儿童早期严重龋间接牙髓盖顶的生存分析及危险因素:回顾性研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Dental Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1038/s41415-024-8188-8
Shan-Shan Dai, Jin-Yi Li, Shu-Yang He, Pan-Xi Wang, Zheng-Yang Li, Qing-Yu Guo, Fei Liu
{"title":"儿童早期严重龋间接牙髓盖顶的生存分析及危险因素:回顾性研究","authors":"Shan-Shan Dai, Jin-Yi Li, Shu-Yang He, Pan-Xi Wang, Zheng-Yang Li, Qing-Yu Guo, Fei Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41415-024-8188-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Indirect pulp capping (IDPC) is a preferred treatment for pulp preservation in primary teeth. However, the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth and impact factors is still equivocal. Aims To evaluate the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth with a deep carious lesion approximating the pulp but without irreversible pulpitis or periapical disease. Methods The medical records of children who were diagnosed with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) and received IDPC under dental general anaesthesia from January 2015 to December 2020 were screened and collected. The shared frailty model was used to explore potential factors affecting the success rate of IDPC in primary teeth. Results There were 352 children with S ECC and 1,197 teeth were included in the study. A total of 47 children had IDPC that failed in the follow-up period (67 teeth). The survival rates of the teeth treated with IDPC at 48 months was 82.3%. The risk of IDPC primary tooth treatment failure in mandibular teeth was 2.35 times that of maxillary teeth and risk of failure in lesions with mesial surface involvement was 2.76 times higher than those without mesial surface involvement. Conclusion In the present study, the overall survival rate of IDPC did not decrease remarkably with time, regardless of anterior or posterior teeth. The tooth arch position and whether the mesial surface was involved in the carious lesion were found to influence the outcome of IDPC.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"238 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival analysis and risk factors of indirect pulp capping in children with severe early childhood caries: a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Shan-Shan Dai, Jin-Yi Li, Shu-Yang He, Pan-Xi Wang, Zheng-Yang Li, Qing-Yu Guo, Fei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41415-024-8188-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Indirect pulp capping (IDPC) is a preferred treatment for pulp preservation in primary teeth. However, the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth and impact factors is still equivocal. Aims To evaluate the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth with a deep carious lesion approximating the pulp but without irreversible pulpitis or periapical disease. Methods The medical records of children who were diagnosed with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) and received IDPC under dental general anaesthesia from January 2015 to December 2020 were screened and collected. The shared frailty model was used to explore potential factors affecting the success rate of IDPC in primary teeth. Results There were 352 children with S ECC and 1,197 teeth were included in the study. A total of 47 children had IDPC that failed in the follow-up period (67 teeth). The survival rates of the teeth treated with IDPC at 48 months was 82.3%. The risk of IDPC primary tooth treatment failure in mandibular teeth was 2.35 times that of maxillary teeth and risk of failure in lesions with mesial surface involvement was 2.76 times higher than those without mesial surface involvement. Conclusion In the present study, the overall survival rate of IDPC did not decrease remarkably with time, regardless of anterior or posterior teeth. The tooth arch position and whether the mesial surface was involved in the carious lesion were found to influence the outcome of IDPC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"238 1\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8188-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8188-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:间接牙髓盖盖(IDPC)是保存乳牙牙髓的首选方法。然而,乳牙IDPC成活率及影响因素尚不明确。目的探讨无不可逆性牙髓炎或根尖周疾病的近牙深部龋病患者的IDPC成活率。方法对2015年1月至2020年12月在口腔全身麻醉下诊断为严重早期儿童龋病(S-ECC)并接受IDPC治疗的患儿病历进行筛选和收集。采用共享脆性模型探讨影响乳牙IDPC成功率的潜在因素。结果本组共纳入S型ECC患儿352例,1197颗牙。随访期间47例(67颗牙)IDPC失败。IDPC治疗牙48个月存活率为82.3%。下颌牙IDPC原牙治疗失败的风险是上颌牙的2.35倍,累及近中面病变的失败风险是未累及近中面病变的2.76倍。结论在本研究中,无论是前牙还是后牙,IDPC的总存活率都没有随着时间的推移而显著降低。牙弓位置和牙中表面是否累及龋损影响IDPC的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival analysis and risk factors of indirect pulp capping in children with severe early childhood caries: a retrospective study
Background Indirect pulp capping (IDPC) is a preferred treatment for pulp preservation in primary teeth. However, the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth and impact factors is still equivocal. Aims To evaluate the survival rate of IDPC in primary teeth with a deep carious lesion approximating the pulp but without irreversible pulpitis or periapical disease. Methods The medical records of children who were diagnosed with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) and received IDPC under dental general anaesthesia from January 2015 to December 2020 were screened and collected. The shared frailty model was used to explore potential factors affecting the success rate of IDPC in primary teeth. Results There were 352 children with S ECC and 1,197 teeth were included in the study. A total of 47 children had IDPC that failed in the follow-up period (67 teeth). The survival rates of the teeth treated with IDPC at 48 months was 82.3%. The risk of IDPC primary tooth treatment failure in mandibular teeth was 2.35 times that of maxillary teeth and risk of failure in lesions with mesial surface involvement was 2.76 times higher than those without mesial surface involvement. Conclusion In the present study, the overall survival rate of IDPC did not decrease remarkably with time, regardless of anterior or posterior teeth. The tooth arch position and whether the mesial surface was involved in the carious lesion were found to influence the outcome of IDPC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
期刊最新文献
A five-year retrospective analysis (2017-2022) of reported incidents from a primary care-based education provider. Supervised toothbrushing programmes in England: a national survey of current provision and factors influencing their implementation. The endomotor to end all endomotors Collector cup collection service Unmasking abuse: improving awareness and action against IPVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1