high degree of reliability in data on dietary supplement interactions with doxorubicin and mechanisms of action suggests NatMed may be a dependable source of data for future investigators. Additional procedures including independent data validation and use of multiple dietary supplement interaction databases will strengthen the quality of findings in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"e2400062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OA-24-00062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OA-24-00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症和其他慢性疾病患者越来越多地使用膳食补充剂,这需要卫生保健和临床研究团队对处方药和补充剂中的营养素之间潜在的相互作用进行系统的审查。膳食补充剂相互作用数据库被定位为填补在量化患者潜在风险方面的空白,尽管没有一个数据库被评估数据解释的可靠性。NatMed数据库是关于膳食补充剂成分的机理和安全性数据的综合报告的来源,对其在未来调查中的使用进行了评估。方法:使用经许可的终点检索NatMed的数据,这些终点包括药物-营养物质与阿霉素通过5种药代动力学和代谢途径相互作用的成分专论,以及具有抗氧化活性的成分专论。膳食补充剂与阿霉素治疗和抗氧化专著之间的相互作用由临床药师独立审查和表征。Cohen’s K用于测量互译者信度和药剂师之间的一致程度。结果:临床药师鉴定并审查了315种与阿霉素(n = 115)和455种其他抗氧化成分的潜在相互作用。阿霉素与抗氧化剂之间的药物营养相互作用(科恩K = 0.64-0.85)和抗氧化剂之间的相互作用(科恩K = 0.84)几乎完全一致。一小部分检索到的专著未被临床药师验证与阿霉素的相互作用(n = 20次,6.4%)或抗氧化活性(n = 28次,6.2%)。结论:膳食补充剂与阿霉素相互作用和作用机制的数据高度可靠,这表明NatMed可能是未来研究人员可靠的数据来源。包括独立数据验证和使用多种膳食补充剂相互作用数据库在内的附加程序将加强未来研究结果的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation and Utility of Drug-Nutrient Interaction and Dietary Supplement Mechanistic Activity in the Natural Medicines Database.

Purpose: The increasing use of dietary supplements by patients with cancer and other chronic diseases requires the systematized review of potential interactions between prescription drugs and nutrients from supplements by health care and clinical research teams. Dietary supplement interaction databases are positioned to fill a gap in quantifying potential risks for patients, although none have been assessed for reliability in data interpretation. The NatMed database, a source for comprehensive reports on mechanistic and safety data for dietary supplement ingredients, was evaluated for use in future investigations.

Methods: Data from NatMed were retrieved using licensed end points for ingredient monographs with drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin across five pharmacokinetic and metabolic pathways, and for ingredient monographs with antioxidant activity. Interactions between dietary supplements and doxorubicin treatment and antioxidant monographs were independently reviewed and characterized by clinical pharmacists. Cohen's K was used to measure interrater reliability and the degree of agreement between pharmacists.

Results: Three hundred fifteen potential interactions with doxorubicin (n = 115 monographs) and 455 other antioxidant ingredients were identified and reviewed by clinical pharmacists. There was substantial to near-perfect agreement for drug-nutrient interactions with doxorubicin (Cohen's K = 0.64-0.85) and for antioxidants (Cohen's K = 0.84). A small proportion of retrieved monographs were not validated by the clinical pharmacists for interactions with doxorubicin (n = 20 occurrences, 6.4%) or for antioxidant activity (n = 28, 6.2%).

Conclusion: A high degree of reliability in data on dietary supplement interactions with doxorubicin and mechanisms of action suggests NatMed may be a dependable source of data for future investigators. Additional procedures including independent data validation and use of multiple dietary supplement interaction databases will strengthen the quality of findings in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Randomized Trial of Fixed-Dose Capecitabine Compared With Standard-Dose Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer: X-7/7 Trial. State of Professional Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Career Plans Among US Oncologists in 2023. Challenges and Opportunities in Targeting the Complex Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment. Accrual Suspensions in Seamless Phase II/III Trials: A Review of NRG Oncology Trials. Validation and Utility of Drug-Nutrient Interaction and Dietary Supplement Mechanistic Activity in the Natural Medicines Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1