解离体验量表ⅱ的项目反应理论分析:日本成人心理测量特征和纵向稳定性的检验。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06465-w
Tatsuya Ikeda, Yuhei Urano
{"title":"解离体验量表ⅱ的项目反应理论分析:日本成人心理测量特征和纵向稳定性的检验。","authors":"Tatsuya Ikeda, Yuhei Urano","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06465-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) is widely used globally. However, psychometric properties of the scale have not been adequately examined. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and longitudinal stability of the DES-II.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We collected data at two time points, approximately three and a half years apart. At Time 1 (T1), 1029 participants (515 females, 514 males) with a mean age of 44.64 (± 14.02) responded to the survey. Out of the T1 participants, 210 individuals (105 females, 105 males) also responded to the T2 survey. We conducted item parameters of the DES-II with item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that the DES-II is suitable for measuring strong dissociative traits, with all items displaying high discriminative power. The cut-off points for the DES-II were within a good range of measurement accuracy, and longitudinal stability over approximately three and a half years was adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, we applied item response theory (IRT) to the DES-II, which has traditionally been interpreted using classical test theory (CTT). Results suggested the need for item-focused assessment rather than relying solely on mean scores or cut-off points. Specifically, results suggested that the severity levels differed across item ratings, and to set cut-off points for each item based on the severity of the ratings. Furthermore, the possibility of cultural differences in response patterns of the DES-II was indicated. However, few studies have discussed cultural differences based on IRT; hence, further research should examine response patterns of the DES-II across various cultures. In conclusion, the DES-II is a valuable tool for assessing dissociative symptoms, with adequate psychometric properties from an item response theory perspective. Clinicians should consider item-specific responses in their assessments, and further research is needed to explore the scale's applicability across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An item response theory analysis of the Dissociative Experiences Scale II: examining psychometric properties and longitudinal stability among Japanese adults.\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Ikeda, Yuhei Urano\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-024-06465-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) is widely used globally. However, psychometric properties of the scale have not been adequately examined. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and longitudinal stability of the DES-II.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We collected data at two time points, approximately three and a half years apart. At Time 1 (T1), 1029 participants (515 females, 514 males) with a mean age of 44.64 (± 14.02) responded to the survey. Out of the T1 participants, 210 individuals (105 females, 105 males) also responded to the T2 survey. We conducted item parameters of the DES-II with item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that the DES-II is suitable for measuring strong dissociative traits, with all items displaying high discriminative power. The cut-off points for the DES-II were within a good range of measurement accuracy, and longitudinal stability over approximately three and a half years was adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, we applied item response theory (IRT) to the DES-II, which has traditionally been interpreted using classical test theory (CTT). Results suggested the need for item-focused assessment rather than relying solely on mean scores or cut-off points. Specifically, results suggested that the severity levels differed across item ratings, and to set cut-off points for each item based on the severity of the ratings. Furthermore, the possibility of cultural differences in response patterns of the DES-II was indicated. However, few studies have discussed cultural differences based on IRT; hence, further research should examine response patterns of the DES-II across various cultures. In conclusion, the DES-II is a valuable tool for assessing dissociative symptoms, with adequate psychometric properties from an item response theory perspective. Clinicians should consider item-specific responses in their assessments, and further research is needed to explore the scale's applicability across diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06465-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06465-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:解离体验量表(DES-II)在全球范围内被广泛使用。然而,该量表的心理测量特性尚未得到充分的检验。本研究旨在检验DES-II的心理测量特性和纵向稳定性。方法:我们在两个时间点收集数据,大约间隔三年半。在时间1 (T1), 1029名参与者(515名女性,514名男性)回应了调查,平均年龄为44.64(±14.02)岁。在T1参与者中,210人(105名女性,105名男性)也回应了T2调查。采用项目反应理论(IRT)对DES-II进行项目参数测试。结果:本研究结果表明,DES-II适用于强解离特质的测量,所有条目都具有较高的判别力。DES-II的截止点在良好的测量精度范围内,大约三年半的纵向稳定性是足够的。结论:本研究将项目反应理论(IRT)应用于DES-II,而传统的解释方法是使用经典测试理论(CTT)。结果表明,需要以项目为重点的评估,而不是仅仅依靠平均分数或分界点。具体来说,结果表明,严重程度在不同的项目评级中有所不同,并根据评级的严重程度为每个项目设置分界点。此外,还指出了DES-II反应模式的文化差异的可能性。然而,很少有研究讨论基于IRT的文化差异;因此,进一步的研究应该检查DES-II在不同文化中的反应模式。总之,从项目反应理论的角度来看,DES-II是评估解离症状的有价值的工具,具有足够的心理测量特性。临床医生应该在评估中考虑具体项目的反应,并需要进一步的研究来探索量表在不同人群中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An item response theory analysis of the Dissociative Experiences Scale II: examining psychometric properties and longitudinal stability among Japanese adults.

Background: The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) is widely used globally. However, psychometric properties of the scale have not been adequately examined. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and longitudinal stability of the DES-II.

Method: We collected data at two time points, approximately three and a half years apart. At Time 1 (T1), 1029 participants (515 females, 514 males) with a mean age of 44.64 (± 14.02) responded to the survey. Out of the T1 participants, 210 individuals (105 females, 105 males) also responded to the T2 survey. We conducted item parameters of the DES-II with item response theory (IRT).

Results: Our results showed that the DES-II is suitable for measuring strong dissociative traits, with all items displaying high discriminative power. The cut-off points for the DES-II were within a good range of measurement accuracy, and longitudinal stability over approximately three and a half years was adequate.

Conclusion: In the present study, we applied item response theory (IRT) to the DES-II, which has traditionally been interpreted using classical test theory (CTT). Results suggested the need for item-focused assessment rather than relying solely on mean scores or cut-off points. Specifically, results suggested that the severity levels differed across item ratings, and to set cut-off points for each item based on the severity of the ratings. Furthermore, the possibility of cultural differences in response patterns of the DES-II was indicated. However, few studies have discussed cultural differences based on IRT; hence, further research should examine response patterns of the DES-II across various cultures. In conclusion, the DES-II is a valuable tool for assessing dissociative symptoms, with adequate psychometric properties from an item response theory perspective. Clinicians should consider item-specific responses in their assessments, and further research is needed to explore the scale's applicability across diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
DIALOG+ for service users with chronic depression: a cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation. Association between visceral adiposity index and incident dementia: a community-based cohort study. Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adolescents with depression. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based self-help skill strengthening (ISSS) intervention for secondary school teachers: a transdiagnostic intervention for common mental health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1