描述处理低采样和异常值的管理区

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Precision Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s11119-024-10218-w
Cesar de Oliveira Ferreira Silva, Celia Regina Grego, Rodrigo Lilla Manzione, Stanley Robson de Medeiros Oliveira, Gustavo Costa Rodrigues, Cristina Aparecida Gonçalves Rodrigues
{"title":"描述处理低采样和异常值的管理区","authors":"Cesar de Oliveira Ferreira Silva, Celia Regina Grego, Rodrigo Lilla Manzione, Stanley Robson de Medeiros Oliveira, Gustavo Costa Rodrigues, Cristina Aparecida Gonçalves Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10218-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Management zones (MZs) are the subdivision of a field into a few contiguous homogeneous zones to guide variable-rate application. Delineating MZs can be based on geostatistical or clustering approaches, however, the joint use of these approaches is not usual. Here, we show a joint use of both techniques. The objective of this manuscript is twofold: (1) compare different procedures for creating management zones and (2) determine the relation of the MZs delineated with i) coffee yield maps and ii) the summarizing power of each method for each input variable inside the MZs delineated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The techniques compared to summary spatial data were: (1) summarizing the variables into a soil fertility index (SFI), (2) the MULTISPATI-PCA technique, and (3) the multivariate Min/Max autocorrelation factors (MAF) approach. Then, clustering methods were applied to perform field partition into binary MZs (grouping lower and higher values of input variables).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results and discussion</h3><p>The MAF approach achieved the best field partition regarding clustering metrics (McNemar’s test, Silhouette Score Coefficient, and variance reduction). In this paper we did not use yields as a cluster variable but as a measure of success. MAF also was the best one for separating low- from high-yielding areas over the MZs. The results show that the proposed approach could be effectively used for management zone delineation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This methodology facilitates evaluating innovative approaches in challenging spatial modeling scenarios, such as low-sampled fields with outliers. A wide range of summarization methods and clustering techniques are available, making this agnostic approach quite interesting for delivering MZ maps. This flexible approach can guide precision nutrient management in low-sampled areas, allowing the joint use of data science tools and agronomical knowledge to delineate variable rate application strategies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delineation of management zones dealing with low sampling and outliers\",\"authors\":\"Cesar de Oliveira Ferreira Silva, Celia Regina Grego, Rodrigo Lilla Manzione, Stanley Robson de Medeiros Oliveira, Gustavo Costa Rodrigues, Cristina Aparecida Gonçalves Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10218-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Management zones (MZs) are the subdivision of a field into a few contiguous homogeneous zones to guide variable-rate application. Delineating MZs can be based on geostatistical or clustering approaches, however, the joint use of these approaches is not usual. Here, we show a joint use of both techniques. The objective of this manuscript is twofold: (1) compare different procedures for creating management zones and (2) determine the relation of the MZs delineated with i) coffee yield maps and ii) the summarizing power of each method for each input variable inside the MZs delineated.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>The techniques compared to summary spatial data were: (1) summarizing the variables into a soil fertility index (SFI), (2) the MULTISPATI-PCA technique, and (3) the multivariate Min/Max autocorrelation factors (MAF) approach. Then, clustering methods were applied to perform field partition into binary MZs (grouping lower and higher values of input variables).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results and discussion</h3><p>The MAF approach achieved the best field partition regarding clustering metrics (McNemar’s test, Silhouette Score Coefficient, and variance reduction). In this paper we did not use yields as a cluster variable but as a measure of success. MAF also was the best one for separating low- from high-yielding areas over the MZs. The results show that the proposed approach could be effectively used for management zone delineation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>This methodology facilitates evaluating innovative approaches in challenging spatial modeling scenarios, such as low-sampled fields with outliers. A wide range of summarization methods and clustering techniques are available, making this agnostic approach quite interesting for delivering MZ maps. This flexible approach can guide precision nutrient management in low-sampled areas, allowing the joint use of data science tools and agronomical knowledge to delineate variable rate application strategies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10218-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10218-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的管理区域(MZs)是将油田划分为几个连续的均匀区域,以指导可变速率的应用。划定限制区可以基于地质统计学或聚类方法,但是,联合使用这些方法并不常见。在这里,我们展示了这两种技术的联合使用。本文的目的是双重的:(1)比较创建管理区的不同程序,(2)确定与i)咖啡产量图和ii)所描述的MZs内每个输入变量的每种方法的总结能力所描绘的MZs之间的关系。方法与汇总空间数据相比较的技术有:(1)汇总变量为土壤肥力指数(SFI),(2)多空间主成分分析(multispatial - pca)技术,(3)多元最小/最大自相关因子(MAF)方法。然后,应用聚类方法将字段划分为二进制mz(将输入变量的低值和高值分组)。结果和讨论MAF方法在聚类指标(McNemar检验、剪影得分系数和方差减少)方面实现了最佳的场划分。在本文中,我们没有使用产量作为集群变量,而是作为成功的衡量标准。MAF也是隔离区上区分低产区和高产区的最佳方法。结果表明,该方法可以有效地用于管理区划的划定。该方法有助于在具有挑战性的空间建模场景中评估创新方法,例如具有异常值的低采样领域。有大量的摘要方法和聚类技术可供使用,这使得这种不可知的方法对于交付MZ地图来说非常有趣。这种灵活的方法可以指导低采样地区的精确营养管理,允许联合使用数据科学工具和农学知识来描述可变速率的应用策略。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delineation of management zones dealing with low sampling and outliers

Purpose

Management zones (MZs) are the subdivision of a field into a few contiguous homogeneous zones to guide variable-rate application. Delineating MZs can be based on geostatistical or clustering approaches, however, the joint use of these approaches is not usual. Here, we show a joint use of both techniques. The objective of this manuscript is twofold: (1) compare different procedures for creating management zones and (2) determine the relation of the MZs delineated with i) coffee yield maps and ii) the summarizing power of each method for each input variable inside the MZs delineated.

Methods

The techniques compared to summary spatial data were: (1) summarizing the variables into a soil fertility index (SFI), (2) the MULTISPATI-PCA technique, and (3) the multivariate Min/Max autocorrelation factors (MAF) approach. Then, clustering methods were applied to perform field partition into binary MZs (grouping lower and higher values of input variables).

Results and discussion

The MAF approach achieved the best field partition regarding clustering metrics (McNemar’s test, Silhouette Score Coefficient, and variance reduction). In this paper we did not use yields as a cluster variable but as a measure of success. MAF also was the best one for separating low- from high-yielding areas over the MZs. The results show that the proposed approach could be effectively used for management zone delineation.

Conclusions

This methodology facilitates evaluating innovative approaches in challenging spatial modeling scenarios, such as low-sampled fields with outliers. A wide range of summarization methods and clustering techniques are available, making this agnostic approach quite interesting for delivering MZ maps. This flexible approach can guide precision nutrient management in low-sampled areas, allowing the joint use of data science tools and agronomical knowledge to delineate variable rate application strategies.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
期刊最新文献
Cauliflower centre detection and 3-dimensional tracking for robotic intrarow weeding Forecasting field rice grain moisture content using Sentinel-2 and weather data Highly efficient wheat lodging extraction algorithm based on two-peak search algorithm Detecting spatial variation in wild blueberry water stress using UAV-borne thermal imagery: distinct temporal and reference temperature effects Stability maps using historical NDVI images on durum wheat to understand the causes of spatial variability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1