初级保健中老年人数字认知筛查方法的可行性和可接受性

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.092820
Louisa I. Thompson, Molly Lawrence, Jennifer A Rosenbaum, Stephanie Czech, David C Anthony, Rabin F Chandran, Arnold R Goldberg, Andrey Vyshedskiy, Anashua R Elwy, Charles B Eaton
{"title":"初级保健中老年人数字认知筛查方法的可行性和可接受性","authors":"Louisa I. Thompson, Molly Lawrence, Jennifer A Rosenbaum, Stephanie Czech, David C Anthony, Rabin F Chandran, Arnold R Goldberg, Andrey Vyshedskiy, Anashua R Elwy, Charles B Eaton","doi":"10.1002/alz.092820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundNew immunotherapies for early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have ushered in fresh hope for AD research and clinical care, but also highlight barriers to AD screening and timely diagnosis in the US. Digital cognitive assessments could potentially streamline screening and referrals for AD treatment and/or clinical trials. We report preliminary data on the feasibility and acceptability of three digital cognitive approaches for older adults completing Annual Wellness or routine follow‐up visits with a primary care provider (PCP).MethodsData were collected for an ongoing primary care‐based study in Rhode Island. Cognitive screening approaches included: 1) remote online screening with the Boston Online Cognitive Assessment (BOCA) prior to the PCP appointment, 2) self‐administered screening with the BOCA in the waiting room immediately before or after the appointment, and 3) provider‐administered screening during the appointment using the Digital Clock and Recall (Linus Health DCR<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup>). Participants also completed a 30‐minute, in‐clinic cognitive health consultation including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (as a reference standard) to receive feedback and referral options. Five PCPs aided in protocol development through focus groups and participated in data collection. Potential participants were identified via EMR. Recruitment included mailings, MyChart messages and phone calls, and direct referrals from PCPs. Exclusion criteria: dementia or other neurological disease, score of &lt;13 on the telephone version of the MoCA.Results34 older adults were screened, 23 enrolled, and 2 withdrew. The sample is currently 52% female, 81% White, and mean age is 66. Most participants completed remote BOCA screening on a smartphone. Most reported that they preferred screening at home compared to in the clinic. 11 out of 11 participants completed at least one instance of the BOCA screening online prior to their PCP appointment. DCR tablet screening was successful in 9 out of 11 PCP appointments. PCP time constraints and technological issues were reasons for incomplete administration. In‐clinic self‐administered BOCA screening was discontinued due to space and time constraints, and the lack of a designated coordinator onsite.ConclusionsBoth remote online screening and tablet‐based, provider‐administered screening in‐clinic may be feasible and acceptable approaches to cognitive screening for older adults in primary care.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Acceptability of Digital Cognitive Screening Approaches for Older Adults in Primary Care\",\"authors\":\"Louisa I. Thompson, Molly Lawrence, Jennifer A Rosenbaum, Stephanie Czech, David C Anthony, Rabin F Chandran, Arnold R Goldberg, Andrey Vyshedskiy, Anashua R Elwy, Charles B Eaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.092820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundNew immunotherapies for early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have ushered in fresh hope for AD research and clinical care, but also highlight barriers to AD screening and timely diagnosis in the US. Digital cognitive assessments could potentially streamline screening and referrals for AD treatment and/or clinical trials. We report preliminary data on the feasibility and acceptability of three digital cognitive approaches for older adults completing Annual Wellness or routine follow‐up visits with a primary care provider (PCP).MethodsData were collected for an ongoing primary care‐based study in Rhode Island. Cognitive screening approaches included: 1) remote online screening with the Boston Online Cognitive Assessment (BOCA) prior to the PCP appointment, 2) self‐administered screening with the BOCA in the waiting room immediately before or after the appointment, and 3) provider‐administered screening during the appointment using the Digital Clock and Recall (Linus Health DCR<jats:sup>TM</jats:sup>). Participants also completed a 30‐minute, in‐clinic cognitive health consultation including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (as a reference standard) to receive feedback and referral options. Five PCPs aided in protocol development through focus groups and participated in data collection. Potential participants were identified via EMR. Recruitment included mailings, MyChart messages and phone calls, and direct referrals from PCPs. Exclusion criteria: dementia or other neurological disease, score of &lt;13 on the telephone version of the MoCA.Results34 older adults were screened, 23 enrolled, and 2 withdrew. The sample is currently 52% female, 81% White, and mean age is 66. Most participants completed remote BOCA screening on a smartphone. Most reported that they preferred screening at home compared to in the clinic. 