逆行腓肠皮瓣在儿科患者中的应用:系统综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004115
Amy Wang, Jean Pierre F Durand, Aaron I Dadzie, Annalisa Lopez, Petros Konofaos
{"title":"逆行腓肠皮瓣在儿科患者中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Amy Wang, Jean Pierre F Durand, Aaron I Dadzie, Annalisa Lopez, Petros Konofaos","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The reverse sural flap (RSF) is a random-type, pedicled flap based on sural artery perforators indicated for traumatic lower-extremity wounds. The RSF has demonstrated comparable results to free flap placement in the adult population for reconstruction of distal third defects, but few reports describe its application and outcomes in the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated RSF application in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) through systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were utilized. Inclusion criteria included case series and chart studies reporting on pediatric RSF patients. Primary outcomes included overall flap survival rate, venous congestion, and necrosis. Screening of 244 initial articles yielded 16 studies for further review and statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 207 patients treated with a mean age of 9.51 ± 2.27 years and follow-up of 20.07 months. The majority of studies focus on the distal third as the primary site for RSF reconstruction, with fasciocutaneous being the most commonly used flap type. Trauma was the predominant etiology of soft-tissue defect (91.0%). Analysis of outcomes shows a 91.0% survival rate for reverse sural flaps. Approximately 13.0% of patients experienced venous congestion. Flap necrosis rate was 15.0%, although most cases were subtotal (93.1%) and successfully managed through additional skin grafting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With comparable efficacy to free flaps for distal third defects in the pediatric population as well as similar success rates to adult RSF patients, the RSF should be considered a first-line therapy for lower-extremity soft-tissue reconstruction in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"236-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Reverse Sural Flaps in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Wang, Jean Pierre F Durand, Aaron I Dadzie, Annalisa Lopez, Petros Konofaos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The reverse sural flap (RSF) is a random-type, pedicled flap based on sural artery perforators indicated for traumatic lower-extremity wounds. The RSF has demonstrated comparable results to free flap placement in the adult population for reconstruction of distal third defects, but few reports describe its application and outcomes in the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated RSF application in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) through systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were utilized. Inclusion criteria included case series and chart studies reporting on pediatric RSF patients. Primary outcomes included overall flap survival rate, venous congestion, and necrosis. Screening of 244 initial articles yielded 16 studies for further review and statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 207 patients treated with a mean age of 9.51 ± 2.27 years and follow-up of 20.07 months. The majority of studies focus on the distal third as the primary site for RSF reconstruction, with fasciocutaneous being the most commonly used flap type. Trauma was the predominant etiology of soft-tissue defect (91.0%). Analysis of outcomes shows a 91.0% survival rate for reverse sural flaps. Approximately 13.0% of patients experienced venous congestion. Flap necrosis rate was 15.0%, although most cases were subtotal (93.1%) and successfully managed through additional skin grafting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With comparable efficacy to free flaps for distal third defects in the pediatric population as well as similar success rates to adult RSF patients, the RSF should be considered a first-line therapy for lower-extremity soft-tissue reconstruction in pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"236-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:逆行腓肠皮瓣(RSF)是一种基于腓肠动脉穿支的随机带蒂皮瓣,适用于创伤性下肢创伤。RSF已经证明了与游离皮瓣置放在成人中重建远端三分之一缺损的效果相当,但很少有报道描述其在儿科人群中的应用和结果。方法:调查RSF在儿科患者中的应用情况(结果:207例患者接受治疗,平均年龄(9.51±2.27)岁,随访20.07个月。大多数研究集中在远端三分之一作为RSF重建的主要部位,筋膜皮瓣是最常用的皮瓣类型。外伤是软组织缺损的主要原因(91.0%)。结果分析显示,逆行皮瓣成活率为91.0%。大约13.0%的患者出现静脉充血。皮瓣坏死率为15.0%,尽管大多数病例(93.1%)通过附加皮肤移植成功处理。结论:由于RSF治疗儿童远端三分之一缺损的疗效与游离皮瓣相当,且与成人RSF患者的成功率相似,RSF应被视为儿童下肢软组织重建的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Reverse Sural Flaps in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: The reverse sural flap (RSF) is a random-type, pedicled flap based on sural artery perforators indicated for traumatic lower-extremity wounds. The RSF has demonstrated comparable results to free flap placement in the adult population for reconstruction of distal third defects, but few reports describe its application and outcomes in the pediatric population.

Methods: We investigated RSF application in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) through systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were utilized. Inclusion criteria included case series and chart studies reporting on pediatric RSF patients. Primary outcomes included overall flap survival rate, venous congestion, and necrosis. Screening of 244 initial articles yielded 16 studies for further review and statistical analysis.

Results: There were 207 patients treated with a mean age of 9.51 ± 2.27 years and follow-up of 20.07 months. The majority of studies focus on the distal third as the primary site for RSF reconstruction, with fasciocutaneous being the most commonly used flap type. Trauma was the predominant etiology of soft-tissue defect (91.0%). Analysis of outcomes shows a 91.0% survival rate for reverse sural flaps. Approximately 13.0% of patients experienced venous congestion. Flap necrosis rate was 15.0%, although most cases were subtotal (93.1%) and successfully managed through additional skin grafting.

Conclusions: With comparable efficacy to free flaps for distal third defects in the pediatric population as well as similar success rates to adult RSF patients, the RSF should be considered a first-line therapy for lower-extremity soft-tissue reconstruction in pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method. The Impact of International Fellowship on Research Productivity: International Fellowship on Research Productivity. Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1