单细胞蛋白质组学数据整合的基准

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933
Yaguo Gong, Yangbo Dai, Qibiao Wu, Li Guo, Xiaojun Yao, Qingxia Yang
{"title":"单细胞蛋白质组学数据整合的基准","authors":"Yaguo Gong, Yangbo Dai, Qibiao Wu, Li Guo, Xiaojun Yao, Qingxia Yang","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-cell proteomics (SCP) detected based on different technologies always involves batch-specific variations because of differences in sample processing and other potential biases. How to integrate SCP data effectively has become a great challenge. Integration of SCP data not only requires the conservation of true biological variances, but also realizes the removal of unwanted batch effects. In this study, benchmarking analysis of popular data integration methods was conducted to determine the most suitable method for SCP data. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of these integration methods, a novel evaluation system was proposed for integrating SCP data. This evaluation system consists of three objective measures from different perspectives: category (<i><b>a</b></i>), the efficacy of correcting batch effects; category (<i><b>b</b></i>), the power of conserving biological variances; and category (<i><b>c</b></i>), the ability to identify consistent markers. For this comprehensive evaluation, five benchmark data sets under different scenarios (containing substantial proteins, substantial cells, multiple batches, multiple cell types, and unbalanced data) were utilized for selecting the most suitable data integration method. As a result, three methods, ComBat, Scanorama, and Seurat version 3 CCA, were identified as the most recommended methods for integrating SCP data. Overall, this systematic evaluation might provide valuable guidance in choosing the appropriate method for data integration in the SCP.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmark of Data Integration in Single-Cell Proteomics\",\"authors\":\"Yaguo Gong, Yangbo Dai, Qibiao Wu, Li Guo, Xiaojun Yao, Qingxia Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single-cell proteomics (SCP) detected based on different technologies always involves batch-specific variations because of differences in sample processing and other potential biases. How to integrate SCP data effectively has become a great challenge. Integration of SCP data not only requires the conservation of true biological variances, but also realizes the removal of unwanted batch effects. In this study, benchmarking analysis of popular data integration methods was conducted to determine the most suitable method for SCP data. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of these integration methods, a novel evaluation system was proposed for integrating SCP data. This evaluation system consists of three objective measures from different perspectives: category (<i><b>a</b></i>), the efficacy of correcting batch effects; category (<i><b>b</b></i>), the power of conserving biological variances; and category (<i><b>c</b></i>), the ability to identify consistent markers. For this comprehensive evaluation, five benchmark data sets under different scenarios (containing substantial proteins, substantial cells, multiple batches, multiple cell types, and unbalanced data) were utilized for selecting the most suitable data integration method. As a result, three methods, ComBat, Scanorama, and Seurat version 3 CCA, were identified as the most recommended methods for integrating SCP data. Overall, this systematic evaluation might provide valuable guidance in choosing the appropriate method for data integration in the SCP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于不同技术检测的单细胞蛋白质组学(SCP)由于样品处理的差异和其他潜在的偏差,总是存在批次特异性差异。如何有效地整合SCP数据已成为一个巨大的挑战。SCP数据的集成不仅要求保留真实的生物方差,而且要实现去除不需要的批效应。在本研究中,对常用的数据集成方法进行了基准分析,以确定最适合SCP数据的方法。为了综合评价这些集成方法的性能,提出了一种新的SCP数据集成评价体系。该评价体系由三个不同角度的客观指标组成:类别(a),纠正批次效果的有效性;(b)类,保存生物变异的能力;类别(c),识别一致标记的能力。为了进行综合评估,我们使用了5个不同场景下的基准数据集(包含大量蛋白质、大量细胞、多批次、多细胞类型和不平衡数据)来选择最合适的数据集成方法。因此,ComBat、Scanorama和Seurat version 3 CCA三种方法被认为是整合SCP数据的最推荐方法。总的来说,这种系统的评估可能为SCP中选择合适的数据集成方法提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmark of Data Integration in Single-Cell Proteomics
Single-cell proteomics (SCP) detected based on different technologies always involves batch-specific variations because of differences in sample processing and other potential biases. How to integrate SCP data effectively has become a great challenge. Integration of SCP data not only requires the conservation of true biological variances, but also realizes the removal of unwanted batch effects. In this study, benchmarking analysis of popular data integration methods was conducted to determine the most suitable method for SCP data. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of these integration methods, a novel evaluation system was proposed for integrating SCP data. This evaluation system consists of three objective measures from different perspectives: category (a), the efficacy of correcting batch effects; category (b), the power of conserving biological variances; and category (c), the ability to identify consistent markers. For this comprehensive evaluation, five benchmark data sets under different scenarios (containing substantial proteins, substantial cells, multiple batches, multiple cell types, and unbalanced data) were utilized for selecting the most suitable data integration method. As a result, three methods, ComBat, Scanorama, and Seurat version 3 CCA, were identified as the most recommended methods for integrating SCP data. Overall, this systematic evaluation might provide valuable guidance in choosing the appropriate method for data integration in the SCP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Label-Free and High-Throughput Quantification of Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions at the Single-Cell Level with Flow Cytometry. Surficial Au-S Bond Energy Repetitively Exciting Gold Nanoparticles for Enhanced Chemiluminescence Photons per Luminophore and Automatic Single-Molecule Immunoassay. Noninvasive Analysis of Skin Emanations during Cupping Therapy by Thin-Film Solid-Phase Microextraction and Dielectric Barrier Discharge Ionization Mass Spectrometry. A Vascularized Bone-on-Paper Platform To Study Periosteum-Vascular Crosstalk and Angiogenic Remodeling. In Situ Enzyme Activity Analysis in Single Living Cells Based on the EISA Reaction and Rotation or Translation Correlation Spectroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1