11 out of 11 participants completed at least one instance of the BOCA screening online prior to their PCP appointment. DCR tablet screening was successful in 9 out of 11 PCP appointments. PCP time constraints and technological issues were reasons for incomplete administration. In‐clinic self‐administered BOCA screening was discontinued due to space and time constraints, and the lack of a designated coordinator onsite.ConclusionsBoth remote online screening and tablet‐based, provider‐administered screening in‐clinic may be feasible and acceptable approaches to cognitive screening for older adults in primary care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092820\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)的新免疫疗法为阿尔茨海默病的研究和临床护理带来了新的希望,但也凸显了美国阿尔茨海默病筛查和及时诊断的障碍。数字认知评估可能会简化阿尔茨海默病治疗和/或临床试验的筛选和转诊。我们报告了三种数字认知方法的可行性和可接受性的初步数据,用于老年人完成年度健康或与初级保健提供者(PCP)的常规随访。方法收集罗德岛州正在进行的一项基于初级保健的研究的数据。认知筛查方法包括:1)在PCP预约之前使用波士顿在线认知评估(BOCA)进行远程在线筛查,2)在预约之前或之后在候诊室使用BOCA进行自我筛查,以及3)在预约期间使用数字时钟和回忆(Linus Health DCRTM)进行提供者管理的筛查。参与者还完成了30分钟的临床认知健康咨询,包括蒙特利尔认知评估(作为参考标准),以获得反馈和转诊选择。五个pcp通过焦点小组协助制定方案并参与数据收集。通过电子病历确定潜在参与者。招聘方式包括邮寄、MyChart信息和电话,以及从pcp直接推荐。排除标准:痴呆或其他神经系统疾病,MoCA电话版评分≥13分。结果筛选34名老年人,23人入组,2人退出。目前样本中52%为女性,81%为白人,平均年龄为66岁。大多数参与者通过智能手机完成远程BOCA筛查。大多数人报告说,与在诊所相比,他们更喜欢在家里进行筛查。11名参与者中有11人在预约PCP之前至少完成了一次在线BOCA筛查。DCR片剂筛选在11个PCP预约中有9个成功。PCP时间限制和技术问题是不完全给药的原因。由于空间和时间的限制,临床自我管理的BOCA筛查被终止,并且缺乏指定的现场协调员。结论:远程在线筛查和基于片剂的、由提供者管理的临床筛查可能是初级保健老年人认知筛查的可行和可接受的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and Acceptability of Digital Cognitive Screening Approaches for Older Adults in Primary Care
BackgroundNew immunotherapies for early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have ushered in fresh hope for AD research and clinical care, but also highlight barriers to AD screening and timely diagnosis in the US. Digital cognitive assessments could potentially streamline screening and referrals for AD treatment and/or clinical trials. We report preliminary data on the feasibility and acceptability of three digital cognitive approaches for older adults completing Annual Wellness or routine follow‐up visits with a primary care provider (PCP).MethodsData were collected for an ongoing primary care‐based study in Rhode Island. Cognitive screening approaches included: 1) remote online screening with the Boston Online Cognitive Assessment (BOCA) prior to the PCP appointment, 2) self‐administered screening with the BOCA in the waiting room immediately before or after the appointment, and 3) provider‐administered screening during the appointment using the Digital Clock and Recall (Linus Health DCRTM). Participants also completed a 30‐minute, in‐clinic cognitive health consultation including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (as a reference standard) to receive feedback and referral options. Five PCPs aided in protocol development through focus groups and participated in data collection. Potential participants were identified via EMR. Recruitment included mailings, MyChart messages and phone calls, and direct referrals from PCPs. Exclusion criteria: dementia or other neurological disease, score of <13 on the telephone version of the MoCA.Results34 older adults were screened, 23 enrolled, and 2 withdrew. The sample is currently 52% female, 81% White, and mean age is 66. Most participants completed remote BOCA screening on a smartphone. Most reported that they preferred screening at home compared to in the clinic. 11 out of 11 participants completed at least one instance of the BOCA screening online prior to their PCP appointment. DCR tablet screening was successful in 9 out of 11 PCP appointments. PCP time constraints and technological issues were reasons for incomplete administration. In‐clinic self‐administered BOCA screening was discontinued due to space and time constraints, and the lack of a designated coordinator onsite.ConclusionsBoth remote online screening and tablet‐based, provider‐administered screening in‐clinic may be feasible and acceptable approaches to cognitive screening for older adults in primary care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
The genetic landscape of early-onset Alzheimer's disease in China Differential roles of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in stepwise biomarker-guided diagnostics The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium (GBSC) plasma phospho-tau Round Robin study Soluble Aβ pathology predicts neurodegeneration and cognitive decline independently on p-tau in the earliest Alzheimer's continuum: Evidence across two independent cohorts. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1