路易体轻度认知障碍患者的神经心理测试表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/alz.14450
Kathryn A Wyman-Chick, Ece Bayram, Stephanie Gravett, Fabrizia D'Antonio, Federico Rodriguez-Porcel, Joseph P M Kane, Tanis J Ferman, Barbara A Olson-Bullis, Bradley F Boeve, Laura Bonanni, Daniel Ferreira
{"title":"路易体轻度认知障碍患者的神经心理测试表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kathryn A Wyman-Chick, Ece Bayram, Stephanie Gravett, Fabrizia D'Antonio, Federico Rodriguez-Porcel, Joseph P M Kane, Tanis J Ferman, Barbara A Olson-Bullis, Bradley F Boeve, Laura Bonanni, Daniel Ferreira","doi":"10.1002/alz.14450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to characterize the cognitive profile among individuals with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) to help guide future clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis included MCI-LB studies with cognitive data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 1990 to March 2023). MCI-LB scores were compared to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) groups with random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 26 studies and 2823 participants. Across all domains, the MCI-LB group performed worse than controls and better than DLB. Compared to MCI-AD, the MCI-LB group performed worse in attention/processing speed (g = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.35, -0.12), attention/executive (g = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.28); better in verbal immediate recall (g = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.59) and delayed memory (g = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.58).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive profiles in MCI-LB and MCI-AD are consistent with established profiles in DLB and AD. Neuropsychological assessment may be helpful in differential diagnosis, even in early disease states.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for cognition in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB). Compared to MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), MCI-LB had worse attention, executive function, and processing speed. Compared to MCI-AD, MCI-LB had better verbal immediate and delayed recall. The MCI-LB group was worse on all cognitive domains than controls, and better than dementia with Lewy bodies. Studies used different tests and there is a need for global efforts for harmonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological test performance in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn A Wyman-Chick, Ece Bayram, Stephanie Gravett, Fabrizia D'Antonio, Federico Rodriguez-Porcel, Joseph P M Kane, Tanis J Ferman, Barbara A Olson-Bullis, Bradley F Boeve, Laura Bonanni, Daniel Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.14450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to characterize the cognitive profile among individuals with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) to help guide future clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis included MCI-LB studies with cognitive data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 1990 to March 2023). MCI-LB scores were compared to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) groups with random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 26 studies and 2823 participants. Across all domains, the MCI-LB group performed worse than controls and better than DLB. Compared to MCI-AD, the MCI-LB group performed worse in attention/processing speed (g = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.35, -0.12), attention/executive (g = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.28); better in verbal immediate recall (g = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.59) and delayed memory (g = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.58).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive profiles in MCI-LB and MCI-AD are consistent with established profiles in DLB and AD. Neuropsychological assessment may be helpful in differential diagnosis, even in early disease states.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for cognition in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB). Compared to MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), MCI-LB had worse attention, executive function, and processing speed. Compared to MCI-AD, MCI-LB had better verbal immediate and delayed recall. The MCI-LB group was worse on all cognitive domains than controls, and better than dementia with Lewy bodies. Studies used different tests and there is a need for global efforts for harmonization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14450\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14450","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们试图描述轻度认知障碍伴路易体(MCI-LB)个体的认知特征,以帮助指导未来的临床标准。方法:系统回顾和荟萃分析纳入1990年1月至2023年3月来自PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和PsycINFO的认知数据的MCI-LB研究。采用随机效应模型将MCI- lb评分与对照组、阿尔茨海默病所致MCI (MCI- ad)组和路易体痴呆(DLB)组进行比较。结果:纳入26项研究,2823名受试者。在所有领域,MCI-LB组的表现都低于对照组,而优于DLB组。与MCI-AD相比,MCI-LB组在注意力/处理速度(g = -0.24, 95%可信区间[CI]: -0.35, -0.12)、注意力/执行力(g = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.28)方面表现较差;在口头即时回忆方面表现较好(g = 0.37;95% CI: 0.15, 0.59)和延迟记忆(g = 0.40;95% ci: 0.22, 0.58)。讨论:MCI-LB和MCI-AD的认知特征与DLB和AD的既定特征一致。神经心理学评估可能有助于鉴别诊断,甚至在早期疾病状态。重点:我们对轻度认知障碍伴路易体(MCI-LB)患者的认知进行了系统回顾和meta分析。与阿尔茨海默病引起的MCI (MCI- ad)相比,MCI- lb的注意力、执行功能和处理速度更差。与MCI-AD相比,MCI-LB具有更好的言语即时和延迟回忆。MCI-LB组在所有认知领域都比对照组差,但比路易体痴呆好。研究使用了不同的测试,因此需要全球努力实现统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuropsychological test performance in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We sought to characterize the cognitive profile among individuals with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) to help guide future clinical criteria.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis included MCI-LB studies with cognitive data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 1990 to March 2023). MCI-LB scores were compared to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) groups with random-effects models.

Results: We included 26 studies and 2823 participants. Across all domains, the MCI-LB group performed worse than controls and better than DLB. Compared to MCI-AD, the MCI-LB group performed worse in attention/processing speed (g = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.35, -0.12), attention/executive (g = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.28); better in verbal immediate recall (g = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.59) and delayed memory (g = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.58).

Discussion: The cognitive profiles in MCI-LB and MCI-AD are consistent with established profiles in DLB and AD. Neuropsychological assessment may be helpful in differential diagnosis, even in early disease states.

Highlights: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for cognition in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB). Compared to MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), MCI-LB had worse attention, executive function, and processing speed. Compared to MCI-AD, MCI-LB had better verbal immediate and delayed recall. The MCI-LB group was worse on all cognitive domains than controls, and better than dementia with Lewy bodies. Studies used different tests and there is a need for global efforts for harmonization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Response to the letter titled reply to “Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US” Reply to “Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US” Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in older adult population in Shanghai, China: A population-based observational study Influence of alpha-synuclein on glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease continuum: Analyses of α-synuclein seed amplification assay and FDG-PET A brain DNA co-methylation network analysis of psychosis in Alzheimer's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1