{"title":"一种将创伤幸存者的需求传达给卫生专业人员的新工具:一项混合方法的试点研究","authors":"Holly Lewtas, Michael Field, Kabir Ahmad","doi":"10.1111/jan.16701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim(s)</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the acceptability and feasibility of using a trauma-informed communication tool to convey client needs to health professionals; and to understand the barriers and enablers for clients using the tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Mixed methods design pilot study conducted by nurses from a regional community health service in Victoria, Australia, of purposively sampled clients who have a history of sexual assault and/or family violence and clinicians from a primary care service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The investigators developed a pocket-sized communication card to convey clients' history of trauma and the clients' emotional and physical needs to health care providers.</p>\n \n <p>Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys using validated scales (‘Acceptability of Intervention Measure’ and ‘Intervention Appropriateness Measure’) were administered via anonymous online or paper-based survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen clients completed the pre-intervention survey and 12 clients completed the post-intervention client survey. Seven Nurses and three Social Workers completed the clinician survey.</p>\n \n <p>Both clients and clinicians reported high rates of acceptability and appropriateness of the tool on the outcome measures. The most commonly reported barriers to using the tool were clients forgetting to use the card and concern about how health professionals may respond.</p>\n \n <p>Content analysis of qualitative data revealed themes categorised as positive impacts (prevention of re-traumatisation), negative impacts (negative response from health professionals) and suggestions for improvement of the tool (developing a digital version, raising clinicians' awareness of the tool).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This novel tool has demonstrated a high degree of acceptability and applicability in a sample of clients with a history of trauma secondary to sexual assault and/or family violence, and community health clinicians, and several positive and negative impacts have been identified. Further research should focus on larger participant numbers and include developing a digital version and a clinician education component.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Use of a tool to communicate impacts of trauma may prevent re-telling of traumatic stories by clients and enhance quality of care delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) has been used to report the results of this study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>During development of the tool, it was reviewed by a lived experience consumer representative, the health organisations' consumer advisory panel, and a small sample of clients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 11","pages":"7909-7923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Tool to Communicate the Needs of Survivors of Trauma to Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Holly Lewtas, Michael Field, Kabir Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim(s)</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the acceptability and feasibility of using a trauma-informed communication tool to convey client needs to health professionals; and to understand the barriers and enablers for clients using the tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mixed methods design pilot study conducted by nurses from a regional community health service in Victoria, Australia, of purposively sampled clients who have a history of sexual assault and/or family violence and clinicians from a primary care service.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The investigators developed a pocket-sized communication card to convey clients' history of trauma and the clients' emotional and physical needs to health care providers.</p>\\n \\n <p>Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys using validated scales (‘Acceptability of Intervention Measure’ and ‘Intervention Appropriateness Measure’) were administered via anonymous online or paper-based survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixteen clients completed the pre-intervention survey and 12 clients completed the post-intervention client survey. Seven Nurses and three Social Workers completed the clinician survey.</p>\\n \\n <p>Both clients and clinicians reported high rates of acceptability and appropriateness of the tool on the outcome measures. The most commonly reported barriers to using the tool were clients forgetting to use the card and concern about how health professionals may respond.</p>\\n \\n <p>Content analysis of qualitative data revealed themes categorised as positive impacts (prevention of re-traumatisation), negative impacts (negative response from health professionals) and suggestions for improvement of the tool (developing a digital version, raising clinicians' awareness of the tool).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This novel tool has demonstrated a high degree of acceptability and applicability in a sample of clients with a history of trauma secondary to sexual assault and/or family violence, and community health clinicians, and several positive and negative impacts have been identified. Further research should focus on larger participant numbers and include developing a digital version and a clinician education component.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care</h3>\\n \\n <p>Use of a tool to communicate impacts of trauma may prevent re-telling of traumatic stories by clients and enhance quality of care delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) has been used to report the results of this study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>During development of the tool, it was reviewed by a lived experience consumer representative, the health organisations' consumer advisory panel, and a small sample of clients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"81 11\",\"pages\":\"7909-7923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16701\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Novel Tool to Communicate the Needs of Survivors of Trauma to Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study
Aim(s)
To explore the acceptability and feasibility of using a trauma-informed communication tool to convey client needs to health professionals; and to understand the barriers and enablers for clients using the tool.
Design
Mixed methods design pilot study conducted by nurses from a regional community health service in Victoria, Australia, of purposively sampled clients who have a history of sexual assault and/or family violence and clinicians from a primary care service.
Methods
The investigators developed a pocket-sized communication card to convey clients' history of trauma and the clients' emotional and physical needs to health care providers.
Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys using validated scales (‘Acceptability of Intervention Measure’ and ‘Intervention Appropriateness Measure’) were administered via anonymous online or paper-based survey.
Results
Sixteen clients completed the pre-intervention survey and 12 clients completed the post-intervention client survey. Seven Nurses and three Social Workers completed the clinician survey.
Both clients and clinicians reported high rates of acceptability and appropriateness of the tool on the outcome measures. The most commonly reported barriers to using the tool were clients forgetting to use the card and concern about how health professionals may respond.
Content analysis of qualitative data revealed themes categorised as positive impacts (prevention of re-traumatisation), negative impacts (negative response from health professionals) and suggestions for improvement of the tool (developing a digital version, raising clinicians' awareness of the tool).
Conclusion
This novel tool has demonstrated a high degree of acceptability and applicability in a sample of clients with a history of trauma secondary to sexual assault and/or family violence, and community health clinicians, and several positive and negative impacts have been identified. Further research should focus on larger participant numbers and include developing a digital version and a clinician education component.
Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care
Use of a tool to communicate impacts of trauma may prevent re-telling of traumatic stories by clients and enhance quality of care delivery.
Reporting Method
The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) has been used to report the results of this study.
Patient or Public Contribution
During development of the tool, it was reviewed by a lived experience consumer representative, the health organisations' consumer advisory panel, and a small sample of clients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.